Support needed by nursing students to develop professional dignity.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Isabel Hlupheka Shilenge, Neltjie Christina van Wyk, Anna Elizabeth van der Wath
{"title":"Support needed by nursing students to develop professional dignity.","authors":"Isabel Hlupheka Shilenge, Neltjie Christina van Wyk, Anna Elizabeth van der Wath","doi":"10.1177/09697330251328688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundNursing students' professional dignity development during work-integrated learning is dependent on support from professional nurses. If they are left unsupported, such development is jeopardised.AimThe aim of the study was to explore and describe the support that nursing students need from professional nurses, including their lecturers, during work-integrated learning to develop professional dignity.Research designA qualitative, exploratory-descriptive research design applied. Through volunteer sampling, participants were invited for face-to-face in-depth individual interviews to discuss the question: 'What support did you need from others during work-integrated learning to feel dignified as nursing students?' Saturation of data determined the number of participants. Recording of the interviews and the writing of field notes were carried out with the permission of the participants. Manual coding in a thematic analysis was done to analyse the intricate data content with intuition and insight.Participants and research contextThe study was undertaken in South Africa at a designated nursing education institution and the hospital where the students performed the bulk of work-integrated learning. Fourteen third-year students were interviewed. They had sufficient experience with work-integrated learning and could provide rich data concerning support needed to develop professional dignity.Ethical considerationsThe Faculty of Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee at the University of Pretoria approved the proposal (Reference number 73/2023) and the applicable authorities gave written permission for the research to be conducted. Since the participants were students, the researchers made sure that they did not feel obliged to participate.FindingsFour categories were identified, namely, (a) improving work-integrated learning experience, (b) value students' professional development, (c) cooperate to benefit students' professional growth and (d) manage resources optimally.ConclusionStudents needed to be respected and their input to quality nursing care acknowledged. Positive role models and learning conducive clinical environments contributed to their development.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330251328688"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251328688","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundNursing students' professional dignity development during work-integrated learning is dependent on support from professional nurses. If they are left unsupported, such development is jeopardised.AimThe aim of the study was to explore and describe the support that nursing students need from professional nurses, including their lecturers, during work-integrated learning to develop professional dignity.Research designA qualitative, exploratory-descriptive research design applied. Through volunteer sampling, participants were invited for face-to-face in-depth individual interviews to discuss the question: 'What support did you need from others during work-integrated learning to feel dignified as nursing students?' Saturation of data determined the number of participants. Recording of the interviews and the writing of field notes were carried out with the permission of the participants. Manual coding in a thematic analysis was done to analyse the intricate data content with intuition and insight.Participants and research contextThe study was undertaken in South Africa at a designated nursing education institution and the hospital where the students performed the bulk of work-integrated learning. Fourteen third-year students were interviewed. They had sufficient experience with work-integrated learning and could provide rich data concerning support needed to develop professional dignity.Ethical considerationsThe Faculty of Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee at the University of Pretoria approved the proposal (Reference number 73/2023) and the applicable authorities gave written permission for the research to be conducted. Since the participants were students, the researchers made sure that they did not feel obliged to participate.FindingsFour categories were identified, namely, (a) improving work-integrated learning experience, (b) value students' professional development, (c) cooperate to benefit students' professional growth and (d) manage resources optimally.ConclusionStudents needed to be respected and their input to quality nursing care acknowledged. Positive role models and learning conducive clinical environments contributed to their development.

护理专业学生培养职业尊严所需的支持。
护生在工学结合学习中的职业尊严发展依赖于专业护士的支持。如果他们得不到支持,这种发展就会受到威胁。目的本研究旨在探讨护生在工作整合学习过程中,从专业护士(包括讲师)那里获得职业尊严的需要。研究设计采用定性、探索性-描述性研究设计。通过志愿者抽样,参与者被邀请进行面对面深入的个人访谈,讨论以下问题:“在结合工作的学习过程中,你需要从别人那里得到什么支持,才能感到作为护理专业学生的尊严?”数据的饱和程度决定了参与者的数量。采访的录音和现场笔记的撰写是在参与者的许可下进行的。在专题分析中进行手工编码,以直觉和洞察力分析复杂的数据内容。研究对象和研究背景本研究是在南非的一所指定的护理教育机构和医院进行的,学生们在那里进行了大量的工作结合学习。采访了14名三年级学生。他们在与工作结合的学习方面有足够的经验,可以提供丰富的数据,说明发展职业尊严所需的支持。伦理方面的考虑比勒陀利亚大学健康科学研究伦理委员会批准了这项建议(参考编号73/2023),有关当局对开展这项研究给予了书面许可。由于参与者是学生,研究人员确保他们不觉得有义务参与。研究结果分为四个范畴,分别是(a)改善与工作结合的学习经验;(b)重视学生的专业发展;(c)合作促进学生的专业成长;(d)优化资源管理。结论应尊重学生,重视学生对护理质量的贡献。积极的榜样和有利于学习的临床环境有助于他们的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信