Impact of Theoretical Comprehension on Periodontal Instrumentation Skills Development.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Se-Lim Oh, Deborah Jones, Sheryl Syme, Oksana Mishler, Hanae Saito
{"title":"Impact of Theoretical Comprehension on Periodontal Instrumentation Skills Development.","authors":"Se-Lim Oh, Deborah Jones, Sheryl Syme, Oksana Mishler, Hanae Saito","doi":"10.1002/jdd.13921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to investigate the impact of theoretical comprehension in periodontics on clinical instrumentation skills development through a longitudinal assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Classes of 2023 (n1 = 126) and 2024 (n2 = 128) were included. Both classes took the same case-based examination (CBE) in the second year and similar CBEs in the third and fourth years. The two classes undertook the same instrumentation skill tests during the second and fourth years. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA, correlation tests, and linear regression analyses (LRA) were conducted with a significance level of α = 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The class of 2024 exhibited significantly lower performances on all three CBEs (p = 0.0002) than the class of 2023. Nonetheless, instrumentation skills development between the two classes did not differ based on the scores in the skill tests (p = 0.53), with identical clinical experience reflected as clinic points. A positive correlation between the clinic points and the fourth-year scaling competency examination scores and no correlation between the clinic points and the fourth-year CBE scores were observed. There were no correlations between the fourth-year CBE and fourth-year scaling competency examination scores based on R<sup>2</sup> values of 0.01 for the class of 2023 and 0.06 for the class of 2024 derived from LRA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The outcomes of the didactic assessments were not predictive of performance in periodontal instrumentation. The lack of correlation between didactic and skill test scores suggests that cognitive understanding and manual skills are distinct domains, each requiring targeted instructional strategies and assessment methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":50216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Education","volume":" ","pages":"e13921"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13921","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to investigate the impact of theoretical comprehension in periodontics on clinical instrumentation skills development through a longitudinal assessment.

Methods: Classes of 2023 (n1 = 126) and 2024 (n2 = 128) were included. Both classes took the same case-based examination (CBE) in the second year and similar CBEs in the third and fourth years. The two classes undertook the same instrumentation skill tests during the second and fourth years. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA, correlation tests, and linear regression analyses (LRA) were conducted with a significance level of α = 0.05.

Results: The class of 2024 exhibited significantly lower performances on all three CBEs (p = 0.0002) than the class of 2023. Nonetheless, instrumentation skills development between the two classes did not differ based on the scores in the skill tests (p = 0.53), with identical clinical experience reflected as clinic points. A positive correlation between the clinic points and the fourth-year scaling competency examination scores and no correlation between the clinic points and the fourth-year CBE scores were observed. There were no correlations between the fourth-year CBE and fourth-year scaling competency examination scores based on R2 values of 0.01 for the class of 2023 and 0.06 for the class of 2024 derived from LRA.

Conclusion: The outcomes of the didactic assessments were not predictive of performance in periodontal instrumentation. The lack of correlation between didactic and skill test scores suggests that cognitive understanding and manual skills are distinct domains, each requiring targeted instructional strategies and assessment methods.

理论理解对牙周仪器技术发展的影响。
目的:本研究旨在通过纵向评估,探讨牙周病理论理解对临床器械技能发展的影响。方法:纳入2023类(n1 = 126)和2024类(n2 = 128)。两个班在第二年参加了相同的案例考试(CBE),在第三年和第四年参加了类似的CBE。这两个班在第二年和第四年进行了同样的仪器技能测试。采用双向重复测量方差分析、相关检验和线性回归分析(LRA),显著性水平为α = 0.05。结果:与2023班相比,2024班在三个CBEs上的表现明显较低(p = 0.0002)。尽管如此,两个班级之间的仪器技能发展并没有基于技能测试分数的差异(p = 0.53),相同的临床经验反映为临床积分。临床得分与四年级量表能力考试得分呈正相关,与四年级CBE得分无相关。基于LRA得出的R2值(2023级为0.01,2024级为0.06),四年级CBE与四年级量表能力考试成绩之间不存在相关性。结论:教学评估的结果不能预测牙周器械治疗的效果。教学和技能测试成绩之间缺乏相关性表明,认知理解和手工技能是不同的领域,每个领域都需要有针对性的教学策略和评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dental Education
Journal of Dental Education 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Education (JDE) is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes a wide variety of educational and scientific research in dental, allied dental and advanced dental education. Published continuously by the American Dental Education Association since 1936 and internationally recognized as the premier journal for academic dentistry, the JDE publishes articles on such topics as curriculum reform, education research methods, innovative educational and assessment methodologies, faculty development, community-based dental education, student recruitment and admissions, professional and educational ethics, dental education around the world and systematic reviews of educational interest. The JDE is one of the top scholarly journals publishing the most important work in oral health education today; it celebrated its 80th anniversary in 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信