Effects of Neurocognitive Multitask Activities on a Novel Lower Extremity Functional Performance Test.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Sidney M Stoddard, Logan Hill, Bryan L Riemann, George J Davies
{"title":"Effects of Neurocognitive Multitask Activities on a Novel Lower Extremity Functional Performance Test.","authors":"Sidney M Stoddard, Logan Hill, Bryan L Riemann, George J Davies","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the effects of incorporating (1) a neurocognitive reactive component and (2) a neurocognitive multitask component on performance degradation of a single-limb hop functional performance test.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized within-subject design of 32 healthy young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants performed 3 randomly assigned variations of the single-limb T-Drill Hop Test (TDHT). The time to complete each test was recorded. The reactive TDHT (R-TDHT) consisted of the TDHT with a flashing light, indicating the \"T\" intersection hop direction. The neurocognitive reactive-recall TDHT (RR-TDHT) incorporated the R-TDHT and required participants to observe 5 flashing light colors. Participants then recalled the colors in order at test completion. Each test was performed on the dominant and nondominant lower extremities in a randomly assigned order. Within-group differences in completion time between tests were calculated using a test by limb analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Test complexity prompted similar completion time changes between the limbs (P = .718, ηp2=.011). The R-TDHT (P = .001, d = .12) and RR-TDHT (P < .001, d = 0.24) completion times were significantly longer than the TDHT, and the RR-TDHT completion time was significantly longer (P < .001, d = 0.11) than the R-TDHT. The completion time differences between TDHT and R-TDHT and between R-TDHT and RR-TDHT were statistically identical (P = .770, d = 0.05). There was no statistically significant completion time difference between the dominant and nondominant limbs (P = .420, d = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The inclusion of a neurocognitive reactive activity and a multitask neurocognitive reactive-recall activity to a functional performance test significantly increased the test completion time compared with the functional performance test alone. The addition of a neurocognitive reactive component or a multitask neurocognitive reactive-recall component to the TDHT provides an effective means of improving the ecological validity of the current lower extremity functional performance test.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0433","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effects of incorporating (1) a neurocognitive reactive component and (2) a neurocognitive multitask component on performance degradation of a single-limb hop functional performance test.

Design: Randomized within-subject design of 32 healthy young adults.

Methods: Participants performed 3 randomly assigned variations of the single-limb T-Drill Hop Test (TDHT). The time to complete each test was recorded. The reactive TDHT (R-TDHT) consisted of the TDHT with a flashing light, indicating the "T" intersection hop direction. The neurocognitive reactive-recall TDHT (RR-TDHT) incorporated the R-TDHT and required participants to observe 5 flashing light colors. Participants then recalled the colors in order at test completion. Each test was performed on the dominant and nondominant lower extremities in a randomly assigned order. Within-group differences in completion time between tests were calculated using a test by limb analysis of variance.

Results: Test complexity prompted similar completion time changes between the limbs (P = .718, ηp2=.011). The R-TDHT (P = .001, d = .12) and RR-TDHT (P < .001, d = 0.24) completion times were significantly longer than the TDHT, and the RR-TDHT completion time was significantly longer (P < .001, d = 0.11) than the R-TDHT. The completion time differences between TDHT and R-TDHT and between R-TDHT and RR-TDHT were statistically identical (P = .770, d = 0.05). There was no statistically significant completion time difference between the dominant and nondominant limbs (P = .420, d = 0.06).

Conclusion: The inclusion of a neurocognitive reactive activity and a multitask neurocognitive reactive-recall activity to a functional performance test significantly increased the test completion time compared with the functional performance test alone. The addition of a neurocognitive reactive component or a multitask neurocognitive reactive-recall component to the TDHT provides an effective means of improving the ecological validity of the current lower extremity functional performance test.

神经认知多任务活动对新型下肢功能性能测试的影响。
目的:研究合并(1)神经认知反应性成分和(2)神经认知多任务成分对单肢跳跃功能测试成绩下降的影响。设计:32名健康年轻人的随机受试者设计。方法:参与者进行了3种随机分配的单肢T-Drill跳跃测试(TDHT)。记录完成每个测试的时间。反应性TDHT (R-TDHT)由闪烁的TDHT组成,指示“T”交叉口跳跃方向。神经认知反应-回忆TDHT (RR-TDHT)与R-TDHT相结合,要求参与者观察5种闪烁的光色。然后参与者在测试结束时按顺序回忆颜色。每个测试在优势和非优势下肢按随机分配的顺序进行。各组间完成时间的组内差异采用方差的肢体分析检验计算。结果:测试复杂性导致四肢完成时间变化相似(P =. 718, η P =.011)。R-TDHT (P = 0.001, d = 0.12)和R-TDHT (P < 0.001, d = 0.24)完成时间均显著长于TDHT,且R-TDHT完成时间显著长于R-TDHT (P < 0.001, d = 0.11)。TDHT与R-TDHT、R-TDHT与R-TDHT完成时间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.770, d = 0.05)。优势肢与非优势肢完成时间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.420, d = 0.06)。结论:在功能表现测试中加入神经认知反应性活动和多任务神经认知反应-回忆活动,与单独的功能表现测试相比,显著增加了测试完成时间。在TDHT中增加神经认知反应性成分或多任务神经认知反应-回忆成分是提高当前下肢功能表现测试生态效度的有效手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信