Impact of Weight-Based High-Flow Nasal Cannula Flow Limits on Intensive Care Unit Utilization in Bronchiolitis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Respiratory care Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-08 DOI:10.1089/respcare.12525
Gerald B Moody, Sachin Shah, Ali Hasan, A Paige Davis Volk
{"title":"Impact of Weight-Based High-Flow Nasal Cannula Flow Limits on Intensive Care Unit Utilization in Bronchiolitis.","authors":"Gerald B Moody, Sachin Shah, Ali Hasan, A Paige Davis Volk","doi":"10.1089/respcare.12525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a common respiratory support device utilized in the management of children hospitalized with bronchiolitis. Early adoption in many pediatric wards was developed using age-based flow limits. However, age-based limits do not align with current evidence and potentially contribute to ICU admissions. To align with current evidence and improve ICU bed allocation, we implemented weight-based flow limits within our wards. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of these changes on ICU utilization. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study was conducted at Children's Medical Center in Plano, Texas, a free-standing, community-based hospital affiliated with an academic quaternary center. Subjects were patients < 2 years of age admitted for bronchiolitis and supported via HFNC in the 12 months before and after implementation of weight-based flow limits. Primary outcomes were ED disposition and ICU transfer rates. Secondary outcomes were evaluation of adverse respiratory events and stay. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1,207 subjects met inclusion criteria; 558 pre- and 649 post-implementation. There were no differences between groups in age, weight, or gender. Compared with the pre-implementation group, we observed an 8.6% absolute decrease in ICU admissions [92 (16.5%) vs 51 (7.9%)<i>, P</i> < .001], a 3% absolute decrease in ward to ICU transfers [28 (6%) vs 19 (3%)<i>, P</i> = .034], and no difference in escalation of respiratory support [6 (1.1%) vs 4 (0.6%)<i>, P</i> = .38] or escalation within one hour of transfer [0 (0%) vs 2 (50%)<i>, P</i> > .99]. Overall median stay decreased by 15.9 h in the post-implementation group, [59.4 (IQR 39.1- 85.9) vs 43.5 (IQR 26.9-67.2)<i>, P</i> < .001]. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings suggest that for hospital systems utilizing similar age-based HFNC flow limits, transitioning to weight-based flows, with safeguards in place, may improve ICU bed utilization while maintaining comparable patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"1240-1247"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a common respiratory support device utilized in the management of children hospitalized with bronchiolitis. Early adoption in many pediatric wards was developed using age-based flow limits. However, age-based limits do not align with current evidence and potentially contribute to ICU admissions. To align with current evidence and improve ICU bed allocation, we implemented weight-based flow limits within our wards. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of these changes on ICU utilization. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Children's Medical Center in Plano, Texas, a free-standing, community-based hospital affiliated with an academic quaternary center. Subjects were patients < 2 years of age admitted for bronchiolitis and supported via HFNC in the 12 months before and after implementation of weight-based flow limits. Primary outcomes were ED disposition and ICU transfer rates. Secondary outcomes were evaluation of adverse respiratory events and stay. Results: A total of 1,207 subjects met inclusion criteria; 558 pre- and 649 post-implementation. There were no differences between groups in age, weight, or gender. Compared with the pre-implementation group, we observed an 8.6% absolute decrease in ICU admissions [92 (16.5%) vs 51 (7.9%), P < .001], a 3% absolute decrease in ward to ICU transfers [28 (6%) vs 19 (3%), P = .034], and no difference in escalation of respiratory support [6 (1.1%) vs 4 (0.6%), P = .38] or escalation within one hour of transfer [0 (0%) vs 2 (50%), P > .99]. Overall median stay decreased by 15.9 h in the post-implementation group, [59.4 (IQR 39.1- 85.9) vs 43.5 (IQR 26.9-67.2), P < .001]. Conclusions: These findings suggest that for hospital systems utilizing similar age-based HFNC flow limits, transitioning to weight-based flows, with safeguards in place, may improve ICU bed utilization while maintaining comparable patient outcomes.

基于体重的高流量鼻插管流量限制对毛细支气管炎重症监护病房使用率的影响。
背景:高流量鼻插管(HFNC)是治疗毛细支气管炎住院儿童常用的呼吸支持装置。许多儿科病房的早期采用基于年龄的流量限制。然而,基于年龄的限制与目前的证据不一致,并可能导致ICU入院。为了与目前的证据一致并改善ICU床位分配,我们在病房内实施了基于体重的流量限制。本研究的主要目的是评估这些变化对ICU使用率的影响。方法:本回顾性研究在德克萨斯州普莱诺儿童医学中心进行,该中心是一家独立的社区医院,隶属于一家学术中心。研究对象是年龄< 2岁的毛细支气管炎患者,在实施基于体重的流量限制前后的12个月内通过HFNC支持。主要结局是急诊科处置和ICU转移率。次要结局是不良呼吸事件和住院时间的评估。结果:共有1207名受试者符合纳入标准;558个执行前和649个执行后。各组之间在年龄、体重或性别方面没有差异。与实施前组相比,我们观察到ICU入院人数绝对减少8.6%[92(16.5%)对51 (7.9%),P < 0.001],病房转至ICU的绝对减少3%[28(6%)对19 (3%),P = 0.034],呼吸支持升级[6(1.1%)对4 (0.6%),P = 0.38]或转移后1小时内升级[0(0%)对2 (50%),P < 0.99]无差异。实施后组总中位住院时间减少15.9 h, [59.4 (IQR 39.1- 85.9) vs 43.5 (IQR 26.9-67.2), P < 0.001]。结论:这些发现表明,对于使用类似基于年龄的HFNC流量限制的医院系统,过渡到基于体重的流量,并有适当的保障措施,可以提高ICU床位利用率,同时保持可比的患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信