Racial, Ethnic, and Sex Differences in Need and Receipt of Support for Social Needs Among Veterans.

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
David A Frank, Lauren E Russell, Gregory T Procario, Sarah M Leder, Jennifer L McCoy, Shane Lamba, Ernest M Moy, Leslie R M Hausmann
{"title":"Racial, Ethnic, and Sex Differences in Need and Receipt of Support for Social Needs Among Veterans.","authors":"David A Frank, Lauren E Russell, Gregory T Procario, Sarah M Leder, Jennifer L McCoy, Shane Lamba, Ernest M Moy, Leslie R M Hausmann","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Health-related social needs, downstream manifestations of social determinants or drivers of health, impact patients' health and well-being. To develop equity-driven social care interventions, health care systems must apply an intersectional equity lens when assessing patients' social needs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate racial, ethnic, and sex differences in social needs and receipt of support among veterans receiving health care in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A cross-sectional survey study of VHA primary care patients seen in January or February 2023 was carried out in a national sample of veterans, stratified by race and ethnicity (Black, Hispanic, White), and sex (male, female). Participants were invited by mail to complete a survey online or by mail. Of those invited (N = 38 759), 7095 (18.3%) responded. Data collection occurred from March 2, 2023, through May 9, 2023. Analyses were conducted from February 15, 2024, through July 16, 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Intersection of self-identified race, ethnicity, and sex.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Age-adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) of reported need for and receipt of support across 13 social need domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses included 6611 respondents representing 939 467 veterans (unweighted No. of participants [weighted %]; 1089 [4.1%] Black women; 1144 [19.4%] Black men; 941 [1.6%] Hispanic women; 1281 [11.3%] Hispanic men; 805 [5.3%] White women; 1351 [58.4%] White men). After age adjustment, compared with White men, Black men had significantly higher aPRs of need for support in all domains except childcare and employment (aPRs ranged from 1.35 [95% CI, 1.09-1.69] for social isolation to 2.73 [95% CI, 1.89-3.95] for managing discrimination). Hispanic women had higher aPRs in 8 domains: childcare (aPR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.19-6.48), discrimination (aPR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.68-4.29), internet (aPR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.17-2.79), housing (aPR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.10-2.99), legal issues (aPR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.02-2.84), loneliness (aPR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.28-2.18), food (aPR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.03-2.35), and social isolation (aPR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.05-1.87). Black women had higher aPRs for discrimination (aPR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.82-3.95), legal issues (aPR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.40-2.97), food (aPR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.28-2.37), loneliness (aPR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.28-2.01), paying for basics (aPR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.15-2.14), and social isolation (aPR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18-1.87). Hispanic men had higher aPRs for housing (aPR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.18-3.02), legal issues (aPR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.14-2.86), internet (aPR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.13-2.16), and loneliness (aPR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.10-1.88). White women had higher aPRs for childcare (aPR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.36-8.35) and discrimination (aPR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.03-2.50). There was 1 significant difference in receiving support: Black women had a lower prevalence of receiving support for work (aPR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35-0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study found that there was wide variation in the health-related social need domains in which VHA race, ethnicity, and sex subpopulations reported needing support. Applying an intersectional lens when evaluating social needs lays the groundwork for equity-guided social care interventions in the VHA.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 5","pages":"e250992"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Health-related social needs, downstream manifestations of social determinants or drivers of health, impact patients' health and well-being. To develop equity-driven social care interventions, health care systems must apply an intersectional equity lens when assessing patients' social needs.

Objective: To evaluate racial, ethnic, and sex differences in social needs and receipt of support among veterans receiving health care in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

Design, setting, and participants: A cross-sectional survey study of VHA primary care patients seen in January or February 2023 was carried out in a national sample of veterans, stratified by race and ethnicity (Black, Hispanic, White), and sex (male, female). Participants were invited by mail to complete a survey online or by mail. Of those invited (N = 38 759), 7095 (18.3%) responded. Data collection occurred from March 2, 2023, through May 9, 2023. Analyses were conducted from February 15, 2024, through July 16, 2024.

Exposures: Intersection of self-identified race, ethnicity, and sex.

Main outcomes and measures: Age-adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) of reported need for and receipt of support across 13 social need domains.

Results: Analyses included 6611 respondents representing 939 467 veterans (unweighted No. of participants [weighted %]; 1089 [4.1%] Black women; 1144 [19.4%] Black men; 941 [1.6%] Hispanic women; 1281 [11.3%] Hispanic men; 805 [5.3%] White women; 1351 [58.4%] White men). After age adjustment, compared with White men, Black men had significantly higher aPRs of need for support in all domains except childcare and employment (aPRs ranged from 1.35 [95% CI, 1.09-1.69] for social isolation to 2.73 [95% CI, 1.89-3.95] for managing discrimination). Hispanic women had higher aPRs in 8 domains: childcare (aPR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.19-6.48), discrimination (aPR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.68-4.29), internet (aPR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.17-2.79), housing (aPR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.10-2.99), legal issues (aPR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.02-2.84), loneliness (aPR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.28-2.18), food (aPR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.03-2.35), and social isolation (aPR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.05-1.87). Black women had higher aPRs for discrimination (aPR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.82-3.95), legal issues (aPR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.40-2.97), food (aPR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.28-2.37), loneliness (aPR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.28-2.01), paying for basics (aPR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.15-2.14), and social isolation (aPR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18-1.87). Hispanic men had higher aPRs for housing (aPR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.18-3.02), legal issues (aPR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.14-2.86), internet (aPR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.13-2.16), and loneliness (aPR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.10-1.88). White women had higher aPRs for childcare (aPR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.36-8.35) and discrimination (aPR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.03-2.50). There was 1 significant difference in receiving support: Black women had a lower prevalence of receiving support for work (aPR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35-0.94).

Conclusions and relevance: This study found that there was wide variation in the health-related social need domains in which VHA race, ethnicity, and sex subpopulations reported needing support. Applying an intersectional lens when evaluating social needs lays the groundwork for equity-guided social care interventions in the VHA.

退伍军人社会需求的种族、民族和性别差异。
重要性:与健康有关的社会需求是健康的社会决定因素或驱动因素的下游表现,影响患者的健康和福祉。为了发展公平驱动的社会护理干预措施,卫生保健系统在评估患者的社会需求时必须采用交叉公平的视角。目的:评价在退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)接受医疗保健的退伍军人在社会需求和获得支持方面的种族、民族和性别差异。设计、环境和参与者:在全国退伍军人样本中对2023年1月或2月的VHA初级保健患者进行了横断面调查研究,按种族和民族(黑人、西班牙裔、白人)和性别(男性、女性)分层。通过邮件邀请参与者在线或通过邮件完成调查。在受邀者(N = 38 759)中,有7095人(18.3%)做出了回应。数据收集时间为2023年3月2日至2023年5月9日。分析时间为2024年2月15日至2024年7月16日。暴露:自我认同的种族、民族和性别的交集。主要结果和措施:13个社会需求领域报告的需求和获得支持的年龄调整患病率(aPR)。结果:分析包括6611名受访者,代表939名 467名退伍军人(未加权编号)。参与者的[加权%];1089[4.1%]黑人女性;黑人1144人[19.4%];西班牙裔女性941人(1.6%);西班牙裔男性1281人(11.3%);白人女性805名[5.3%];1351[58.4%]白人男性)。年龄调整后,与白人男性相比,黑人男性在除儿童保育和就业以外的所有领域的支持需求的apr显著更高(apr范围从社会隔离的1.35 [95% CI, 1.09-1.69]到管理歧视的2.73 [95% CI, 1.89-3.95])。西班牙裔女性在8个领域的aPR较高:儿童保育(aPR, 2.78;95% CI, 1.19-6.48),鉴别度(aPR, 2.69;95% CI, 1.68-4.29),互联网(aPR, 1.81;95% CI, 1.17-2.79),住房(aPR, 1.81;95% CI, 1.10-2.99),法律问题(aPR, 1.70;95% CI, 1.02-2.84),孤独(aPR, 1.67;95% CI, 1.28-2.18),食物(aPR, 1.55;95% CI, 1.03-2.35)和社会隔离(aPR, 1.40;95% ci, 1.05-1.87)。黑人女性遭受歧视的aPR较高(aPR, 2.68;95% CI, 1.82-3.95),法律问题(aPR, 2.04;95% CI, 1.40-2.97),食物(aPR, 1.74;95% CI, 1.28-2.37),孤独(aPR, 1.60;95% CI, 1.28-2.01),支付基本费用(aPR, 1.57;95% CI, 1.15-2.14)和社会隔离(aPR, 1.48;95% ci, 1.18-1.87)。西班牙裔男性在住房方面的aPR更高(aPR, 1.88;95% CI, 1.18-3.02),法律问题(aPR, 1.81;95% CI, 1.14-2.86),互联网(aPR, 1.56;95% CI, 1.13-2.16)和孤独感(aPR, 1.44;95% ci, 1.10-1.88)。白人女性在育儿方面的aPR较高(aPR, 3.37;95% CI, 1.36-8.35)和判别(aPR, 1.60;95% ci, 1.03-2.50)。在接受支持方面有1个显著差异:黑人女性接受工作支持的患病率较低(aPR, 0.58;95% ci, 0.35-0.94)。结论和相关性:本研究发现,在VHA种族、民族和性别亚人群报告的与健康相关的社会需求领域存在很大差异。在评估社会需求时应用交叉视角为VHA中公平导向的社会护理干预奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信