Pragmatic Evaluation of an Improvement Program for People Living With Modifiable High-Risk COPD Versus Usual Care: Protocols for the Cluster Randomized PREVAIL Trial.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Katherine Hickman, Yasir Tarabichi, Andrew P Dickens, Rachel Pullen, Margee Kerr, Amy Couper, Alexander Evans, James Gatenby, Luis Alves, Cono Ariti, Mona Bafadhel, Victoria Carter, James Chalmers, Rongchang Chen, Graham Devereux, M Bradley Drummond, J Martin Gibson, David M G Halpin, MeiLan Han, Nicola A Hanania, John R Hurst, Alan Kaplan, Konstantinos Kostikas, Barry Make, Douglas Mapel, Jonathan Marshall, Fernando Martinez, Catherine Meldrum, Marije van Melle, Marc Miravitlles, Tamsin Morris, Hana Mullerova, Ruth Murray, Shigeo Muro, Clementine Nordon, Jill Ohar, Wilson Pace, Michael Pollack, Jennnifer K Quint, Anita Sharma, Dave Singh, Mukesh Singh, Frank Trudo, Dennis Williams, Tom Wilkinson, Tonya Winders, David Price
{"title":"Pragmatic Evaluation of an Improvement Program for People Living With Modifiable High-Risk COPD Versus Usual Care: Protocols for the Cluster Randomized PREVAIL Trial.","authors":"Katherine Hickman, Yasir Tarabichi, Andrew P Dickens, Rachel Pullen, Margee Kerr, Amy Couper, Alexander Evans, James Gatenby, Luis Alves, Cono Ariti, Mona Bafadhel, Victoria Carter, James Chalmers, Rongchang Chen, Graham Devereux, M Bradley Drummond, J Martin Gibson, David M G Halpin, MeiLan Han, Nicola A Hanania, John R Hurst, Alan Kaplan, Konstantinos Kostikas, Barry Make, Douglas Mapel, Jonathan Marshall, Fernando Martinez, Catherine Meldrum, Marije van Melle, Marc Miravitlles, Tamsin Morris, Hana Mullerova, Ruth Murray, Shigeo Muro, Clementine Nordon, Jill Ohar, Wilson Pace, Michael Pollack, Jennnifer K Quint, Anita Sharma, Dave Singh, Mukesh Singh, Frank Trudo, Dennis Williams, Tom Wilkinson, Tonya Winders, David Price","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well established, but opportunities for earlier diagnosis and improved management are still missed. Compared to the general COPD population, patients with a history of exacerbations and suboptimal treatment (\"modifiable high-risk\") are at greater risk of future exacerbations and adverse health outcomes. To date there is no systematic approach for identifying and treating this patient group.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two cluster randomized controlled trials (CRTs) in the United Kingdom and United States will assess the impact of a primary care-based quality improvement program (COllaboratioN on QUality improvement initiative for achieving Excellence in STandards of COPD care [CONQUEST]), compared to routine care. In each trial, 126 primary care clusters will be randomized 1:1 to intervention or control arms. Three groups of modifiable high-risk patients will be identified using electronic medical records: undiagnosed with potential COPD, newly diagnosed COPD, and already diagnosed COPD. Eligible patients will be aged ≥40 years, have experienced ≥2 moderate/≥1 severe exacerbation(s) in the prior 24 months, including ≥1 in the last 12 months, and not be prescribed inhaled triple therapy. Patients in the undiagnosed group will also be required to have a positive smoking history. Primary trial outcomes will be the annual rate of exacerbations and the annual rate of major adverse cardiac or respiratory events, comparing the quality improvement program against routine care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These will be the first CRTs assessing such a comprehensive primary care-based COPD quality improvement program. Intention-to-treat analysis of trial outcomes after 24 months will inform its effectiveness in targeting the identification, assessment, treatment, and follow-up of patients with modifiable high-risk COPD.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>UK trial: ISRCTN15819828; US trial: NCT05306743.</p>","PeriodicalId":51340,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","volume":" ","pages":"223-239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well established, but opportunities for earlier diagnosis and improved management are still missed. Compared to the general COPD population, patients with a history of exacerbations and suboptimal treatment ("modifiable high-risk") are at greater risk of future exacerbations and adverse health outcomes. To date there is no systematic approach for identifying and treating this patient group.

Method: Two cluster randomized controlled trials (CRTs) in the United Kingdom and United States will assess the impact of a primary care-based quality improvement program (COllaboratioN on QUality improvement initiative for achieving Excellence in STandards of COPD care [CONQUEST]), compared to routine care. In each trial, 126 primary care clusters will be randomized 1:1 to intervention or control arms. Three groups of modifiable high-risk patients will be identified using electronic medical records: undiagnosed with potential COPD, newly diagnosed COPD, and already diagnosed COPD. Eligible patients will be aged ≥40 years, have experienced ≥2 moderate/≥1 severe exacerbation(s) in the prior 24 months, including ≥1 in the last 12 months, and not be prescribed inhaled triple therapy. Patients in the undiagnosed group will also be required to have a positive smoking history. Primary trial outcomes will be the annual rate of exacerbations and the annual rate of major adverse cardiac or respiratory events, comparing the quality improvement program against routine care.

Discussion: These will be the first CRTs assessing such a comprehensive primary care-based COPD quality improvement program. Intention-to-treat analysis of trial outcomes after 24 months will inform its effectiveness in targeting the identification, assessment, treatment, and follow-up of patients with modifiable high-risk COPD.

Trial registration: UK trial: ISRCTN15819828; US trial: NCT05306743.

与常规治疗相比,可改变的高风险COPD患者改善方案的实用评估:集群随机占上风试验方案
背景:慢性阻塞性肺病的负担是众所周知的,但仍然错过了早期诊断和改善管理的机会。与一般慢性阻塞性肺病人群相比,有加重病史和次优治疗(“可改变的高风险”)的患者未来加重和不良健康结果的风险更大。到目前为止,还没有系统的方法来识别和治疗这一患者群体。方法:英国和美国的两组随机对照试验(crt)将评估基于初级保健的质量改善计划(CONQUEST)与常规护理相比的影响。在每项试验中,126个初级保健组将按1:1的比例随机分配到干预组或对照组。将使用电子病历确定三组可修改的高危患者:未诊断为潜在COPD、新诊断为COPD和已诊断为COPD。符合条件的患者年龄≥40岁,在过去24个月内经历≥2次中度/≥1次重度恶化,包括在过去12个月内≥1次,未开吸入三联治疗。未确诊组的患者也需要有积极的吸烟史。主要试验结果将是恶化的年发生率和主要心脏和呼吸不良事件的年发生率,并将质量改善方案与常规护理进行比较。讨论:这些将是第一个评估这样一个全面的基于初级保健的COPD质量改善计划的crt。对试验结果进行24个月后的治疗意向分析,将告知其在可改变高危COPD患者的识别、评估、治疗和随访方面的有效性。试验注册:英国试验:ISRCTN15819828;美国试验号:NCT05306743。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信