Survey Practice in Non-Survey-Literate Populations: Lessons Learned from a Cognitive Interview Study in Brazil.

Survey practice Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-02 DOI:10.29115/SP-2024-0035
Meredith Massey
{"title":"Survey Practice in Non-Survey-Literate Populations: Lessons Learned from a Cognitive Interview Study in Brazil.","authors":"Meredith Massey","doi":"10.29115/SP-2024-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Survey research relies on cooperation and coordination between researchers and respondents. Survey-literate respondents possess a level of understanding of the survey process that facilitates their participation. Non-survey-literate respondents, on the other hand, are less equipped to provide accurate responses, which can lead to increased survey error. In this article, we present findings from a cognitive interview project conducted in Brazil to illustrate potential barriers to respondent participation and demonstrate how these barriers contribute to response error. To test questions on inclusive education, researchers from the Collaborating Center for Questionnaire Design and Evaluation Research at the National Center for Health Statistics facilitated the collection of data through 80 cognitive interviews conducted in various neighborhoods in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Recruitment targeted caregivers of children with and without disabilities, and respondents were predominantly female with low literacy levels. The results indicated that respondents with limited familiarity with the survey process (non-survey-literate) struggled to orient themselves to the survey task. They faced challenges in choosing response options, understanding scale relationships, and interpreting vocabulary. Additionally, many respondents expressed a need to share salient details of their lives, which the survey was not designed to capture. Understanding these barriers to participation and identifying ways to mitigate them can help reduce survey error, particularly in vulnerable populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":74893,"journal":{"name":"Survey practice","volume":"19 SI","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11987661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2024-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Survey research relies on cooperation and coordination between researchers and respondents. Survey-literate respondents possess a level of understanding of the survey process that facilitates their participation. Non-survey-literate respondents, on the other hand, are less equipped to provide accurate responses, which can lead to increased survey error. In this article, we present findings from a cognitive interview project conducted in Brazil to illustrate potential barriers to respondent participation and demonstrate how these barriers contribute to response error. To test questions on inclusive education, researchers from the Collaborating Center for Questionnaire Design and Evaluation Research at the National Center for Health Statistics facilitated the collection of data through 80 cognitive interviews conducted in various neighborhoods in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Recruitment targeted caregivers of children with and without disabilities, and respondents were predominantly female with low literacy levels. The results indicated that respondents with limited familiarity with the survey process (non-survey-literate) struggled to orient themselves to the survey task. They faced challenges in choosing response options, understanding scale relationships, and interpreting vocabulary. Additionally, many respondents expressed a need to share salient details of their lives, which the survey was not designed to capture. Understanding these barriers to participation and identifying ways to mitigate them can help reduce survey error, particularly in vulnerable populations.

非调查文化人群的调查实践:从巴西认知访谈研究中获得的经验教训。
调查研究依赖于研究者和被调查者之间的合作和协调。具有调查知识的受访者对调查过程有一定程度的了解,这有助于他们的参与。另一方面,不了解调查的受访者提供准确回答的能力较差,这可能导致调查误差增加。在本文中,我们展示了在巴西进行的认知访谈项目的研究结果,以说明受访者参与的潜在障碍,并展示这些障碍如何导致回答错误。为了测试有关全纳教育的问题,来自国家卫生统计中心问卷设计和评估研究合作中心的研究人员通过在巴西里约热内卢的各个社区进行的80次认知访谈,促进了数据的收集。招聘目标是残疾儿童和非残疾儿童的照顾者,受访者主要是文化水平低的女性。结果表明,对调查过程熟悉程度有限的受访者(不懂调查)难以使自己适应调查任务。他们在选择回答选项、理解量表关系和解释词汇方面面临挑战。此外,许多受访者表示有必要分享他们生活中的重要细节,而调查的目的并不是为了捕捉这些细节。了解这些参与的障碍并确定减轻这些障碍的方法有助于减少调查误差,特别是在弱势群体中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信