Outcome Indicators for Evaluating Interventions by Advanced Practice Nurses Specialising in Acute Pain: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70201
Patricia Barroso-Castaño, Sandra Cabrera-Jaime, Maria Feijoo-Cid, Ariadna Huertas-Zurriaga, Llúcia Benito Aracil
{"title":"Outcome Indicators for Evaluating Interventions by Advanced Practice Nurses Specialising in Acute Pain: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Patricia Barroso-Castaño, Sandra Cabrera-Jaime, Maria Feijoo-Cid, Ariadna Huertas-Zurriaga, Llúcia Benito Aracil","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify outcome indicators to evaluate interventions delivered by advanced practice nurses specialising in acute pain as reported in the scientific literature.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Scoping review.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Three databases (PubMed, Scopus and CINAHL) were systematically searched in December 2023 to identify studies published between 1996 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Search results were managed through the Rayyan platform. Two review authors independently performed data selection and extraction, and a third reviewer resolved conflicts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 1263 studies. After screening titles and abstracts, 14 full-text studies were selected for data extraction and analysis. These studies encompassed a variety of designs, including randomised controlled trials, cohort studies and observational studies. The outcome indicators used to evaluate advanced practice nurses' interventions in acute pain management were examined across three key dimensions: study population and setting, intervention and model of acute pain nurse care and quality-of-care assessment. The specific outcome indicators identified included 'pain score', 'side effects', 'analgesia prescription', 'non-pharmacological interventions', 'nurses' pain management knowledge', 'patient/parent education' and 'APN contact'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review underscores the growing and evolving role of advanced practice nurses (APNs) in acute pain management, highlighting the diversity of care models and interventions implemented across clinical settings. Key outcome indicators, such as 'pain score', 'side effects' and 'nursing staff's understanding of pain management', were identified, with certain indicators, like 'APN contact' and 'non-pharmacological interventions', more closely linked to the nurse-led approach.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession: </strong>This scoping review underscores the importance of developing and evaluating outcome indicators to enhance the assessment of interventions provided by advanced practice nurses in acute pain management. While consensus on specific indicators has not yet been reached, this review highlights the need for further research to refine and standardise these indicators, thereby contributing to more uniform and comparative evaluations of care.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The identified outcome indicators can inform the evaluation of APN interventions in acute pain management, supporting efforts to optimise and standardise care. Further implementation and assessment of these indicators will be essential to enhance the quality and effectiveness of patient care.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The PRISMA extension for Scoping Review guidelines was used.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No patient or public contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"12 4","pages":"e70201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12006665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To identify outcome indicators to evaluate interventions delivered by advanced practice nurses specialising in acute pain as reported in the scientific literature.

Design: Scoping review.

Data sources: Three databases (PubMed, Scopus and CINAHL) were systematically searched in December 2023 to identify studies published between 1996 and 2023.

Review methods: Search results were managed through the Rayyan platform. Two review authors independently performed data selection and extraction, and a third reviewer resolved conflicts.

Results: The search identified 1263 studies. After screening titles and abstracts, 14 full-text studies were selected for data extraction and analysis. These studies encompassed a variety of designs, including randomised controlled trials, cohort studies and observational studies. The outcome indicators used to evaluate advanced practice nurses' interventions in acute pain management were examined across three key dimensions: study population and setting, intervention and model of acute pain nurse care and quality-of-care assessment. The specific outcome indicators identified included 'pain score', 'side effects', 'analgesia prescription', 'non-pharmacological interventions', 'nurses' pain management knowledge', 'patient/parent education' and 'APN contact'.

Conclusion: This review underscores the growing and evolving role of advanced practice nurses (APNs) in acute pain management, highlighting the diversity of care models and interventions implemented across clinical settings. Key outcome indicators, such as 'pain score', 'side effects' and 'nursing staff's understanding of pain management', were identified, with certain indicators, like 'APN contact' and 'non-pharmacological interventions', more closely linked to the nurse-led approach.

Implications for the profession: This scoping review underscores the importance of developing and evaluating outcome indicators to enhance the assessment of interventions provided by advanced practice nurses in acute pain management. While consensus on specific indicators has not yet been reached, this review highlights the need for further research to refine and standardise these indicators, thereby contributing to more uniform and comparative evaluations of care.

Impact: The identified outcome indicators can inform the evaluation of APN interventions in acute pain management, supporting efforts to optimise and standardise care. Further implementation and assessment of these indicators will be essential to enhance the quality and effectiveness of patient care.

Reporting method: The PRISMA extension for Scoping Review guidelines was used.

Patient or public contribution: No patient or public contribution.

Abstract Image

评估急性疼痛专科高级执业护士干预措施的结果指标:范围综述。
目的:确定结果指标,以评估在科学文献中报道的由专门从事急性疼痛的高级执业护士提供的干预措施。设计:范围审查。数据来源:我们于2023年12月系统检索了三个数据库(PubMed、Scopus和CINAHL),以确定1996年至2023年间发表的研究。审查方法:通过Rayyan平台对搜索结果进行管理。两位综述作者独立进行数据选择和提取,第三位综述作者解决冲突。结果:检索确定了1263项研究。筛选题目和摘要后,选取14篇全文研究进行数据提取和分析。这些研究包含多种设计,包括随机对照试验、队列研究和观察性研究。结果指标用于评估高级执业护士干预急性疼痛管理的三个关键维度:研究人群和环境,干预和急性疼痛护理模式和护理质量评估。确定的具体结果指标包括“疼痛评分”、“副作用”、“镇痛处方”、“非药物干预”、“护士疼痛管理知识”、“患者/家长教育”和“APN联系”。结论:本综述强调了高级执业护士(apn)在急性疼痛管理中的作用日益重要和不断发展,强调了在临床环境中实施的护理模式和干预措施的多样性。确定了关键结果指标,如“疼痛评分”、“副作用”和“护理人员对疼痛管理的理解”,而某些指标,如“APN接触”和“非药物干预”,与护士主导的方法联系更紧密。对专业的影响:这一范围审查强调了发展和评估结果指标的重要性,以加强对高级执业护士在急性疼痛管理中提供的干预措施的评估。虽然尚未就具体指标达成共识,但本次审查强调需要进一步研究以完善和标准化这些指标,从而有助于对护理进行更统一和可比较的评价。影响:确定的结果指标可以为急性疼痛管理中APN干预措施的评估提供信息,支持优化和标准化护理的努力。进一步实施和评估这些指标对于提高患者护理的质量和有效性至关重要。报告方法:使用PRISMA扩展范围审查指南。患者或公众捐款:没有患者或公众捐款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信