Accessible, not Exploitable: Navigating fraud prevention in disability research

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Disability and Health Journal Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-29 DOI:10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101843
Kelsey S. Goddard, Jean P. Hall, Noelle K. Kurth
{"title":"Accessible, not Exploitable: Navigating fraud prevention in disability research","authors":"Kelsey S. Goddard,&nbsp;Jean P. Hall,&nbsp;Noelle K. Kurth","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span>Disability-focused research is vital for informing policies and services that address the unique needs of people with disabilities. However, survey fraud poses a growing threat to the integrity of such research. Fraudulent responses, often facilitated by bots or scammers, disproportionately impact studies with small sample sizes, where even minimal distortion can significantly skew findings and misinform policy decisions. Compounding the issue, traditional fraud detection mechanisms, such as </span>CAPTCHA<span><span><span> tasks and automated response-time analysis, often exclude legitimate participants, particularly those who rely on assistive technologies or face accessibility barriers. This commentary examines the recruitment paradox inherent in disability research, where inclusive participation incentives inadvertently invite fraud while restrictive measures risk excluding genuine respondents. To address these dual challenges, we propose adaptive fraud detection tools, participatory design approaches, and equitable incentive structures that balance </span>inclusivity with data integrity. These strategies advance robust, representative findings to support effective and equitable </span>policy development.</span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":"18 4","pages":"Article 101843"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936657425000718","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disability-focused research is vital for informing policies and services that address the unique needs of people with disabilities. However, survey fraud poses a growing threat to the integrity of such research. Fraudulent responses, often facilitated by bots or scammers, disproportionately impact studies with small sample sizes, where even minimal distortion can significantly skew findings and misinform policy decisions. Compounding the issue, traditional fraud detection mechanisms, such as CAPTCHA tasks and automated response-time analysis, often exclude legitimate participants, particularly those who rely on assistive technologies or face accessibility barriers. This commentary examines the recruitment paradox inherent in disability research, where inclusive participation incentives inadvertently invite fraud while restrictive measures risk excluding genuine respondents. To address these dual challenges, we propose adaptive fraud detection tools, participatory design approaches, and equitable incentive structures that balance inclusivity with data integrity. These strategies advance robust, representative findings to support effective and equitable policy development.
无障碍,不可利用:导航欺诈预防残疾研究。
以残疾为重点的研究对于为满足残疾人独特需求的政策和服务提供信息至关重要。然而,调查欺诈对这类研究的完整性构成了越来越大的威胁。通常由机器人或骗子促成的欺诈性回复对小样本量的研究产生了不成比例的影响,即使是最小的扭曲也会严重扭曲研究结果并误导政策决定。更复杂的是,传统的欺诈检测机制,如CAPTCHA任务和自动响应时间分析,通常会排除合法参与者,特别是那些依赖辅助技术或面临访问障碍的参与者。这篇评论探讨了残疾研究中固有的招聘悖论,即包容性参与激励无意中引发了欺诈,而限制性措施可能会排除真正的受访者。为了应对这些双重挑战,我们提出了自适应欺诈检测工具、参与式设计方法和公平的激励结构,以平衡包容性和数据完整性。这些战略促进了有力的、具有代表性的调查结果,以支持有效和公平的政策制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Health Journal
Disability and Health Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
134
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Disability and Health Journal is a scientific, scholarly, and multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions that advance knowledge in disability and health. Topics may be related to global health, quality of life, and specific health conditions as they relate to disability. Such contributions include: • Reports of empirical research on the characteristics of persons with disabilities, environment, health outcomes, and determinants of health • Reports of empirical research on the Systematic or other evidence-based reviews and tightly conceived theoretical interpretations of research literature • Reports of empirical research on the Evaluative research on new interventions, technologies, and programs • Reports of empirical research on the Reports on issues or policies affecting the health and/or quality of life for persons with disabilities, using a scientific base.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书