Evaluation the findings of WHO rapid assistive technology assessment (rATA) in Iraq: A field-based survey.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Ali Azeez Al-Jumaili, Magdy Eissa, Wei Zhang, Alaa Hussein Ali Alameri, Aamr Bebany, Hala Sakr, Ayoob Azeez, Mohammed Khalil Mustafa, Raoof Tariq Raoof, Abdulnaser Kamil Ibrahim, Zinah E Nooruldeen, Naseem Jaafar Sadeq, Kinan Hussien Ali, Mohamad Wehbi, Houda Langar
{"title":"Evaluation the findings of WHO rapid assistive technology assessment (rATA) in Iraq: A field-based survey.","authors":"Ali Azeez Al-Jumaili, Magdy Eissa, Wei Zhang, Alaa Hussein Ali Alameri, Aamr Bebany, Hala Sakr, Ayoob Azeez, Mohammed Khalil Mustafa, Raoof Tariq Raoof, Abdulnaser Kamil Ibrahim, Zinah E Nooruldeen, Naseem Jaafar Sadeq, Kinan Hussien Ali, Mohamad Wehbi, Houda Langar","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2025.2496481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this population-based study was to assess the use, sources, payers, barriers, need, and unmet need of assistive products (AP) in the population of Iraq using the Rapid Assistive Technology Assessment (rATA) survey. The survey included a representative national sample from six governorates, including 36 cities/districts that cover all the country. In total 12,021 respondents' data were included in the data analysis. A total, of 16.4% of the sample reported use of AP, and 22.8% reported being in need of AP. Children and adolescents (≤17 years), seniors (≥80 years), and people living in rural areas had lower access to APs. The main sources of funding were out-of-pocket (57.6%), followed by friends and family (31.2%), government (10.1%), and NGOs (4.8%). Furthermore, 58%, 27.3% and 12.2% APs were obtained from the private sector, friends and family, and the government, respectively. The main barriers facing people in need to get APs were inability to afford (43.6%), no support (22.3%), unavailability of APs (11.5%), stigma (4.6%), and no time available (3.5%). It is the government's responsibility to provide AP, in addition to suitable environments (sidewalks, transportation, and public buildings) that are friendly to people with wheelchairs and crutches.</p>","PeriodicalId":51568,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2025.2496481","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this population-based study was to assess the use, sources, payers, barriers, need, and unmet need of assistive products (AP) in the population of Iraq using the Rapid Assistive Technology Assessment (rATA) survey. The survey included a representative national sample from six governorates, including 36 cities/districts that cover all the country. In total 12,021 respondents' data were included in the data analysis. A total, of 16.4% of the sample reported use of AP, and 22.8% reported being in need of AP. Children and adolescents (≤17 years), seniors (≥80 years), and people living in rural areas had lower access to APs. The main sources of funding were out-of-pocket (57.6%), followed by friends and family (31.2%), government (10.1%), and NGOs (4.8%). Furthermore, 58%, 27.3% and 12.2% APs were obtained from the private sector, friends and family, and the government, respectively. The main barriers facing people in need to get APs were inability to afford (43.6%), no support (22.3%), unavailability of APs (11.5%), stigma (4.6%), and no time available (3.5%). It is the government's responsibility to provide AP, in addition to suitable environments (sidewalks, transportation, and public buildings) that are friendly to people with wheelchairs and crutches.

评价世卫组织伊拉克快速辅助技术评估(rATA)的结果:一项实地调查。
这项基于人群的研究的目的是通过快速辅助技术评估(rATA)调查来评估伊拉克人口中辅助产品(AP)的使用、来源、支付者、障碍、需求和未满足需求。该调查包括来自六个省的代表性国家样本,包括覆盖全国的36个城市/地区。共有12021名受访者的数据被纳入数据分析。总共有16.4%的样本报告使用了AP, 22.8%的样本报告需要AP。儿童和青少年(≤17岁)、老年人(≥80岁)和农村地区的人获得AP的机会较低。资金的主要来源是自费(57.6%),其次是朋友和家人(31.2%)、政府(10.1%)和非政府组织(4.8%)。此外,58%、27.3%和12.2%的ap分别来自私营部门、朋友和家人以及政府。需要获得ap的人面临的主要障碍是负担不起(43.6%),没有支持(22.3%),无法获得ap(11.5%),耻辱(4.6%)和没有时间(3.5%)。除了提供对轮椅和拐杖的人友好的合适环境(人行道、交通工具和公共建筑)外,政府还有责任提供AP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Assistive Technology
Assistive Technology REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Assistive Technology is an applied, scientific publication in the multi-disciplinary field of technology for people with disabilities. The journal"s purpose is to foster communication among individuals working in all aspects of the assistive technology arena including researchers, developers, clinicians, educators and consumers. The journal will consider papers from all assistive technology applications. Only original papers will be accepted. Technical notes describing preliminary techniques, procedures, or findings of original scientific research may also be submitted. Letters to the Editor are welcome. Books for review may be sent to authors or publisher.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信