Financing food environments: who has the power to drive healthier food investment in Australia?

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Ashley Schram, Sharon Friel, Anne-Marie Thow, Sirinya Phulkerd, Carmen Huckel Schneider, Jeff Collin
{"title":"Financing food environments: who has the power to drive healthier food investment in Australia?","authors":"Ashley Schram, Sharon Friel, Anne-Marie Thow, Sirinya Phulkerd, Carmen Huckel Schneider, Jeff Collin","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daaf032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explores the intersection of financialization and the commercial determinants of health (CDoH), with a focus on Australian food systems. While existing research highlights the food industry's role in shaping dietary patterns and health outcomes, the financial sector's influence on food systems governance remains underexamined. By investigating key actors in food systems investment policy and practice and the types of power they wield, this study contributes to a growing body of literature on CDoH. We conducted 22 semi-structured interviews with financial (e.g. investment banks and assets managers) and non-financial (e.g. food industry, government, and civil society) actors in Australia. Applying Moon's expanded power typology, we examined how financial and non-financial actors influence food systems investment, the disruptive potential of the financial sector on established power dynamics, and implications for the healthfulness of food environments. Our results identified economic power as the foundation of influence, but network and expert power were seen as critical, especially for financial actors to get deals done. Financial actors, including the 'responsible investment' sector, were perceived as potentially disrupting traditional power dynamics dominated by transnational food companies. Financial norms and practices manifested differently among different actors and areas of food systems. Governments were viewed as largely absent, with calls for them to articulate a clear investment policy vision to guide healthier food systems. This study provides novel insights into financial sector involvement in food systems, the disruption of traditional power dynamics, and opportunities for healthier food systems while also raising risks for increased market concentration through financialization.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"40 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the intersection of financialization and the commercial determinants of health (CDoH), with a focus on Australian food systems. While existing research highlights the food industry's role in shaping dietary patterns and health outcomes, the financial sector's influence on food systems governance remains underexamined. By investigating key actors in food systems investment policy and practice and the types of power they wield, this study contributes to a growing body of literature on CDoH. We conducted 22 semi-structured interviews with financial (e.g. investment banks and assets managers) and non-financial (e.g. food industry, government, and civil society) actors in Australia. Applying Moon's expanded power typology, we examined how financial and non-financial actors influence food systems investment, the disruptive potential of the financial sector on established power dynamics, and implications for the healthfulness of food environments. Our results identified economic power as the foundation of influence, but network and expert power were seen as critical, especially for financial actors to get deals done. Financial actors, including the 'responsible investment' sector, were perceived as potentially disrupting traditional power dynamics dominated by transnational food companies. Financial norms and practices manifested differently among different actors and areas of food systems. Governments were viewed as largely absent, with calls for them to articulate a clear investment policy vision to guide healthier food systems. This study provides novel insights into financial sector involvement in food systems, the disruption of traditional power dynamics, and opportunities for healthier food systems while also raising risks for increased market concentration through financialization.

食品环境融资:谁有权力在澳大利亚推动更健康的食品投资?
本文探讨了金融化和健康的商业决定因素(CDoH)的交集,重点是澳大利亚的食品系统。虽然现有研究强调了食品工业在塑造饮食模式和健康结果方面的作用,但金融部门对食品系统治理的影响仍未得到充分研究。通过调查粮食系统投资政策和实践中的关键行为者以及他们行使的权力类型,本研究有助于增加关于CDoH的文献。我们对澳大利亚的金融(如投资银行和资产管理公司)和非金融(如食品行业、政府和民间社会)参与者进行了22次半结构化访谈。运用Moon的扩展权力类型学,我们研究了金融和非金融行为者如何影响粮食系统投资,金融部门对既定权力动态的破坏性潜力,以及对食品环境健康的影响。我们的研究结果表明,经济实力是影响力的基础,但网络和专家实力被认为是至关重要的,尤其是对金融行为者达成交易而言。金融行为者,包括“负责任投资”部门,被认为有可能破坏由跨国食品公司主导的传统权力格局。在粮食系统的不同行为体和领域中,财务规范和做法表现不同。各国政府被视为基本缺席,呼吁它们阐明明确的投资政策愿景,以指导更健康的粮食体系。本研究对金融部门参与粮食系统、传统权力动态的破坏以及更健康粮食系统的机会提供了新的见解,同时也增加了通过金融化提高市场集中度的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion International
Health Promotion International Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信