Telehealth in the US for patients with end-stage kidney disease: its utilization and impact on social, economic and health outcomes.

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
mHealth Pub Date : 2025-03-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.21037/mhealth-24-61
Susie Q Lew, Neal Sikka, Kevin F Erickson
{"title":"Telehealth in the US for patients with end-stage kidney disease: its utilization and impact on social, economic and health outcomes.","authors":"Susie Q Lew, Neal Sikka, Kevin F Erickson","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-24-61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of telehealth in the United States accelerated in 2020 when a coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) related public health emergency (PHE) was declared. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services issued emergency waivers that relaxed restrictions imposed by regulations on geographic locations, originating and distant sites, audio-video-conferencing technology and re-imbursement. This review focuses on the history of telehealth usage for patients with end-stage kidney disease. Patients who receive home dialysis gained widespread access to telehealth in 2019, following passage of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, Sec 50302 by the US Congress. For the first time in telehealth application, the patient's home could be an originating site without geographic restrictions for telemedicine. These earlier regulations will continue even after the PHE expires. While they made telemedicine possible for many patients receiving home dialysis, in practice, the uptake of telemedicine in the home setting may have been sluggish following the 2018 law. Rules governing the frequency of telemedicine visits and other stipulations for home dialysis that were specified in the 2018 law were relaxed in the setting of the COVID-19 waivers, further facilitating the use of telemedicine for home dialysis care. Meanwhile, the in-center dialysis unit became an originating site for the first time during the COVID-19 PHE, with a corresponding sharp increase in the use of telemedicine for in-center hemodialysis care. The waivers enabling the use of telemedicine for patients who receive in-center hemodialysis and further facilitating the use of telemedicine in home dialysis, expire with the end of the COVID-19 PHE unless Congress passes new legislation. Comparisons among the periods before, during and after the PHE can illustrate telehealth's impact and some of its challenges. Most of the literature on telehealth represents observational data. Future studies on telehealth, including clinical trials, could provide information on outcomes and cost savings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"11 ","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-24-61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of telehealth in the United States accelerated in 2020 when a coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) related public health emergency (PHE) was declared. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services issued emergency waivers that relaxed restrictions imposed by regulations on geographic locations, originating and distant sites, audio-video-conferencing technology and re-imbursement. This review focuses on the history of telehealth usage for patients with end-stage kidney disease. Patients who receive home dialysis gained widespread access to telehealth in 2019, following passage of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, Sec 50302 by the US Congress. For the first time in telehealth application, the patient's home could be an originating site without geographic restrictions for telemedicine. These earlier regulations will continue even after the PHE expires. While they made telemedicine possible for many patients receiving home dialysis, in practice, the uptake of telemedicine in the home setting may have been sluggish following the 2018 law. Rules governing the frequency of telemedicine visits and other stipulations for home dialysis that were specified in the 2018 law were relaxed in the setting of the COVID-19 waivers, further facilitating the use of telemedicine for home dialysis care. Meanwhile, the in-center dialysis unit became an originating site for the first time during the COVID-19 PHE, with a corresponding sharp increase in the use of telemedicine for in-center hemodialysis care. The waivers enabling the use of telemedicine for patients who receive in-center hemodialysis and further facilitating the use of telemedicine in home dialysis, expire with the end of the COVID-19 PHE unless Congress passes new legislation. Comparisons among the periods before, during and after the PHE can illustrate telehealth's impact and some of its challenges. Most of the literature on telehealth represents observational data. Future studies on telehealth, including clinical trials, could provide information on outcomes and cost savings.

美国终末期肾病患者的远程医疗:其利用及其对社会、经济和健康结果的影响
2020年,当宣布2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关的突发公共卫生事件(PHE)时,美国的远程医疗使用加速了。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)发布了紧急豁免,放宽了法规对地理位置、始发地点和偏远地点、视听会议技术和报销的限制。本文综述了终末期肾病患者远程医疗使用的历史。在美国国会通过2018年两党预算法案第50302节之后,接受家庭透析的患者在2019年获得了广泛的远程医疗服务。在远程医疗应用中,患者的家首次可以成为远程医疗的起始地点,而不受地理限制。这些早期的规定将在PHE到期后继续存在。虽然他们为许多接受家庭透析的患者提供了远程医疗,但在实践中,根据2018年的法律,家庭环境中远程医疗的采用可能会迟缓。在2019冠状病毒病豁免的背景下,2018年法律中关于远程医疗就诊频率的规定和家庭透析的其他规定被放宽,进一步促进了远程医疗在家庭透析护理中的应用。同时,在COVID-19 PHE期间,中心透析单元首次成为发病地点,相应的,远程医疗在中心血液透析护理中的使用急剧增加。除非国会通过新的立法,否则允许对接受中心血液透析的患者使用远程医疗并进一步促进远程医疗在家庭透析中的使用的豁免将随着COVID-19 PHE结束而到期。比较公共卫生之前、期间和之后的时期可以说明远程医疗的影响和它的一些挑战。大多数关于远程医疗的文献都是观测数据。未来关于远程保健的研究,包括临床试验,可提供有关结果和成本节约的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信