Is YouTube™ a useful resource of information about bichectomy? A cross-sectional study.

IF 0.5 4区医学 Q4 SURGERY

Annales De Chirurgie Plastique Esthetique Pub Date : 2025-05-07 DOI:10.1016/j.anplas.2025.03.006

H Ɪ Durmuş, B Ege, S Bayazıt, M Koparal

{"title":"Is YouTube™ a useful resource of information about bichectomy? A cross-sectional study.","authors":"H Ɪ Durmuş, B Ege, S Bayazıt, M Koparal","doi":"10.1016/j.anplas.2025.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the content and quality value of bichectomy-related YouTube™ videos.Material and methods: Four keywords (bichectomy, buccal fat removal, buccal lipectomy, Bichat's fat pad) related to bichectomy were searched on YouTube™. The top 100 videos were analyzed according to the number of views, taking into account video exclusion criteria for each keyword. The top 100 videos with the most views out of the 400 total videos included were used in our study. Video source, runtime, viewers, likes, dislikes, reliability, popularity, visibility, and usefulness were recorded and analyzed for each video. Among these videos, the top 10 videos with the best values according to all these criteria were also evaluated.Results: Of the 100 videos included, 60 were from health professionals, 21 from health sites, 14 from individual sources, and the remaining 5 from other sources. In the statistical analysis, based on their sources, reliability values were the only factor among videos that significantly differed (P<0.05). Nonetheless, no significant difference was determined in the values of views, likes, quality, and usefulness (P>0.05).Conclusion: After bichectomy-related content and video quality analysis, YouTube™ videos did not meet the criteria for being an adequate and trustworthy source of information for patients. Particularly the videos that are uploaded by health professionals and organizations ought to be of better quality with a higher level of information content.","PeriodicalId":55512,"journal":{"name":"Annales De Chirurgie Plastique Esthetique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales De Chirurgie Plastique Esthetique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2025.03.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the content and quality value of bichectomy-related YouTube™ videos.

Material and methods: Four keywords (bichectomy, buccal fat removal, buccal lipectomy, Bichat's fat pad) related to bichectomy were searched on YouTube™. The top 100 videos were analyzed according to the number of views, taking into account video exclusion criteria for each keyword. The top 100 videos with the most views out of the 400 total videos included were used in our study. Video source, runtime, viewers, likes, dislikes, reliability, popularity, visibility, and usefulness were recorded and analyzed for each video. Among these videos, the top 10 videos with the best values according to all these criteria were also evaluated.

Results: Of the 100 videos included, 60 were from health professionals, 21 from health sites, 14 from individual sources, and the remaining 5 from other sources. In the statistical analysis, based on their sources, reliability values were the only factor among videos that significantly differed (P<0.05). Nonetheless, no significant difference was determined in the values of views, likes, quality, and usefulness (P>0.05).

Conclusion: After bichectomy-related content and video quality analysis, YouTube™ videos did not meet the criteria for being an adequate and trustworthy source of information for patients. Particularly the videos that are uploaded by health professionals and organizations ought to be of better quality with a higher level of information content.

查看原文本刊更多论文

YouTube™是关于双侧切除的有用信息资源吗？横断面研究。

目的：本研究旨在评估与双肺切除术相关的YouTube™视频的内容和质量价值。材料和方法：在YouTube™上搜索与双颊切除术相关的四个关键词（双颊切除术、颊脂切除术、颊脂切除术、Bichat's脂肪垫）。根据观看次数分析前100个视频，并考虑每个关键词的视频排除标准。在总共400个视频中，点击率最高的前100个视频被用于我们的研究。对每个视频记录并分析视频来源、运行时间、观看者、喜欢、不喜欢、可靠性、受欢迎程度、可见性和有用性。在这些视频中，根据所有这些标准评选出价值最高的前10个视频。结果：在纳入的100个视频中，60个来自卫生专业人员，21个来自卫生站点，14个来自个人来源，其余5个来自其他来源。在统计分析中，根据他们的来源，可靠性值是视频中唯一有显著差异的因素（P0.05）。结论：在对双肾切除术相关内容和视频质量进行分析后，YouTube™视频不符合作为患者充分和值得信赖的信息来源的标准。特别是由卫生专业人员和组织上传的视频应该具有更高的质量和更高的信息内容水平。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Annales De Chirurgie Plastique Esthetique 医学-外科

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

44 days

期刊介绍： Qu''elle soit réparatrice après un traumatisme, pratiquée à la suite d''une malformation ou motivée par la gêne psychologique dans la vie du patient, la chirurgie plastique et esthétique touche toutes les parties du corps humain et concerne une large communauté de chirurgiens spécialisés. Organe de la Société française de chirurgie plastique reconstructrice et esthétique, la revue publie 6 fois par an des éditoriaux, des mémoires originaux, des notes techniques, des faits cliniques, des actualités chirurgicales, des revues générales, des notes brèves, des lettres à la rédaction. Sont également présentés des analyses d''articles et d''ouvrages, des comptes rendus de colloques, des informations professionnelles et un agenda des manifestations de la spécialité.