[Unplanned redo surgeries after appendectomy characterizing the quality of acute appendicitis management].

Q4 Medicine
I A Matveev, I B Popov, A A Baradulin, A V Dmitriev, S V Lipovoy, A I Matveev, A O Matreninskikh
{"title":"[Unplanned redo surgeries after appendectomy characterizing the quality of acute appendicitis management].","authors":"I A Matveev, I B Popov, A A Baradulin, A V Dmitriev, S V Lipovoy, A I Matveev, A O Matreninskikh","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202505129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the effect of appendectomy technique on the incidence, causes and features of redo surgeries after appendectomy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Appendectomies were performed in 1114 patients. Repeated interventions were necessary in 19 (1.4%) people (10 (2.0%) patients after laparoscopic appendectomy and 9 (1.5%) patients after open surgery). Structure, surgical features and results are estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 505 (45.3%) laparoscopic and 609 (54.7%) open appendectomies. Repeated interventions were performed in 10 (0.9%) and 9 (1.5%) cases, respectively. The causes of repeated surgeries were abdominal infectious complications in 7 (0.6%) cases, intra-abdominal bleeding in 5 people (0.4%), abdominal wall infection in 3 (0.3%) cases, eventeration in 4 (0.35%) cases, undiagnosed intestinal obstruction during index surgery in 1 patient (0.1%) and severe abdominal pain in 1 patient (0.1%). There were complications Clavien-Dindo grade IIIA-IIIB. There were no fatal outcomes. In 2023-2024, 286 laparoscopic appendectomies were performed including 2 (0.69%) repeated interventions. The number of laparoscopic interventions throughout this period exceeded the number of open appendectomies by 2.4 times and amounted to 81.7% of all appendectomies. Repeated interventions after traditional appendectomy were performed in 2 patients (3.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Predominant laparoscopic appendectomies in recent years improved the quality of care for patients with acute appendicitis regarding redo surgeries. Acceptable incidence of repeated interventions indicates sufficient institutional experience in the treatment of acute appendicitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 5","pages":"29-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khirurgiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202505129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To study the effect of appendectomy technique on the incidence, causes and features of redo surgeries after appendectomy.

Material and methods: Appendectomies were performed in 1114 patients. Repeated interventions were necessary in 19 (1.4%) people (10 (2.0%) patients after laparoscopic appendectomy and 9 (1.5%) patients after open surgery). Structure, surgical features and results are estimated.

Results: There were 505 (45.3%) laparoscopic and 609 (54.7%) open appendectomies. Repeated interventions were performed in 10 (0.9%) and 9 (1.5%) cases, respectively. The causes of repeated surgeries were abdominal infectious complications in 7 (0.6%) cases, intra-abdominal bleeding in 5 people (0.4%), abdominal wall infection in 3 (0.3%) cases, eventeration in 4 (0.35%) cases, undiagnosed intestinal obstruction during index surgery in 1 patient (0.1%) and severe abdominal pain in 1 patient (0.1%). There were complications Clavien-Dindo grade IIIA-IIIB. There were no fatal outcomes. In 2023-2024, 286 laparoscopic appendectomies were performed including 2 (0.69%) repeated interventions. The number of laparoscopic interventions throughout this period exceeded the number of open appendectomies by 2.4 times and amounted to 81.7% of all appendectomies. Repeated interventions after traditional appendectomy were performed in 2 patients (3.1%).

Conclusion: Predominant laparoscopic appendectomies in recent years improved the quality of care for patients with acute appendicitis regarding redo surgeries. Acceptable incidence of repeated interventions indicates sufficient institutional experience in the treatment of acute appendicitis.

[阑尾切除术后意外重做手术对急性阑尾炎处理质量的影响]。
目的:探讨阑尾切除术技术对阑尾切除术后重做手术的发生率、原因及特点的影响。材料和方法:1114例患者行阑尾切除术。19例(1.4%)患者需要重复干预(腹腔镜阑尾切除术10例(2.0%),开放手术9例(1.5%))。对结构、手术特征和结果进行估计。结果:腹腔镜阑尾切除术505例(45.3%),开放式阑尾切除术609例(54.7%)。重复干预分别为10例(0.9%)和9例(1.5%)。重复手术的原因为腹腔感染并发症7例(0.6%),腹腔内出血5例(0.4%),腹壁感染3例(0.3%),肠穿孔4例(0.35%),指数手术中未确诊肠梗阻1例(0.1%),剧烈腹痛1例(0.1%)。并发症Clavien-Dindo分级为IIIA-IIIB。没有致命的结果。2023-2024年共行腹腔镜阑尾切除术286例,其中重复干预2例(0.69%)。在此期间,腹腔镜干预次数是开放阑尾手术次数的2.4倍,占所有阑尾手术的81.7%。2例(3.1%)患者在传统阑尾切除术后进行了重复干预。结论:近年来以腹腔镜阑尾切除术为主,提高了急性阑尾炎患者重做手术的护理质量。可接受的重复干预发生率表明在治疗急性阑尾炎方面有足够的机构经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Khirurgiya
Khirurgiya Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: Хирургия отдельных областей сердце, сосуды легкие пищевод молочная железа желудок и двенадцатиперстная кишка кишечник желчевыводящие пути печень
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信