{"title":"[Spatial Resolution and Uniformity of a Full-ring CZT SPECT/CT System: Comparison with a Conventional Anger-type SPECT/CT Instrument].","authors":"Takashi Takeuchi, Yoshitaka Tanaka, Yasuhiro Kodama, Hayato Odagiri","doi":"10.6009/jjrt.25-1527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>StarGuide (GE HealthCare, Haifa, Israel) is a full-ring SPECT/CT system based on Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CZT) technology. In this study, we aimed to compare the image quality of this CZT-based SPECT/CT to a conventional Anger-type SPECT/CT system (NM/CT 870 DR, 870DR; GE HealthCare).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tomographic sensitivity was calculated by recording the total number of counts detected during tomographic acquisition for a point source. We evaluated spatial resolution and image uniformity on each system using the full width half maximum (FWHM) of line sources and root mean square uniformity (%RMSU) of pool phantom, respectively. The voxel size of the StarGuide SPECT images was 2.46×2.46×2.46 mm<sup>3</sup>, compared to 4.42×4.42×4.42 mm<sup>3</sup> on 870DR. These projection data were reconstructed using 3D-OSEM with a resolution recovery technique (RR). We compared 3 different algorithms: non-correction (NCRR), scatter correction (SCRR), and attenuation correction and scatter correction (ACSCRR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tomographic sensitivity of StarGuide and 870DR were estimated at 200.0 counts・s<sup>-1</sup>・MBq<sup>-1</sup> and 193.3 counts・s<sup>-1</sup>・MBq<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. Spatial resolution at the center of the FOV was estimated at 2.6 mm for StarGuide and 5.4 mm for 870DR with ACSCRR. Likewise, the %RMSU was 21.7 for StarGuide and 24.6 for 870DR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The full-ring CZT SPECT/CT system has a superior spatial resolution and better image uniformity than the conventional Anger-type SPECT instrument, whereas tomographic sensitivity remains similar.</p>","PeriodicalId":74309,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","volume":"81 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.25-1527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: StarGuide (GE HealthCare, Haifa, Israel) is a full-ring SPECT/CT system based on Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CZT) technology. In this study, we aimed to compare the image quality of this CZT-based SPECT/CT to a conventional Anger-type SPECT/CT system (NM/CT 870 DR, 870DR; GE HealthCare).
Methods: Tomographic sensitivity was calculated by recording the total number of counts detected during tomographic acquisition for a point source. We evaluated spatial resolution and image uniformity on each system using the full width half maximum (FWHM) of line sources and root mean square uniformity (%RMSU) of pool phantom, respectively. The voxel size of the StarGuide SPECT images was 2.46×2.46×2.46 mm3, compared to 4.42×4.42×4.42 mm3 on 870DR. These projection data were reconstructed using 3D-OSEM with a resolution recovery technique (RR). We compared 3 different algorithms: non-correction (NCRR), scatter correction (SCRR), and attenuation correction and scatter correction (ACSCRR).
Results: Tomographic sensitivity of StarGuide and 870DR were estimated at 200.0 counts・s-1・MBq-1 and 193.3 counts・s-1・MBq-1, respectively. Spatial resolution at the center of the FOV was estimated at 2.6 mm for StarGuide and 5.4 mm for 870DR with ACSCRR. Likewise, the %RMSU was 21.7 for StarGuide and 24.6 for 870DR.
Conclusion: The full-ring CZT SPECT/CT system has a superior spatial resolution and better image uniformity than the conventional Anger-type SPECT instrument, whereas tomographic sensitivity remains similar.