Approaches towards averting a potential structural shortage of general practitioners: results of a quantitative survey on attitudes, experiences, and ideas from general practitioners in the Federal Republic of Germany.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Julian Wangler, Stefan Claus, Michael Jansky
{"title":"Approaches towards averting a potential structural shortage of general practitioners: results of a quantitative survey on attitudes, experiences, and ideas from general practitioners in the Federal Republic of Germany.","authors":"Julian Wangler, Stefan Claus, Michael Jansky","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02840-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Securing primary care poses a complex set of challenges for policymakers in national healthcare. The risk of a shortage in general practitioners raises the question as to which approach would make an effective contribution towards averting an impending healthcare shortage. There has been a lack of studies shedding light on how general practitioners pview various approaches towards securing long-term primary care, and which measures they support from their own professional experience. The aim of the study was to ascertain the opinions, attitudes, and experiences of general practitioners in securing primary care across the country. We ran a survey to ask GPs about strategies that they saw as promising or particularly pressing, how they viewed the current situation regarding the shortage of general practitioners, and what they saw as causes for any decline they had already seen in primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our survey conducted online addressed a total of 5,164 general practitioners interviewed between August 2023 and April 2024 (40% response rate). Apart from descriptive analysis, we used Student's t-test for independent samples to determine significant differences between two groups. We also performed a factor analysis (Varimax rotation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our respondents displayed a somewhat negative view of primary care development in Germany. Many general practitioners expressed concerns as to whether primary care would remain secure in the long term. Despite partial progress, respondents saw a great need for countermeasures in the coming years. Nearly half of the respondents at 44% saw a noticeable decrease in general practices in their local area. Physicians in small towns and rural communities were more than twice as likely to experience the healthcare shortage due to a decline in general practitioners compared to their colleagues in medium-sized and large cities (42% versus 19%, p<0.001). More than half at 55% reported declining attractiveness in primary care for young physicians, which they attributed to three problem areas: 1) Position of primary care within the healthcare system, 2) Requirements for foundational and continuing medical education, 3) Working conditions. Respondents especially advocated the following approaches toward securing primary care: Establishing a primary care system (88%), more intense promotion of interest in primary care with points of contact in foundational and continuing medical education, especially in accompanying longitudinal programmes (78%), reinforcing multi-professional outpatient care centres (62%), restructuring curricula (54%) and enrolment criteria for medical study courses (51%), and reforming general medical training (55%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>General practitioners have their own proposals and preferences to add to the existing assessments and expert opinions. General practitioners should be involved more consistently than before in planning, implementing, and evaluating measures towards stabilising primary care. Various modes of participation and collaboration exist to this end.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12023567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02840-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Securing primary care poses a complex set of challenges for policymakers in national healthcare. The risk of a shortage in general practitioners raises the question as to which approach would make an effective contribution towards averting an impending healthcare shortage. There has been a lack of studies shedding light on how general practitioners pview various approaches towards securing long-term primary care, and which measures they support from their own professional experience. The aim of the study was to ascertain the opinions, attitudes, and experiences of general practitioners in securing primary care across the country. We ran a survey to ask GPs about strategies that they saw as promising or particularly pressing, how they viewed the current situation regarding the shortage of general practitioners, and what they saw as causes for any decline they had already seen in primary care.

Methods: Our survey conducted online addressed a total of 5,164 general practitioners interviewed between August 2023 and April 2024 (40% response rate). Apart from descriptive analysis, we used Student's t-test for independent samples to determine significant differences between two groups. We also performed a factor analysis (Varimax rotation).

Results: Our respondents displayed a somewhat negative view of primary care development in Germany. Many general practitioners expressed concerns as to whether primary care would remain secure in the long term. Despite partial progress, respondents saw a great need for countermeasures in the coming years. Nearly half of the respondents at 44% saw a noticeable decrease in general practices in their local area. Physicians in small towns and rural communities were more than twice as likely to experience the healthcare shortage due to a decline in general practitioners compared to their colleagues in medium-sized and large cities (42% versus 19%, p<0.001). More than half at 55% reported declining attractiveness in primary care for young physicians, which they attributed to three problem areas: 1) Position of primary care within the healthcare system, 2) Requirements for foundational and continuing medical education, 3) Working conditions. Respondents especially advocated the following approaches toward securing primary care: Establishing a primary care system (88%), more intense promotion of interest in primary care with points of contact in foundational and continuing medical education, especially in accompanying longitudinal programmes (78%), reinforcing multi-professional outpatient care centres (62%), restructuring curricula (54%) and enrolment criteria for medical study courses (51%), and reforming general medical training (55%).

Conclusions: General practitioners have their own proposals and preferences to add to the existing assessments and expert opinions. General practitioners should be involved more consistently than before in planning, implementing, and evaluating measures towards stabilising primary care. Various modes of participation and collaboration exist to this end.

避免全科医生潜在结构性短缺的方法:对德意志联邦共和国全科医生的态度、经验和想法进行定量调查的结果。
背景:确保初级保健为国家卫生保健政策制定者带来了一系列复杂的挑战。全科医生短缺的风险提出了一个问题,即哪种方法将对避免即将到来的医疗短缺做出有效贡献。对于全科医生如何看待确保长期初级保健的各种方法,以及他们从自己的专业经验中支持哪些措施,一直缺乏研究。该研究的目的是确定全国全科医生在确保初级保健方面的意见、态度和经验。我们进行了一项调查,询问全科医生他们认为有希望或特别紧迫的策略,他们如何看待目前全科医生短缺的情况,以及他们认为导致他们已经看到的初级保健下降的原因是什么。方法:我们在2023年8月至2024年4月期间对5164名全科医生进行了在线调查,回复率为40%。除了描述性分析,我们使用独立样本的学生t检验来确定两组之间的显著差异。我们还进行了因子分析(Varimax旋转)。结果:我们的调查对象对德国初级保健发展的看法有些消极。许多全科医生对初级保健能否长期保持安全表示关切。尽管取得了部分进展,答复者认为未来几年非常需要采取对策。近一半(44%)的受访者表示,他们所在地区的一般诊疗明显减少。由于全科医生人数减少,小城镇和农村社区的医生遭遇医疗短缺的可能性是中等和大城市的医生的两倍多(42%对19%)。结论:全科医生在现有评估和专家意见的基础上有自己的建议和偏好。全科医生应该比以前更一致地参与计划、实施和评估旨在稳定初级保健的措施。为此目的存在着各种参与和协作模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信