Exploring the Endorsement of Gender Stereotypes and Physical Activity in Young Women.

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2025-03-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1089/whr.2024.0117
Melanna Cox, Paige F Richmond, Annie Shtino, John R Sirard
{"title":"Exploring the Endorsement of Gender Stereotypes and Physical Activity in Young Women.","authors":"Melanna Cox, Paige F Richmond, Annie Shtino, John R Sirard","doi":"10.1089/whr.2024.0117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical behaviors (PBs), defined as physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB), are consistently less favorable in women than men. Extensive qualitative research has identified gender norms as a well-known barrier to women's PA, but they have yet to be clearly conceptualized and quantified. The purpose of this study was to (1) investigate the relationship between benevolent sexism endorsement (BSE) and PB, (2) explore women's experiences with sexism in PA settings, and (3) identify sexism constructs within focus group discussions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants completed the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (0-5 scale) and wore a hip-worn activity monitor for 7 days. Spearman correlations were calculated between BSE and PB. A 90-minute focus group (<i>n</i> = 4) was transcribed and coded to identify themes and sexism constructs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 20, 20.7 ± 1.3 years) exceeded PA guidelines and reported low BSE scores (1.8 ± 0.76). Weak associations were found between BSE and objectively measured PA (<i>r</i> = -0.19 to <i>r</i> = -0.37) and ST (<i>r</i> = 0.14). Focus group results yielded four themes: (1) Age-Related Decline in PA, (2) Parental Roles, (3) Peer Relationships/Friendships, and (4) Physical Education Teachers/Coaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As hypothesized, associations between BSE and PA outcomes and SB were negative and positive, respectively. Focus group themes were related to benevolent sexism constructs. Future research should be conducted in larger, more diverse samples and consider other factors that may impact one's endorsement of benevolent sexism.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"6 1","pages":"249-262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12040539/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2024.0117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physical behaviors (PBs), defined as physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB), are consistently less favorable in women than men. Extensive qualitative research has identified gender norms as a well-known barrier to women's PA, but they have yet to be clearly conceptualized and quantified. The purpose of this study was to (1) investigate the relationship between benevolent sexism endorsement (BSE) and PB, (2) explore women's experiences with sexism in PA settings, and (3) identify sexism constructs within focus group discussions.

Methods: Participants completed the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (0-5 scale) and wore a hip-worn activity monitor for 7 days. Spearman correlations were calculated between BSE and PB. A 90-minute focus group (n = 4) was transcribed and coded to identify themes and sexism constructs.

Results: Participants (n = 20, 20.7 ± 1.3 years) exceeded PA guidelines and reported low BSE scores (1.8 ± 0.76). Weak associations were found between BSE and objectively measured PA (r = -0.19 to r = -0.37) and ST (r = 0.14). Focus group results yielded four themes: (1) Age-Related Decline in PA, (2) Parental Roles, (3) Peer Relationships/Friendships, and (4) Physical Education Teachers/Coaches.

Conclusion: As hypothesized, associations between BSE and PA outcomes and SB were negative and positive, respectively. Focus group themes were related to benevolent sexism constructs. Future research should be conducted in larger, more diverse samples and consider other factors that may impact one's endorsement of benevolent sexism.

探讨性别刻板印象与年轻女性体育活动的认同。
背景:身体行为(Physical behavior, PBs),定义为身体活动(Physical activity, PA)和久坐行为(久坐行为,SB),在女性中一直不如男性有利。广泛的定性研究已确定性别规范是妇女PA的一个众所周知的障碍,但尚未对其进行明确的概念化和量化。本研究的目的是:(1)探讨善意性别歧视认同(BSE)与性别歧视之间的关系;(2)探讨善意性别歧视背景下女性的性别歧视体验;(3)在焦点小组讨论中识别性别歧视建构。方法:参与者完成矛盾性别歧视量表(0-5量表),并佩戴臀部活动监测仪7天。计算BSE与PB之间的Spearman相关性。一个90分钟的焦点小组(n = 4)被转录和编码以确定主题和性别歧视结构。结果:参与者(n = 20, 20.7±1.3岁)超过了PA指南,报告的BSE评分较低(1.8±0.76)。BSE与客观测量的PA (r = -0.19 ~ -0.37)和ST (r = 0.14)之间存在弱关联。焦点小组的结果产生了四个主题:(1)与年龄相关的PA下降,(2)父母角色,(3)同伴关系/友谊,以及(4)体育教师/教练。结论:正如假设的那样,BSE与PA结果和SB分别呈负相关和正相关。焦点小组主题与善意性别歧视构念有关。未来的研究应该在更大、更多样化的样本中进行,并考虑其他可能影响人们对善意性别歧视的认可的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信