Pharmacologic agents for perioperative cardioprotection in noncardiac surgery.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Current Opinion in Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000001494
Waynice Neiva de Paula-Garcia, Stefan De Hert
{"title":"Pharmacologic agents for perioperative cardioprotection in noncardiac surgery.","authors":"Waynice Neiva de Paula-Garcia, Stefan De Hert","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the review: </strong>This review will discuss the current pharmacologic strategies for mitigation of perioperative myocardial injury. State-of-the-art benefits and harms of pharmacologic interventions to delineate knowledge gaps in current guidelines and clinical practice will be presented.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Beta-blockers are known to reduce major adverse cardiac events but inappropriate preoperative initiation results in adverse outcomes. Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosteron System (RAAS) inhibitors once universally discontinued before surgery are now under reconsideration as continuation seems not to be associated with increased risk. Statins continue to be the cornerstone due to their pleiotropic effect. Continuation of aspirin is supported perioperatively if the bleeding risk due to surgery is low to moderate. A few studies have investigated a strategy of strict intraoperative blood pressure control but failed to observe a meaningful effect on outcome. Whether prompt intensification of treatment in case of diagnosis of myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery improves outcome remains to be established. Since the MANAGE trial, no new studies have prospectively addressed this question.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>New data have questioned previous ideas and suggest a more nuanced, personalized approach to perioperative management. Accordingly, future studies should address refinement in risk stratification, optimization of pharmacologic strategies, and the development of novel therapies in attempting to enhance outcomes in high-risk surgical populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"361-368"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001494","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the review: This review will discuss the current pharmacologic strategies for mitigation of perioperative myocardial injury. State-of-the-art benefits and harms of pharmacologic interventions to delineate knowledge gaps in current guidelines and clinical practice will be presented.

Recent findings: Beta-blockers are known to reduce major adverse cardiac events but inappropriate preoperative initiation results in adverse outcomes. Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosteron System (RAAS) inhibitors once universally discontinued before surgery are now under reconsideration as continuation seems not to be associated with increased risk. Statins continue to be the cornerstone due to their pleiotropic effect. Continuation of aspirin is supported perioperatively if the bleeding risk due to surgery is low to moderate. A few studies have investigated a strategy of strict intraoperative blood pressure control but failed to observe a meaningful effect on outcome. Whether prompt intensification of treatment in case of diagnosis of myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery improves outcome remains to be established. Since the MANAGE trial, no new studies have prospectively addressed this question.

Summary: New data have questioned previous ideas and suggest a more nuanced, personalized approach to perioperative management. Accordingly, future studies should address refinement in risk stratification, optimization of pharmacologic strategies, and the development of novel therapies in attempting to enhance outcomes in high-risk surgical populations.

非心脏手术围手术期心脏保护的药理作用。
综述目的:本综述将讨论当前缓解围手术期心肌的药理学策略。将介绍当前指南和临床实践中描述知识差距的最先进的药物干预的益处和危害。最近发现:已知β受体阻滞剂可减少主要心脏不良事件,但术前不适当的起始会导致不良结果。肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)抑制剂曾经在手术前普遍停用,现在正在重新考虑,因为继续服用似乎与风险增加无关。他汀类药物由于其多效性而继续成为基础。如果手术出血风险为低至中等,则支持围手术期继续服用阿司匹林。一些研究调查了严格的术中血压控制策略,但未能观察到对结果的有意义的影响。如果诊断为非心脏手术后心肌损伤,及时加强治疗是否能改善预后仍有待确定。自MANAGE试验以来,没有新的研究前瞻性地解决了这个问题。总结:新的数据对以前的想法提出了质疑,并提出了一种更细致、更个性化的围手术期管理方法。因此,未来的研究应致力于改进风险分层,优化药物策略,并开发新的治疗方法,以提高高危手术人群的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
207
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Anesthesiology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fifteen disciplines published across the year – including cardiovascular anesthesiology, neuroanesthesia and pain medicine – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信