CTLA-4-two pathways to anti-tumour immunity?

IF 4.1 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Immunotherapy advances Pub Date : 2025-03-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/immadv/ltaf008
Frank J Ward, Paul T Kennedy, Farah Al-Fatyan, Lekh N Dahal, Rasha Abu-Eid
{"title":"CTLA-4-two pathways to anti-tumour immunity?","authors":"Frank J Ward, Paul T Kennedy, Farah Al-Fatyan, Lekh N Dahal, Rasha Abu-Eid","doi":"10.1093/immadv/ltaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have revolutionized cancer therapy and improved patient outcomes in a range of cancers. ICIs enhance anti-tumour immunity by targeting the inhibitory checkpoint receptors CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1, and LAG-3. Despite their success, efficacy, and tolerance vary between patients, raising new challenges to improve these therapies. These could be addressed by the identification of robust biomarkers to predict patient outcome and a more complete understanding of how ICIs affect and are affected by the tumour microenvironment (TME). Despite being the first ICIs to be introduced, anti-CTLA-4 antibodies have underperformed compared with antibodies that target the PD-1/PDL-1 axis. This is due to the complexity regarding their precise mechanism of action, with two possible routes to efficacy identified. The first is a direct enhancement of effector T-cell responses through simple blockade of CTLA-4-'releasing the brakes', while the second requires prior elimination of regulatory T cells (T<sub>REG</sub>) to allow emergence of T-cell-mediated destruction of tumour cells. We examine evidence indicating both mechanisms exist but offer different antagonistic characteristics. Further, we investigate the potential of the soluble isoform of CTLA-4, sCTLA-4, as a confounding factor for current therapies, but also as a therapeutic for delivering antigen-specific anti-tumour immunity.</p>","PeriodicalId":73353,"journal":{"name":"Immunotherapy advances","volume":"5 1","pages":"ltaf008"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12012449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunotherapy advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/immadv/ltaf008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have revolutionized cancer therapy and improved patient outcomes in a range of cancers. ICIs enhance anti-tumour immunity by targeting the inhibitory checkpoint receptors CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1, and LAG-3. Despite their success, efficacy, and tolerance vary between patients, raising new challenges to improve these therapies. These could be addressed by the identification of robust biomarkers to predict patient outcome and a more complete understanding of how ICIs affect and are affected by the tumour microenvironment (TME). Despite being the first ICIs to be introduced, anti-CTLA-4 antibodies have underperformed compared with antibodies that target the PD-1/PDL-1 axis. This is due to the complexity regarding their precise mechanism of action, with two possible routes to efficacy identified. The first is a direct enhancement of effector T-cell responses through simple blockade of CTLA-4-'releasing the brakes', while the second requires prior elimination of regulatory T cells (TREG) to allow emergence of T-cell-mediated destruction of tumour cells. We examine evidence indicating both mechanisms exist but offer different antagonistic characteristics. Further, we investigate the potential of the soluble isoform of CTLA-4, sCTLA-4, as a confounding factor for current therapies, but also as a therapeutic for delivering antigen-specific anti-tumour immunity.

ctla -4-两种抗肿瘤免疫途径?
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)疗法已经彻底改变了癌症治疗并改善了一系列癌症患者的预后。ICIs通过靶向抑制检查点受体CTLA-4、PD-1、PD-L1和LAG-3来增强抗肿瘤免疫。尽管这些疗法取得了成功,但疗效和耐受性因患者而异,这为改进这些疗法提出了新的挑战。这些问题可以通过确定可靠的生物标志物来预测患者预后,以及更全面地了解ici如何影响肿瘤微环境(TME)和被肿瘤微环境(TME)影响来解决。尽管抗ctla -4抗体是第一个被引入的ici,但与靶向PD-1/PDL-1轴的抗体相比,抗ctla -4抗体的表现不佳。这是由于其精确作用机制的复杂性,确定了两种可能的功效途径。第一种方法是通过简单地阻断CTLA-4来直接增强效应T细胞的反应——“释放刹车”,而第二种方法需要事先消除调节性T细胞(TREG),以允许T细胞介导的肿瘤细胞破坏的出现。我们检查证据表明这两种机制存在,但提供不同的拮抗特性。此外,我们研究了CTLA-4的可溶性异构体sCTLA-4的潜力,作为当前治疗的混杂因素,但也作为提供抗原特异性抗肿瘤免疫的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信