Trauma systems: a global comparison.

Theodore Miclau, Zsolt J Balogh, Katherine R Miclau, Brian Bernstein, Kodi Edson Kojima, Taketo Kurozumi, Ross K Leighton, Douglas W Lundy, Guy Putzeys, Inger B Schipper, Wim Vandesande, Marcos de Camargo Leonhardt, Maria Adelaide Miranda Goncalves, Guilherme Pelosini Gaiarsa, Hans-Christoph Pape
{"title":"Trauma systems: a global comparison.","authors":"Theodore Miclau, Zsolt J Balogh, Katherine R Miclau, Brian Bernstein, Kodi Edson Kojima, Taketo Kurozumi, Ross K Leighton, Douglas W Lundy, Guy Putzeys, Inger B Schipper, Wim Vandesande, Marcos de Camargo Leonhardt, Maria Adelaide Miranda Goncalves, Guilherme Pelosini Gaiarsa, Hans-Christoph Pape","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traumatic injuries are a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, with 40 million people permanently injured and nearly 6 million deaths every year. Approximately 90% of trauma-related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries, and 50% of trauma-related deaths are believed to be preventable. Although effective trauma systems encompassing prehospital, hospital, and rehabilitative care are critical for improving outcomes, global documentation remains limited. This study provides a comparative analysis of trauma care systems across 8 countries-the United States, Canada, Brazil, Belgium, the Netherlands, Australia, Japan, and South Africa-spanning 5 continents. Each country's analysis includes demographic context, system organization (including prehospital, hospital, and posthospital care), clinical and systemic outcomes, and future directions. Trauma systems across countries vary significantly in the structure and regulation of trauma care, injury patterns, national data collection, and accessibility, reflecting diverse demographics and healthcare infrastructures. National trauma registries are well established in countries like the Netherlands, Japan, and Canada but are in early development stages in Brazil, South Africa, and Belgium. In some countries, such as the Netherlands and Canada, trauma from traffic collisions and falls dominates, whereas others, such as Brazil and South Africa, have higher rates of violence-related injuries like homicides. Accessibility in remote areas remains a challenge in countries with large landmasses such as Canada and Australia, where rural populations often face limited or delayed trauma care. Other countries, such as the United States and South Africa, face different challenges linked to disparities in quality of and access to care between public and private systems. Although centralization of trauma care, standardization of national trauma care systems, and investment in workforce and infrastructure are universal goals for improving outcomes, solutions tailored to each country are required to optimize trauma systems globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"8 3 Suppl","pages":"e376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traumatic injuries are a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, with 40 million people permanently injured and nearly 6 million deaths every year. Approximately 90% of trauma-related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries, and 50% of trauma-related deaths are believed to be preventable. Although effective trauma systems encompassing prehospital, hospital, and rehabilitative care are critical for improving outcomes, global documentation remains limited. This study provides a comparative analysis of trauma care systems across 8 countries-the United States, Canada, Brazil, Belgium, the Netherlands, Australia, Japan, and South Africa-spanning 5 continents. Each country's analysis includes demographic context, system organization (including prehospital, hospital, and posthospital care), clinical and systemic outcomes, and future directions. Trauma systems across countries vary significantly in the structure and regulation of trauma care, injury patterns, national data collection, and accessibility, reflecting diverse demographics and healthcare infrastructures. National trauma registries are well established in countries like the Netherlands, Japan, and Canada but are in early development stages in Brazil, South Africa, and Belgium. In some countries, such as the Netherlands and Canada, trauma from traffic collisions and falls dominates, whereas others, such as Brazil and South Africa, have higher rates of violence-related injuries like homicides. Accessibility in remote areas remains a challenge in countries with large landmasses such as Canada and Australia, where rural populations often face limited or delayed trauma care. Other countries, such as the United States and South Africa, face different challenges linked to disparities in quality of and access to care between public and private systems. Although centralization of trauma care, standardization of national trauma care systems, and investment in workforce and infrastructure are universal goals for improving outcomes, solutions tailored to each country are required to optimize trauma systems globally.

创伤系统:全球比较。
创伤性伤害是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因,每年有4 000万人永久性受伤,近600万人死亡。大约90%的创伤相关死亡发生在低收入和中等收入国家,50%的创伤相关死亡据信是可以预防的。尽管包括院前、医院和康复护理在内的有效创伤系统对改善预后至关重要,但全球文献仍然有限。本研究对横跨五大洲的8个国家(美国、加拿大、巴西、比利时、荷兰、澳大利亚、日本和南非)的创伤护理系统进行了比较分析。每个国家的分析包括人口背景、系统组织(包括院前、医院和院后护理)、临床和系统结果以及未来方向。各国的创伤系统在创伤护理的结构和监管、损伤模式、国家数据收集和可及性方面存在显著差异,反映了不同的人口统计和卫生保健基础设施。荷兰、日本和加拿大等国已经建立了国家创伤登记处,但巴西、南非和比利时还处于早期发展阶段。在一些国家,如荷兰和加拿大,交通碰撞和跌倒造成的创伤占主导地位,而在其他国家,如巴西和南非,与暴力有关的伤害(如杀人)的比例更高。在加拿大和澳大利亚等幅员辽阔的国家,偏远地区的可及性仍然是一个挑战,这些国家的农村人口往往面临有限或延迟的创伤护理。其他国家,如美国和南非,面临着不同的挑战,这些挑战与公共和私营系统之间在保健质量和可及性方面的差距有关。虽然创伤护理的集中化、国家创伤护理系统的标准化以及对劳动力和基础设施的投资是改善结果的普遍目标,但要在全球范围内优化创伤系统,需要为每个国家量身定制解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信