Safety and tolerability of intravenous liposomal GM1 in patients with Parkinson disease: A single-center open-label clinical phase I trial (NEON trial).

IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
PLoS Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-13 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004472
Stefan Halbherr, Stefanie Lerch, Sebastian Bellwald, Petra Polakova, Bettina Bannert, Marie Roumet, Roch-Philippe Charles, Martin A Walter, Corrado Bernasconi, Valérie Lisa Halbherr, Camille Peitsch, Pascal C Baumgartner, Céline Kaufmann, Vanessa Aires, Heinrich P Mattle, Alain Kaelin-Lang, Andreas Hartmann, Michael Schuepbach
{"title":"Safety and tolerability of intravenous liposomal GM1 in patients with Parkinson disease: A single-center open-label clinical phase I trial (NEON trial).","authors":"Stefan Halbherr, Stefanie Lerch, Sebastian Bellwald, Petra Polakova, Bettina Bannert, Marie Roumet, Roch-Philippe Charles, Martin A Walter, Corrado Bernasconi, Valérie Lisa Halbherr, Camille Peitsch, Pascal C Baumgartner, Céline Kaufmann, Vanessa Aires, Heinrich P Mattle, Alain Kaelin-Lang, Andreas Hartmann, Michael Schuepbach","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parkinson disease (PD) is a chronic progressive neurodegenerative disorder leading to motor and non-motor impairment, often resulting in severe loss of quality of life. There are symptomatic treatments without effect on the progression of PD. A disease-modifying treatment that could ideally stop the neurodegenerative process is direly needed. Monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (GM1) is a promising molecule with neuroprotective effects in preclinical models of PD and has yielded encouraging results in patients with PD in a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Talineuren (TLN) is a liposomal formulation of GM1 that has been shown to cross the blood-brain barrier in animals. We assessed the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of TLN in patients with PD.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>We prospectively enrolled 12 patients with PD into a single-center, open-label phase I trial to assess the safety and tolerability of weekly infusions with TLN. The maximum suitable dose of TLN was determined by dose escalation in three patients. All three patients tolerated the predetermined maximal dose of 720 mg. Subsequently, these and nine additional patients received weekly infusions at the maximum suitable dose of 720 mg TLN over two months (1 patient stopped prematurely). PK were determined for the additional nine patients as a secondary outcome measure. Cmax was reached 4 h after infusion start for all but one participant, who reached Cmax after 1 h, while the median plasma half-life was reached at 12.6 h. All adverse events were continuously assessed as the primary objective and coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Clinical manifestations of PD were assessed as secondary outcomes using the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), including a levodopa challenge test at baseline and end. In addition to weekly history taking, scales to measure mood, behavior, quality of life, sleepiness, non-motor symptoms of PD, and cognition were used as further secondary outcomes as well as assessing the Levodopa-Equivalent Daily Dose (LEDD). Overall, 304 adverse events (mean: 25.33; 6-75 events per patient) occurred, 267 of which were mild (mean: 22.25; 3-72 events per patient). 23 were considered related to the study treatment (0-8 events per patient). Very mild-to-severe acute infusion reactions at the second, third, or fourth administration of TLN within the first minutes of the infusion occurred in seven patients. All reported back or neck pain. Other acute infusion reactions were urticaria, plethora, nausea, and chest pain. These adverse reactions disappeared within minutes of stopping the infusion and did not recur when TLN administration was resumed at a very low rate. Beyond the fourth administration, infusions could be given at increased rates up to 370 ml/h, and no acute reaction occurred anymore. The mechanism of this acute infusion reaction remains unclear. Some patients reported mild dizziness for a few hours after TLN following many but not all administrations throughout the study. Non-motor symptoms of PD, motor parkinsonian signs off medication, and quality of life improved significantly during the treatment phase, including the MDS-UPDRS total score (mean decrease -11.09; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]; -18, -4.1; p = 0.006), the Parkinson's disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) summary index (mean decrease -2.91; 95% CI; -4.4, -1.4; p = 0.005), and the Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire (NMS-Quest) (mean decrease -4.27; 95% CI; -6.5, -2.1; p = 0.009). No statistically significant improvements were seen in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (mean decrease -0.73; 95% CI; -2.1, 0.62; p = 0.255), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (mean increase 0.09; 95% CI; -2.6, 2.8; p > 0.999), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (mean decrease -1.27; 95% CI; -3.8, 1.3; p = 0.257), and the Starkstein Apathy Scale (mean increase 0.36; 95% CI; -1.6, 2.4; p = 0.822). Dopaminergic medications remained stable during the study (LEDD mean increase 8.18; 95% CI; -7.7, 24; p = 0.423). While clinical improvements indicate a benefit associated with TLN treatment, the trial design does not allow for definite conclusions regarding efficacy. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial will be required to corroborate our exploratory findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TLN is safe and well-tolerated in general. This prospective phase I trial revealed non-allergic habituating acute infusion reactions at the second, third, or fourth treatment that can be prevented by a slower rate of infusion. Importantly, the exploratory results suggest a consistent improvement of signs and symptoms of PD.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The NEON trial is registered at the US National Institutes of Health (ClinicalTrials.gov) #NCT04976127 and in the Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal (SNCTP000004631).</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":"22 5","pages":"e1004472"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004472","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Parkinson disease (PD) is a chronic progressive neurodegenerative disorder leading to motor and non-motor impairment, often resulting in severe loss of quality of life. There are symptomatic treatments without effect on the progression of PD. A disease-modifying treatment that could ideally stop the neurodegenerative process is direly needed. Monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (GM1) is a promising molecule with neuroprotective effects in preclinical models of PD and has yielded encouraging results in patients with PD in a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Talineuren (TLN) is a liposomal formulation of GM1 that has been shown to cross the blood-brain barrier in animals. We assessed the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of TLN in patients with PD.

Methods and findings: We prospectively enrolled 12 patients with PD into a single-center, open-label phase I trial to assess the safety and tolerability of weekly infusions with TLN. The maximum suitable dose of TLN was determined by dose escalation in three patients. All three patients tolerated the predetermined maximal dose of 720 mg. Subsequently, these and nine additional patients received weekly infusions at the maximum suitable dose of 720 mg TLN over two months (1 patient stopped prematurely). PK were determined for the additional nine patients as a secondary outcome measure. Cmax was reached 4 h after infusion start for all but one participant, who reached Cmax after 1 h, while the median plasma half-life was reached at 12.6 h. All adverse events were continuously assessed as the primary objective and coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Clinical manifestations of PD were assessed as secondary outcomes using the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), including a levodopa challenge test at baseline and end. In addition to weekly history taking, scales to measure mood, behavior, quality of life, sleepiness, non-motor symptoms of PD, and cognition were used as further secondary outcomes as well as assessing the Levodopa-Equivalent Daily Dose (LEDD). Overall, 304 adverse events (mean: 25.33; 6-75 events per patient) occurred, 267 of which were mild (mean: 22.25; 3-72 events per patient). 23 were considered related to the study treatment (0-8 events per patient). Very mild-to-severe acute infusion reactions at the second, third, or fourth administration of TLN within the first minutes of the infusion occurred in seven patients. All reported back or neck pain. Other acute infusion reactions were urticaria, plethora, nausea, and chest pain. These adverse reactions disappeared within minutes of stopping the infusion and did not recur when TLN administration was resumed at a very low rate. Beyond the fourth administration, infusions could be given at increased rates up to 370 ml/h, and no acute reaction occurred anymore. The mechanism of this acute infusion reaction remains unclear. Some patients reported mild dizziness for a few hours after TLN following many but not all administrations throughout the study. Non-motor symptoms of PD, motor parkinsonian signs off medication, and quality of life improved significantly during the treatment phase, including the MDS-UPDRS total score (mean decrease -11.09; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]; -18, -4.1; p = 0.006), the Parkinson's disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) summary index (mean decrease -2.91; 95% CI; -4.4, -1.4; p = 0.005), and the Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire (NMS-Quest) (mean decrease -4.27; 95% CI; -6.5, -2.1; p = 0.009). No statistically significant improvements were seen in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (mean decrease -0.73; 95% CI; -2.1, 0.62; p = 0.255), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (mean increase 0.09; 95% CI; -2.6, 2.8; p > 0.999), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (mean decrease -1.27; 95% CI; -3.8, 1.3; p = 0.257), and the Starkstein Apathy Scale (mean increase 0.36; 95% CI; -1.6, 2.4; p = 0.822). Dopaminergic medications remained stable during the study (LEDD mean increase 8.18; 95% CI; -7.7, 24; p = 0.423). While clinical improvements indicate a benefit associated with TLN treatment, the trial design does not allow for definite conclusions regarding efficacy. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial will be required to corroborate our exploratory findings.

Conclusion: TLN is safe and well-tolerated in general. This prospective phase I trial revealed non-allergic habituating acute infusion reactions at the second, third, or fourth treatment that can be prevented by a slower rate of infusion. Importantly, the exploratory results suggest a consistent improvement of signs and symptoms of PD.

Trial registration: The NEON trial is registered at the US National Institutes of Health (ClinicalTrials.gov) #NCT04976127 and in the Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal (SNCTP000004631).

帕金森病患者静脉注射GM1脂质体的安全性和耐受性:一项单中心开放标签临床I期试验(NEON试验)
背景:帕金森病(PD)是一种慢性进行性神经退行性疾病,导致运动和非运动障碍,常导致严重的生活质量损失。有对症治疗对PD的进展没有影响。目前迫切需要一种能够理想地阻止神经退行性疾病的治疗方法。单唾液酸四己糖神经节苷脂(GM1)是一种在PD临床前模型中具有神经保护作用的有希望的分子,在一项随机安慰剂对照试验中,它在PD患者中取得了令人鼓舞的结果。Talineuren (TLN)是一种GM1的脂质体制剂,已被证明可以穿过动物血脑屏障。我们评估了TLN在PD患者中的安全性和药代动力学(PK)。方法和研究结果:我们前瞻性地招募了12名PD患者进行单中心、开放标签的I期试验,以评估每周输注TLN的安全性和耐受性。三例患者采用剂量递增法确定了TLN的最大适宜剂量。所有三名患者耐受预定的最大剂量720毫克。随后,这些患者和另外9名患者在两个月内每周以最大合适剂量720 mg TLN输注(1名患者过早停药)。另外9例患者的PK作为次要结果测量。除一名参与者外,所有参与者在开始输注后4小时达到Cmax, 1小时后达到Cmax,而中位血浆半衰期为12.6小时。将所有不良事件作为主要目标进行持续评估,并根据监管活动医学词典(MedDRA)进行编码。使用运动障碍学会统一帕金森病评定量表(MDS-UPDRS)评估PD的临床表现作为次要结局,包括基线和终点的左旋多巴激发试验。除了每周记录病史外,还使用测量情绪、行为、生活质量、嗜睡、PD的非运动症状和认知的量表作为进一步的次要结局,以及评估左旋多巴当量日剂量(LEDD)。总的来说,304个不良事件(平均:25.33;每例患者发生6-75例事件),其中267例为轻度(平均:22.25例;每位患者发生3-72次事件)。23例被认为与研究治疗有关(每位患者0-8例事件)。7例患者在第二次、第三次或第四次给药TLN后的第一分钟内发生了非常轻至严重的急性输注反应。所有人都报告背部或颈部疼痛。其他急性输液反应包括荨麻疹、呕吐、恶心和胸痛。这些不良反应在停止输注几分钟内消失,并且在以极低的速率恢复TLN给药后没有复发。在第四次给药后,可以以增加的速度输液至370 ml/h,不再发生急性反应。这种急性输液反应的机制尚不清楚。在整个研究过程中,一些患者在多次(但不是全部)给予TLN后的几个小时内报告轻度头晕。PD的非运动症状、运动帕金森病的停药迹象和生活质量在治疗期间显著改善,包括MDS-UPDRS总分(平均下降-11.09;95%置信区间[CI];-18年,-4.1;p = 0.006),帕金森病问卷-39 (PDQ-39)汇总指数(平均下降-2.91;95%可信区间;-4.4、-1.4;p = 0.005),非运动症状问卷(NMS-Quest)(平均减少-4.27;95%可信区间;-6.5、-2.1;p = 0.009)。蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)无统计学显著改善(平均下降-0.73;95%可信区间;-2.1、0.62;p = 0.255), Epworth嗜睡量表(平均增加0.09;95%可信区间;-2.6、2.8;p > 0.999),贝克抑郁量表(BDI)(平均下降-1.27;95%可信区间;-3.8、1.3;p = 0.257),斯塔克斯坦冷漠量表(平均增加0.36;95%可信区间;-1.6、2.4;p = 0.822)。多巴胺能药物在研究期间保持稳定(LEDD平均增加8.18;95%可信区间;-7.7, 24;p = 0.423)。虽然临床改善表明与TLN治疗相关的益处,但试验设计不允许关于疗效的明确结论。需要随机、安慰剂对照试验来证实我们的探索性发现。结论:TLN总体上是安全的,耐受性良好。这项前瞻性I期试验显示,在第二次、第三次或第四次治疗时,非过敏性适应急性输注反应可以通过减慢输注速度来预防。重要的是,探索性结果表明PD的体征和症状持续改善。试验注册:NEON试验已在美国国立卫生研究院(ClinicalTrials.gov) #NCT04976127和瑞士国家临床试验门户网站(SNCTP000004631)注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Medicine
PLoS Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
0.60%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Medicine is a prominent platform for discussing and researching global health challenges. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedical, environmental, social, and political factors affecting health. It prioritizes articles that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or a better understanding of pathophysiology, ultimately aiming to improve health outcomes across different settings. The journal is unwavering in its commitment to uphold the highest ethical standards in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and disclosing any conflicts of interest related to reporting, reviewing, and publishing. PLOS Medicine promotes transparency in the entire review and publication process. The journal also encourages data sharing and encourages the reuse of published work. Additionally, authors retain copyright for their work, and the publication is made accessible through Open Access with no restrictions on availability and dissemination. PLOS Medicine takes measures to avoid conflicts of interest associated with advertising drugs and medical devices or engaging in the exclusive sale of reprints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信