Adaptation and validation of a tool for assessing food knowledge based on the Nova classification for the Brazilian context.

IF 2.5 Q1 Multidisciplinary
Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude Pub Date : 2025-05-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/S2237-96222024v34e20240335.en
Kamila Tiemann Gabe, Gilberto Bassetto Junior, Patricia Constante Jaime
{"title":"Adaptation and validation of a tool for assessing food knowledge based on the Nova classification for the Brazilian context.","authors":"Kamila Tiemann Gabe, Gilberto Bassetto Junior, Patricia Constante Jaime","doi":"10.1590/S2237-96222024v34e20240335.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To adapt and validate a tool to measure the level of food knowledge based on the Nova classification for the Brazilian context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A tool developed by Canadian researchers was adapted for Brazil. In this tool, respondents assign healthiness scores to 12 images of foods with different levels of industrial processing according to the Nova classification - unprocessed and minimally processed, processed and ultra-processed. Total score is computed by comparing scores assigned to foods from different groups, and range from 0 to 8. The Brazilian version, named Nova-Conhecimento, was evaluated by experts and submitted to pre-tests with potential users. Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing scores of undergraduate students of nutrition and undergraduate students in education-related fields. Convergent validity was assessed by testing the association between the knowledge score and the consumption of ultra-processed foods in a subsample of the NutriNet Brazil cohort (n=1,245).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nutrition students had higher scores than education students (6.7 vs. 5.3; p-value<0.001). Each point in the knowledge score was associated with a reduction of 1.03 percentage points in the contribution of ultra-processed foods to the diet (p-value<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Nova-Conhecimento tool demonstrated validity and can contribute to food and nutritional surveillance activities based on the the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population.</p>","PeriodicalId":51473,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude","volume":"34 ","pages":"e20240335"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12052328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S2237-96222024v34e20240335.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To adapt and validate a tool to measure the level of food knowledge based on the Nova classification for the Brazilian context.

Methods: A tool developed by Canadian researchers was adapted for Brazil. In this tool, respondents assign healthiness scores to 12 images of foods with different levels of industrial processing according to the Nova classification - unprocessed and minimally processed, processed and ultra-processed. Total score is computed by comparing scores assigned to foods from different groups, and range from 0 to 8. The Brazilian version, named Nova-Conhecimento, was evaluated by experts and submitted to pre-tests with potential users. Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing scores of undergraduate students of nutrition and undergraduate students in education-related fields. Convergent validity was assessed by testing the association between the knowledge score and the consumption of ultra-processed foods in a subsample of the NutriNet Brazil cohort (n=1,245).

Results: Nutrition students had higher scores than education students (6.7 vs. 5.3; p-value<0.001). Each point in the knowledge score was associated with a reduction of 1.03 percentage points in the contribution of ultra-processed foods to the diet (p-value<0.001).

Conclusion: The Nova-Conhecimento tool demonstrated validity and can contribute to food and nutritional surveillance activities based on the the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population.

巴西背景下基于Nova分类的食物知识评估工具的适应和验证。
目的:适应和验证一种工具,以巴西背景下的Nova分类为基础,衡量食品知识水平。方法:加拿大研究人员开发的一种工具适用于巴西。在这个工具中,受访者根据Nova分类——未加工和最低限度加工、加工和超加工——为12张不同工业加工水平的食品图像分配健康分数。总分是通过比较不同组食物的得分来计算的,范围从0到8。巴西版本名为Nova-Conhecimento,经过专家评估,并提交给潜在用户进行预测试。通过比较营养专业本科生和教育相关专业本科生的得分来评估区分效度。通过在NutriNet巴西队列的子样本(n=1,245)中测试知识得分与超加工食品消费之间的关联来评估收敛效度。结果:营养专业学生得分高于教育专业学生(6.7比5.3;结论:Nova-Conhecimento工具具有一定的有效性,可用于依据《巴西人口膳食指南》开展食品和营养监测活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude
Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信