Pawsitive Care: Canine-Assisted Intervention for Anxiety in ICU Patients and Family Members: A Single-Center, Single-Arm Study.

IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-04-28 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001258
Kathleen Cook, Clare Robertson, Kiran Gudivada, Imogen Mitchell, Mary Nourse, Megan M Hosey, Catherine Paterson, Sumeet Rai
{"title":"Pawsitive Care: Canine-Assisted Intervention for Anxiety in ICU Patients and Family Members: A Single-Center, Single-Arm Study.","authors":"Kathleen Cook, Clare Robertson, Kiran Gudivada, Imogen Mitchell, Mary Nourse, Megan M Hosey, Catherine Paterson, Sumeet Rai","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the effect of canine-assisted intervention (CAI) on anxiety symptoms among intensive care patients and their family members.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, single-center, single-arm, nonrandomized, within-subject study design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary hospital ICU.</p><p><strong>Patients/subjects: </strong>Adult (≥ 16 yr) ICU patients and their family members.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Individual CAI (therapy dog) sessions, lasting at least 15 minutes.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Primary outcome: change in Visual Analog Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A) among patients and family members; secondary outcomes (patient cohort): change in: 1) Numeric Pain Rating Scale, 2) physiologic vital signs, and 3) intervention-related adverse events. A total of 141 participants (70 patients and 71 family members) were recruited. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age (yr) was 63 (49-71) for patients, and 51 (36-61) for family members. There was a significant reduction in anxiety scores after the intervention, with median (IQR) VAS-A scores changing from 5 (1-7) to 0 (0-4 [p < 0.001]) for the patient cohort and from 6 (5-8) to 3 (1-5 [p < 0.001]) for the family cohort. Majority of patients (56/70 [62%]) and family members (63/68 [93%]) demonstrated a greater than or equal to 2-point reduction in VAS-A scores. In terms of pain, median (IQR) scores among the patient cohort were also lower post-intervention (0 [0-5] vs. 0 [0-2]; p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant changes in physiologic vital signs (heart rate, respiratory rate, and systolic blood pressure) among patients following the intervention. Additionally, there were no reported dog bites, scratches, or other adverse events during CAI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CAI offers immediate therapeutic benefits in reducing anxiety symptoms in ICU patients and their family members with no observed adverse effects. It may also have a potential role as an adjunctive therapy for pain management in ICU patients. Further research should explore the influence on longer-term psychologic outcomes for ICU patients and family members.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 5","pages":"e1258"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12040009/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the effect of canine-assisted intervention (CAI) on anxiety symptoms among intensive care patients and their family members.

Design: Prospective, single-center, single-arm, nonrandomized, within-subject study design.

Setting: Tertiary hospital ICU.

Patients/subjects: Adult (≥ 16 yr) ICU patients and their family members.

Interventions: Individual CAI (therapy dog) sessions, lasting at least 15 minutes.

Measurements and main results: Primary outcome: change in Visual Analog Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A) among patients and family members; secondary outcomes (patient cohort): change in: 1) Numeric Pain Rating Scale, 2) physiologic vital signs, and 3) intervention-related adverse events. A total of 141 participants (70 patients and 71 family members) were recruited. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age (yr) was 63 (49-71) for patients, and 51 (36-61) for family members. There was a significant reduction in anxiety scores after the intervention, with median (IQR) VAS-A scores changing from 5 (1-7) to 0 (0-4 [p < 0.001]) for the patient cohort and from 6 (5-8) to 3 (1-5 [p < 0.001]) for the family cohort. Majority of patients (56/70 [62%]) and family members (63/68 [93%]) demonstrated a greater than or equal to 2-point reduction in VAS-A scores. In terms of pain, median (IQR) scores among the patient cohort were also lower post-intervention (0 [0-5] vs. 0 [0-2]; p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant changes in physiologic vital signs (heart rate, respiratory rate, and systolic blood pressure) among patients following the intervention. Additionally, there were no reported dog bites, scratches, or other adverse events during CAI.

Conclusions: CAI offers immediate therapeutic benefits in reducing anxiety symptoms in ICU patients and their family members with no observed adverse effects. It may also have a potential role as an adjunctive therapy for pain management in ICU patients. Further research should explore the influence on longer-term psychologic outcomes for ICU patients and family members.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

被动护理:犬类辅助干预对ICU患者及其家属的焦虑:一项单中心单组研究。
目的:探讨犬辅助干预(CAI)对重症监护病人及其家属焦虑症状的影响。设计:前瞻性、单中心、单臂、非随机、受试者内研究设计。工作地点:三级医院ICU。患者/受试者:成人(≥16岁)ICU患者及其家属。干预措施:个别CAI(治疗犬)会议,持续至少15分钟。主要观察结果:患者及家属焦虑视觉模拟量表(VAS-A)变化;次要结局(患者队列):改变:1)数值疼痛评定量表,2)生理性生命体征,3)干预相关不良事件。共招募了141名参与者(70名患者和71名家庭成员)。患者年龄中位数(四分位间距[IQR])为63岁(49-71岁),家属年龄为51岁(36-61岁)。干预后焦虑评分显著降低,患者队列的VAS-A中位数(IQR)从5(1-7)变为0 (0-4 [p < 0.001]),家庭队列从6(5-8)变为3 (1-5 [p < 0.001])。大多数患者(56/70[62%])和家属(63/68 [93%])VAS-A评分下降大于或等于2分。在疼痛方面,患者队列的中位(IQR)评分在干预后也较低(0 [0-5]vs. 0 [0-2];P < 0.001)。干预后患者的生理性生命体征(心率、呼吸频率和收缩压)无统计学意义的变化。此外,CAI期间没有狗咬伤、抓伤或其他不良事件的报道。结论:CAI在减轻ICU患者及其家属的焦虑症状方面具有直接的治疗效果,未观察到不良反应。它也可能有潜在的作用,作为辅助治疗的疼痛管理的ICU患者。进一步的研究应探讨对ICU患者及其家属长期心理结局的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信