Practising and Tolerating Conscientious Objection in Healthcare: A Brief Defence.

IF 1.3 4区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS
Helen Watt
{"title":"Practising and Tolerating Conscientious Objection in Healthcare: A Brief Defence.","authors":"Helen Watt","doi":"10.1007/s10730-025-09548-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conscientious objection in healthcare is important for at least two reasons: the need for healthcare workers to be conscientious people-even where their objections are mistaken-and their need to respect the core values of their professions. Conscientious objection can be nuanced and/or unexpected: sometimes it is being confronted with a situation in a visceral way that leads to the objection, including after the healthcare worker has already been involved in the practice concerned. Referral to a non-objecting practitioner is often expected but goes against the logic of much conscientious objection: healthcare workers who see some intervention as unjustifiably harmful may not wish to intend its performance by others or even its pursuit. In the end, healthcare professionals need the virtue of conscientiousness: this is necessary, albeit not sufficient, for them to act well in their roles. As patients we also need conscientious professionals: even if their response may occasionally do us harm, the fact the healthcare worker is unwilling to act unethically as she sees it is a valuable and crucial character trait.</p>","PeriodicalId":46160,"journal":{"name":"Hec Forum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hec Forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-025-09548-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conscientious objection in healthcare is important for at least two reasons: the need for healthcare workers to be conscientious people-even where their objections are mistaken-and their need to respect the core values of their professions. Conscientious objection can be nuanced and/or unexpected: sometimes it is being confronted with a situation in a visceral way that leads to the objection, including after the healthcare worker has already been involved in the practice concerned. Referral to a non-objecting practitioner is often expected but goes against the logic of much conscientious objection: healthcare workers who see some intervention as unjustifiably harmful may not wish to intend its performance by others or even its pursuit. In the end, healthcare professionals need the virtue of conscientiousness: this is necessary, albeit not sufficient, for them to act well in their roles. As patients we also need conscientious professionals: even if their response may occasionally do us harm, the fact the healthcare worker is unwilling to act unethically as she sees it is a valuable and crucial character trait.

在医疗保健实践和容忍良心反对:一个简短的辩护。
出于良心反对在医疗保健中是重要的,至少有两个原因:医疗工作者需要成为有良心的人——即使他们的反对是错误的——以及他们需要尊重他们职业的核心价值。良心反对可能是微妙的和/或意想不到的:有时它是面对一种情况,以一种本能的方式导致反对,包括在卫生保健工作者已经参与了有关的实践之后。转介给没有反对意见的医生通常是意料之中的,但这违背了许多良心反对的逻辑:认为某些干预是不合理的有害的卫生保健工作者可能不希望别人来实施,甚至不希望别人来实施。最后,医疗保健专业人员需要尽责的美德:这是必要的,尽管不是充分的,让他们做好自己的角色。作为病人,我们也需要有责任心的专业人员:即使他们的反应偶尔会伤害我们,但医护人员不愿意在她看来不道德的行为是一种有价值和至关重要的性格特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hec Forum
Hec Forum ETHICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: HEC Forum is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to practicing physicians, nurses, social workers, risk managers, attorneys, ethicists, and other HEC committee members. Contributions are welcomed from any pertinent source, but the text should be written to be appreciated by HEC members and lay readers. HEC Forum publishes essays, research papers, and features the following sections:Essays on Substantive Bioethical/Health Law Issues Analyses of Procedural or Operational Committee Issues Document Exchange Special Articles International Perspectives Mt./St. Anonymous: Cases and Institutional Policies Point/Counterpoint Argumentation Case Reviews, Analyses, and Resolutions Chairperson''s Section `Tough Spot'' Critical Annotations Health Law Alert Network News Letters to the Editors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信