David A Frank, Lauren E Russell, Gregory T Procario, Sarah M Leder, Jennifer L McCoy, Shane Lamba, Ernest M Moy, Leslie R M Hausmann
{"title":"Racial, Ethnic, and Sex Differences in Need and Receipt of Support for Social Needs Among Veterans.","authors":"David A Frank, Lauren E Russell, Gregory T Procario, Sarah M Leder, Jennifer L McCoy, Shane Lamba, Ernest M Moy, Leslie R M Hausmann","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Health-related social needs, downstream manifestations of social determinants or drivers of health, impact patients' health and well-being. To develop equity-driven social care interventions, health care systems must apply an intersectional equity lens when assessing patients' social needs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate racial, ethnic, and sex differences in social needs and receipt of support among veterans receiving health care in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A cross-sectional survey study of VHA primary care patients seen in January or February 2023 was carried out in a national sample of veterans, stratified by race and ethnicity (Black, Hispanic, White), and sex (male, female). Participants were invited by mail to complete a survey online or by mail. Of those invited (N = 38 759), 7095 (18.3%) responded. Data collection occurred from March 2, 2023, through May 9, 2023. Analyses were conducted from February 15, 2024, through July 16, 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Intersection of self-identified race, ethnicity, and sex.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Age-adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) of reported need for and receipt of support across 13 social need domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses included 6611 respondents representing 939 467 veterans (unweighted No. of participants [weighted %]; 1089 [4.1%] Black women; 1144 [19.4%] Black men; 941 [1.6%] Hispanic women; 1281 [11.3%] Hispanic men; 805 [5.3%] White women; 1351 [58.4%] White men). After age adjustment, compared with White men, Black men had significantly higher aPRs of need for support in all domains except childcare and employment (aPRs ranged from 1.35 [95% CI, 1.09-1.69] for social isolation to 2.73 [95% CI, 1.89-3.95] for managing discrimination). Hispanic women had higher aPRs in 8 domains: childcare (aPR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.19-6.48), discrimination (aPR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.68-4.29), internet (aPR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.17-2.79), housing (aPR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.10-2.99), legal issues (aPR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.02-2.84), loneliness (aPR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.28-2.18), food (aPR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.03-2.35), and social isolation (aPR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.05-1.87). Black women had higher aPRs for discrimination (aPR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.82-3.95), legal issues (aPR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.40-2.97), food (aPR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.28-2.37), loneliness (aPR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.28-2.01), paying for basics (aPR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.15-2.14), and social isolation (aPR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18-1.87). Hispanic men had higher aPRs for housing (aPR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.18-3.02), legal issues (aPR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.14-2.86), internet (aPR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.13-2.16), and loneliness (aPR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.10-1.88). White women had higher aPRs for childcare (aPR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.36-8.35) and discrimination (aPR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.03-2.50). There was 1 significant difference in receiving support: Black women had a lower prevalence of receiving support for work (aPR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35-0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study found that there was wide variation in the health-related social need domains in which VHA race, ethnicity, and sex subpopulations reported needing support. Applying an intersectional lens when evaluating social needs lays the groundwork for equity-guided social care interventions in the VHA.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 5","pages":"e250992"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Importance: Health-related social needs, downstream manifestations of social determinants or drivers of health, impact patients' health and well-being. To develop equity-driven social care interventions, health care systems must apply an intersectional equity lens when assessing patients' social needs.
Objective: To evaluate racial, ethnic, and sex differences in social needs and receipt of support among veterans receiving health care in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).
Design, setting, and participants: A cross-sectional survey study of VHA primary care patients seen in January or February 2023 was carried out in a national sample of veterans, stratified by race and ethnicity (Black, Hispanic, White), and sex (male, female). Participants were invited by mail to complete a survey online or by mail. Of those invited (N = 38 759), 7095 (18.3%) responded. Data collection occurred from March 2, 2023, through May 9, 2023. Analyses were conducted from February 15, 2024, through July 16, 2024.
Exposures: Intersection of self-identified race, ethnicity, and sex.
Main outcomes and measures: Age-adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) of reported need for and receipt of support across 13 social need domains.
Results: Analyses included 6611 respondents representing 939 467 veterans (unweighted No. of participants [weighted %]; 1089 [4.1%] Black women; 1144 [19.4%] Black men; 941 [1.6%] Hispanic women; 1281 [11.3%] Hispanic men; 805 [5.3%] White women; 1351 [58.4%] White men). After age adjustment, compared with White men, Black men had significantly higher aPRs of need for support in all domains except childcare and employment (aPRs ranged from 1.35 [95% CI, 1.09-1.69] for social isolation to 2.73 [95% CI, 1.89-3.95] for managing discrimination). Hispanic women had higher aPRs in 8 domains: childcare (aPR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.19-6.48), discrimination (aPR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.68-4.29), internet (aPR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.17-2.79), housing (aPR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.10-2.99), legal issues (aPR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.02-2.84), loneliness (aPR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.28-2.18), food (aPR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.03-2.35), and social isolation (aPR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.05-1.87). Black women had higher aPRs for discrimination (aPR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.82-3.95), legal issues (aPR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.40-2.97), food (aPR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.28-2.37), loneliness (aPR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.28-2.01), paying for basics (aPR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.15-2.14), and social isolation (aPR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18-1.87). Hispanic men had higher aPRs for housing (aPR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.18-3.02), legal issues (aPR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.14-2.86), internet (aPR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.13-2.16), and loneliness (aPR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.10-1.88). White women had higher aPRs for childcare (aPR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.36-8.35) and discrimination (aPR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.03-2.50). There was 1 significant difference in receiving support: Black women had a lower prevalence of receiving support for work (aPR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35-0.94).
Conclusions and relevance: This study found that there was wide variation in the health-related social need domains in which VHA race, ethnicity, and sex subpopulations reported needing support. Applying an intersectional lens when evaluating social needs lays the groundwork for equity-guided social care interventions in the VHA.
期刊介绍:
JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform.
In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations.
JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.