Development and Evaluation of Clinical Decision Support for Immigrant Child Health Screening in Primary Care.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-28 DOI:10.1055/a-2594-3633
Jeremy J Michel, Dean Karavite, Daniel White, Nadège Mudenge, Elizabeth Dawson-Hahn, Katherine Yun
{"title":"Development and Evaluation of Clinical Decision Support for Immigrant Child Health Screening in Primary Care.","authors":"Jeremy J Michel, Dean Karavite, Daniel White, Nadège Mudenge, Elizabeth Dawson-Hahn, Katherine Yun","doi":"10.1055/a-2594-3633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While electronic health record (EHR)-based tools for refugee health screening exist, support for other immigrant children has lagged. Reasons include lack of time, difficulty determining screening eligibility, and lack of awareness of screening recommendations. EHR-based tools to promote immigrant child health screening (ICHS) can address these challenges, but guidance is needed for tools that are usable by clinicians and acceptable to immigrant families.Develop useful EHR-based tools to support ICHS while incorporating evaluation of acceptability, usability, and implementation effort.We followed a five-step human-centered design approach to develop EHR-based tools for ICHS. This included: (1) representative users completing semi-structured interviews. (2) Health professionals and community advisory groups providing ongoing guidance. (3) Developing a functional prototype. (4) Usability testing of the prototype. And (5) an assessment of the implementation effort involving a second site installation coupled with expert implementation time estimations.Sixteen interviewees discussed screening barriers and how EHR-based tools could support discussing nativity (country of birth). From the interview findings and in consultation with advisory group members, we developed an EHR-based toolkit including noninterruptive alerts, an order set, and a documentation prompt. Ten clinicians completed usability testing. All recognized the alert and asked country of birth. Most (9) were satisfied with the system. All felt it was easy to use, helpful, and would not hinder patient care. Content experts (<i>n</i> = 8) estimated installation times (range: 4-20 hours, median 10) with high levels of confidence (range: 1-5, median 4). A second-site test installation required 7.25 hours.Our EHR-based tools designed with the guidance of experts were highly rated on usability and can help clinicians identify patients eligible for ICHS in a sensitive manner. Installation testing demonstrated that this content could be implemented in a reasonable timeframe at external sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"961-973"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12396900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2594-3633","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While electronic health record (EHR)-based tools for refugee health screening exist, support for other immigrant children has lagged. Reasons include lack of time, difficulty determining screening eligibility, and lack of awareness of screening recommendations. EHR-based tools to promote immigrant child health screening (ICHS) can address these challenges, but guidance is needed for tools that are usable by clinicians and acceptable to immigrant families.Develop useful EHR-based tools to support ICHS while incorporating evaluation of acceptability, usability, and implementation effort.We followed a five-step human-centered design approach to develop EHR-based tools for ICHS. This included: (1) representative users completing semi-structured interviews. (2) Health professionals and community advisory groups providing ongoing guidance. (3) Developing a functional prototype. (4) Usability testing of the prototype. And (5) an assessment of the implementation effort involving a second site installation coupled with expert implementation time estimations.Sixteen interviewees discussed screening barriers and how EHR-based tools could support discussing nativity (country of birth). From the interview findings and in consultation with advisory group members, we developed an EHR-based toolkit including noninterruptive alerts, an order set, and a documentation prompt. Ten clinicians completed usability testing. All recognized the alert and asked country of birth. Most (9) were satisfied with the system. All felt it was easy to use, helpful, and would not hinder patient care. Content experts (n = 8) estimated installation times (range: 4-20 hours, median 10) with high levels of confidence (range: 1-5, median 4). A second-site test installation required 7.25 hours.Our EHR-based tools designed with the guidance of experts were highly rated on usability and can help clinicians identify patients eligible for ICHS in a sensitive manner. Installation testing demonstrated that this content could be implemented in a reasonable timeframe at external sites.

移民儿童初级保健健康筛查临床决策支持的发展与评价。
背景:虽然存在基于电子健康记录(EHR)的难民健康筛查工具,但对其他移民儿童的支持却滞后。原因包括缺乏时间,难以确定筛查资格,以及缺乏对筛查建议的认识。促进移民儿童健康筛查(ICHS)的基于电子病历的工具可以解决这些挑战,但需要指导临床医生使用并为移民家庭所接受的工具。开发有用的基于ehr的工具来支持ICHS,同时结合可接受性、可用性和实施工作的评估。方法采用以人为本的5步设计方法开发基于ehr的ICHS工具。这包括:(1)代表性用户完成半结构化访谈。(2)提供持续指导的卫生专业人员和社区咨询小组。(3)开发功能原型。(4)原型可用性测试。(5)对涉及第二个站点安装的实施工作的评估,以及专家的实施时间估计。结果16位受访者讨论了筛查障碍以及基于电子病历的工具如何支持讨论出生(出生国)。根据访谈结果和咨询小组成员的意见,我们开发了一个基于ehr的工具包,包括非中断警报、订单集和文档提示。10名临床医生完成可用性测试。所有人都认出了警报,并询问了出生国家。大多数(9)对该系统感到满意。所有人都认为它易于使用,有帮助,不会妨碍病人的护理。内容专家(n=8)估计安装时间(范围为4-20小时,中位数为10小时),可信度很高(范围为1-5小时,中位数为4小时)。第二次现场测试安装需要7.25小时。结论在专家指导下设计的基于ehr的工具可用性评价较高,可以帮助临床医生敏感地识别符合ICHS条件的患者。安装测试表明,该内容可以在合理的时间框架内在外部站点上实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信