Assessing patient confidence in telehealth: Comparing across 17 medical specialties.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-04-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076251330486
Abdulrahman M Jabour
{"title":"Assessing patient confidence in telehealth: Comparing across 17 medical specialties.","authors":"Abdulrahman M Jabour","doi":"10.1177/20552076251330486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telehealth has become an increasingly vital component of healthcare delivery, particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic. As telemedicine expands its reach, understanding patient confidence in using telehealth services across different medical specialties is crucial for its continued adoption.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to address this need by exploring patient confidence in telemedicine for various health conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online self-administered survey. We collected data from 390 respondents, examining demographic information, patient confidence levels, and factors influencing their confidence. The survey included 27 questions and focused on health conditions where telehealth is most applicable, such as chronic disease management, mental health services, and preventive care. Participants rated their confidence in using telehealth for various conditions on a 5-point Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall confidence score averaged 3.3 (SD = 0.713), indicating moderate confidence among participants. The Friedman test revealed significant variability in patients' reported confidence levels regarding the use of telehealth across different medical specialties. General consultations were rated the highest (mean rank = 11.97), while emergency scenarios received the lowest confidence ratings (mean rank = 6.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that patient confidence in telehealth varies significantly across different medical scenarios, emphasizing the need for tailored telehealth strategies to address specific patient concerns and improve confidence in its use. Developing specialty-specific guidelines and policies can further support the effective integration and adoption of telehealth in the delivery of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":"11 ","pages":"20552076251330486"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12034949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251330486","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telehealth has become an increasingly vital component of healthcare delivery, particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic. As telemedicine expands its reach, understanding patient confidence in using telehealth services across different medical specialties is crucial for its continued adoption.

Objective: This study aims to address this need by exploring patient confidence in telemedicine for various health conditions.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online self-administered survey. We collected data from 390 respondents, examining demographic information, patient confidence levels, and factors influencing their confidence. The survey included 27 questions and focused on health conditions where telehealth is most applicable, such as chronic disease management, mental health services, and preventive care. Participants rated their confidence in using telehealth for various conditions on a 5-point Likert scale.

Results: The overall confidence score averaged 3.3 (SD = 0.713), indicating moderate confidence among participants. The Friedman test revealed significant variability in patients' reported confidence levels regarding the use of telehealth across different medical specialties. General consultations were rated the highest (mean rank = 11.97), while emergency scenarios received the lowest confidence ratings (mean rank = 6.19).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that patient confidence in telehealth varies significantly across different medical scenarios, emphasizing the need for tailored telehealth strategies to address specific patient concerns and improve confidence in its use. Developing specialty-specific guidelines and policies can further support the effective integration and adoption of telehealth in the delivery of care.

评估患者对远程医疗的信心:比较17个医疗专业。
背景:远程医疗已成为医疗服务日益重要的组成部分,特别是在2019冠状病毒病大流行之后。随着远程医疗覆盖面的扩大,了解患者对跨不同医疗专业使用远程医疗服务的信心对于继续采用远程医疗服务至关重要。目的:本研究旨在通过探讨不同健康状况下患者对远程医疗的信心来解决这一需求。方法:采用在线自我调查进行横断面研究。我们收集了390名受访者的数据,检查了人口统计信息、患者信心水平和影响他们信心的因素。调查包括27个问题,重点是远程保健最适用的健康状况,如慢性病管理、精神卫生服务和预防保健。参与者对各种情况下使用远程医疗的信心进行了5分李克特评分。结果:总体信心得分平均为3.3 (SD = 0.713),表明参与者信心中等。弗里德曼测试揭示了患者报告的关于不同医学专业使用远程医疗的信心水平的显著差异。一般咨询的信任度最高(平均等级为11.97),而紧急情况的信任度最低(平均等级为6.19)。结论:这些研究结果表明,患者对远程医疗的信心在不同的医疗情况下差异很大,强调需要制定量身定制的远程医疗战略,以解决患者的具体关切,并提高对远程医疗使用的信心。制定针对特定专业的指导方针和政策,可进一步支持将远程保健有效地纳入和采用护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信