Age-Based Genomic Screening: Pediatric Providers' Perspectives on Implementation.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Margaret Waltz, Ann Katherine M Foreman, Rebecca A Gibson, Samantha Schilling, Laura V Milko, Rachel Phillips, Julianne M O'Daniel, Stefanija Giric, Kimberly Foss, Elizabeth K Branch, Neal A deJong, Michelle L Hernandez, Bradford C Powell, Jonathan S Berg, R Jean Cadigan, Megan C Roberts
{"title":"Age-Based Genomic Screening: Pediatric Providers' Perspectives on Implementation.","authors":"Margaret Waltz, Ann Katherine M Foreman, Rebecca A Gibson, Samantha Schilling, Laura V Milko, Rachel Phillips, Julianne M O'Daniel, Stefanija Giric, Kimberly Foss, Elizabeth K Branch, Neal A deJong, Michelle L Hernandez, Bradford C Powell, Jonathan S Berg, R Jean Cadigan, Megan C Roberts","doi":"10.1159/000545839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As genomic technologies and therapies advance, paired with increasing clinical knowledge and declining sequencing cost, the scope of DNA-based preventive pediatric screening is expected to expand. Age-Based Genomic Screening (ABGS) is an approach that proposes to integrate targeted genomic sequencing for highly actionable genetic conditions into routine well-child care at specific time points aligned with optimal interventions. Prior to the clinical implementation of ABGS in pediatric primary care, however, it is necessary to investigate the factors that may affect its adoption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted 20 interviews with providers from 11 clinics across North Carolina. Interviews lasted approximately 45 minutes, and rapid qualitative analysis was conducted using an analytic matrix.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviewees stated that, in general, implementation of ABGS would be feasible but identified several barriers, including providers' potential discomfort discussing genomic screening and returning results as well as broader concerns about the potential to exacerbate health disparities. Providers also noted potential challenges impacting interest from patients and families, such as caregiver anxiety while awaiting results, patient apprehension regarding invasive sample collection methods (like blood draws), and a general lack of trust in government and medical institutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While ABGS was viewed as feasible, the identified barriers emphasize the importance of piloting this approach, particularly in terms of potential exacerbation of health disparities. These findings are useful to guide early development and assessment of efforts like ABGS and may also be applicable to broader integration of genomic screening into primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49650,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Genomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545839","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: As genomic technologies and therapies advance, paired with increasing clinical knowledge and declining sequencing cost, the scope of DNA-based preventive pediatric screening is expected to expand. Age-Based Genomic Screening (ABGS) is an approach that proposes to integrate targeted genomic sequencing for highly actionable genetic conditions into routine well-child care at specific time points aligned with optimal interventions. Prior to the clinical implementation of ABGS in pediatric primary care, however, it is necessary to investigate the factors that may affect its adoption.

Methods: We conducted 20 interviews with providers from 11 clinics across North Carolina. Interviews lasted approximately 45 minutes, and rapid qualitative analysis was conducted using an analytic matrix.

Results: Interviewees stated that, in general, implementation of ABGS would be feasible but identified several barriers, including providers' potential discomfort discussing genomic screening and returning results as well as broader concerns about the potential to exacerbate health disparities. Providers also noted potential challenges impacting interest from patients and families, such as caregiver anxiety while awaiting results, patient apprehension regarding invasive sample collection methods (like blood draws), and a general lack of trust in government and medical institutions.

Conclusion: While ABGS was viewed as feasible, the identified barriers emphasize the importance of piloting this approach, particularly in terms of potential exacerbation of health disparities. These findings are useful to guide early development and assessment of efforts like ABGS and may also be applicable to broader integration of genomic screening into primary care.

基于年龄的基因组筛查:儿科提供者对实施的观点。
导读:随着基因组技术和治疗方法的进步,加上临床知识的增加和测序成本的下降,基于dna的儿科预防性筛查的范围有望扩大。基于年龄的基因组筛查(ABGS)是一种建议在特定时间点与最佳干预措施相一致,将针对高度可操作的遗传条件的靶向基因组测序整合到常规儿童保育中的方法。然而,在儿科初级保健中临床实施ABGS之前,有必要调查可能影响其采用的因素。方法:我们对北卡罗来纳州11家诊所的提供者进行了20次访谈。访谈持续了大约45分钟,并使用分析矩阵进行了快速定性分析。结果:受访者表示,总体而言,ABGS的实施是可行的,但指出了一些障碍,包括提供者在讨论基因组筛查和返回结果时可能感到不适,以及对可能加剧健康差距的更广泛担忧。提供者还指出了影响患者和家属兴趣的潜在挑战,例如护理人员在等待结果时的焦虑,患者对侵入性样本采集方法(如抽血)的担忧,以及对政府和医疗机构普遍缺乏信任。结论:虽然ABGS被认为是可行的,但所确定的障碍强调了试点这种方法的重要性,特别是在可能加剧健康差距方面。这些发现有助于指导ABGS等工作的早期开发和评估,也可能适用于将基因组筛查更广泛地纳入初级保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Genomics
Public Health Genomics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Public Health Genomics'' is the leading international journal focusing on the timely translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies into public health, health policies, and healthcare as a whole. This peer-reviewed journal is a bimonthly forum featuring original papers, reviews, short communications, and policy statements. It is supplemented by topic-specific issues providing a comprehensive, holistic and ''all-inclusive'' picture of the chosen subject. Multidisciplinary in scope, it combines theoretical and empirical work from a range of disciplines, notably public health, molecular and medical sciences, the humanities and social sciences. In so doing, it also takes into account rapid scientific advances from fields such as systems biology, microbiomics, epigenomics or information and communication technologies as well as the hight potential of ''big data'' for public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信