Hospital managers' experiences of conducting a root cause analysis: a case study following a sentinel event.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2025-04-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2025.1566335
Silje Liepelt, Ralf Kirchhoff
{"title":"Hospital managers' experiences of conducting a root cause analysis: a case study following a sentinel event.","authors":"Silje Liepelt, Ralf Kirchhoff","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2025.1566335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Root cause analysis (RCA) is a method used in healthcare to systematically identify and address underlying causes of adverse or sentinel events to enhance patient safety and mitigate risks. This study explores hospital managers' experiences of conducting an RCA process following a sentinel event in which a baby unexpectedly died during labor at a Norwegian hospital in 2021.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study employed a qualitative, exploratory single-case design, which involved conducting nine semi-structured interviews and analyzing documents such as the Norwegian RCA guideline, the final RCA report, and internal procedures and standards. The interviews were conducted between May and August 2021. Thematic analysis was used to organize and interpret the transcribed data. The research addressed the following question: <i>What were the hospital managers</i>' <i>experiences with conducting a root cause analysis?</i></p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two main themes emerged. The first theme<i>, challenges of and strategies for ensuring compliance with the Norwegian RCA Method,</i> captures the wide range of challenges managers experience, ranging from practical application to communication breakdowns, role ambiguity, and meeting regulatory compliance. The second theme, <i>emotional burden and support</i>, underscores the emotional strain managers endured as they navigated the grief of the personnel involved, communicating with the bereaved family, and collaborated with external agencies during the investigation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the need for more precise role definitions, better resources, and stronger emotional support systems to strengthen RCA processes. Although national RCA guidelines provide a valuable framework, real-world constraints and unique circumstances often require adaptive approaches. This study emphasizes managers' pivotal role in bridging the gap between regulatory expectations and organizational realities, underscoring the need for both practical and emotional support to ensure effective RCA implementation in sentinel events.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"5 ","pages":"1566335"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12069439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1566335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Root cause analysis (RCA) is a method used in healthcare to systematically identify and address underlying causes of adverse or sentinel events to enhance patient safety and mitigate risks. This study explores hospital managers' experiences of conducting an RCA process following a sentinel event in which a baby unexpectedly died during labor at a Norwegian hospital in 2021.

Method: The study employed a qualitative, exploratory single-case design, which involved conducting nine semi-structured interviews and analyzing documents such as the Norwegian RCA guideline, the final RCA report, and internal procedures and standards. The interviews were conducted between May and August 2021. Thematic analysis was used to organize and interpret the transcribed data. The research addressed the following question: What were the hospital managers' experiences with conducting a root cause analysis?

Results: Two main themes emerged. The first theme, challenges of and strategies for ensuring compliance with the Norwegian RCA Method, captures the wide range of challenges managers experience, ranging from practical application to communication breakdowns, role ambiguity, and meeting regulatory compliance. The second theme, emotional burden and support, underscores the emotional strain managers endured as they navigated the grief of the personnel involved, communicating with the bereaved family, and collaborated with external agencies during the investigation.

Conclusion: The findings highlight the need for more precise role definitions, better resources, and stronger emotional support systems to strengthen RCA processes. Although national RCA guidelines provide a valuable framework, real-world constraints and unique circumstances often require adaptive approaches. This study emphasizes managers' pivotal role in bridging the gap between regulatory expectations and organizational realities, underscoring the need for both practical and emotional support to ensure effective RCA implementation in sentinel events.

医院管理者进行根本原因分析的经验:前哨事件后的案例研究。
背景:根本原因分析(RCA)是一种在医疗保健中使用的方法,用于系统地识别和处理不良事件或哨点事件的潜在原因,以提高患者安全性并降低风险。本研究探讨了医院管理人员在2021年挪威一家医院发生一名婴儿在分娩期间意外死亡的哨兵事件后进行RCA流程的经验。方法:本研究采用定性、探索性的单例设计,进行了9次半结构化访谈,并分析了挪威RCA指南、最终RCA报告、内部程序和标准等文件。这些采访是在2021年5月至8月期间进行的。采用主题分析对转录数据进行整理和解释。该研究解决了以下问题:医院管理者在进行根本原因分析方面的经验是什么?结果:出现了两个主要主题。第一个主题,确保遵守挪威RCA方法的挑战和策略,抓住了管理人员经历的广泛挑战,从实际应用到沟通故障、角色模糊和满足法规遵从性。第二个主题是情绪负担和支持,强调了管理人员在处理相关人员的悲伤情绪、与遇难者家属沟通以及在调查期间与外部机构合作时所承受的情绪压力。结论:研究结果强调需要更精确的角色定义、更好的资源和更强大的情感支持系统来加强RCA过程。尽管国家RCA指南提供了一个有价值的框架,但现实世界的限制和独特的情况往往需要适应性的方法。本研究强调了管理者在弥合监管期望和组织现实之间的差距方面的关键作用,强调了实际和情感支持的必要性,以确保在前哨事件中有效实施RCA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信