Patient queue analysis as a component of Lean Six Sigma improvement in healthcare processes: a case study from a chemotherapy day unit.

IF 1 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Rowan Abuyadek, Abdalla Shehata, Wafaa Guirguis
{"title":"Patient queue analysis as a component of Lean Six Sigma improvement in healthcare processes: a case study from a chemotherapy day unit.","authors":"Rowan Abuyadek, Abdalla Shehata, Wafaa Guirguis","doi":"10.1108/IJHCQA-11-2024-0102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Oncology patients are a vulnerable group that faces multiple challenges, aggravated by long waiting times and service queues. This article aims to use Lean Six Sigma (LSS) to improve the chemotherapy preparation process and prospectively study the patient files' queue dynamics to prioritise process improvement remedies against adding resources strategy.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>Six Sigma methodology has been employed together with Lean tools and queue dynamics in a case study research in a chemotherapy day unit to define, measure, analyse, improve and control the problematic process. The study population involved all internal customers and a sample of external customers (<i>n</i> = 450). The study processes were measured by 25 data points.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The most frequent problem was the \"Long waiting time from oncologist assessment till receiving chemotherapy\". Mean value-added time for chemotherapy preparation was 42 min, the defect was any patient's waiting time exceeding it. The average pre-intervention waiting time was 65.5 ± 27.20 min. The defect baseline sigma level was 0.78 sigma. Remedies involved assigning two pharmacists, arranging the pharmacy setting to satisfy chemotherapy preparation steps, adjusting the number of patients/hours, standardising patients' files interarrival time, delivering files to the pharmacy by piece, not by batch, and fixing the printers and landlines. Post-intervention mean patient waiting time was reduced significantly to 58.7 ± 23.44 min (<i>p</i>-value = 0.05), and the defect sigma level was raised to 0.91 sigma.</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications: </strong>This study draws attention to prioritising process improvement remedies in complex care settings with long queues.</p><p><strong>Social implications: </strong>This study enhances service delivery and customer satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>This study serves as one of the few publications to study patient queue behaviour as a part of LSS improvements in healthcare projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":47455,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-11-2024-0102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Oncology patients are a vulnerable group that faces multiple challenges, aggravated by long waiting times and service queues. This article aims to use Lean Six Sigma (LSS) to improve the chemotherapy preparation process and prospectively study the patient files' queue dynamics to prioritise process improvement remedies against adding resources strategy.

Design/methodology/approach: Six Sigma methodology has been employed together with Lean tools and queue dynamics in a case study research in a chemotherapy day unit to define, measure, analyse, improve and control the problematic process. The study population involved all internal customers and a sample of external customers (n = 450). The study processes were measured by 25 data points.

Findings: The most frequent problem was the "Long waiting time from oncologist assessment till receiving chemotherapy". Mean value-added time for chemotherapy preparation was 42 min, the defect was any patient's waiting time exceeding it. The average pre-intervention waiting time was 65.5 ± 27.20 min. The defect baseline sigma level was 0.78 sigma. Remedies involved assigning two pharmacists, arranging the pharmacy setting to satisfy chemotherapy preparation steps, adjusting the number of patients/hours, standardising patients' files interarrival time, delivering files to the pharmacy by piece, not by batch, and fixing the printers and landlines. Post-intervention mean patient waiting time was reduced significantly to 58.7 ± 23.44 min (p-value = 0.05), and the defect sigma level was raised to 0.91 sigma.

Research limitations/implications: This study draws attention to prioritising process improvement remedies in complex care settings with long queues.

Social implications: This study enhances service delivery and customer satisfaction.

Originality/value: This study serves as one of the few publications to study patient queue behaviour as a part of LSS improvements in healthcare projects.

作为医疗保健流程精益六西格玛改进的组成部分的患者队列分析:来自化疗日间单位的案例研究。
目的:肿瘤患者是一个弱势群体,面临着多重挑战,长时间等待和服务排队加剧了这一挑战。本文旨在利用精益六西格玛(LSS)改进化疗制剂流程,并前瞻性地研究患者档案排队动态,以便在增加资源策略的情况下优先考虑流程改进措施。设计/方法/方法:六西格玛方法与精益工具和队列动力学一起应用于化疗日间单元的案例研究中,以定义、测量、分析、改进和控制有问题的过程。研究人群包括所有内部客户和外部客户样本(n = 450)。研究过程通过25个数据点进行测量。结果:最常见的问题是“从肿瘤医师评估到接受化疗的等待时间过长”。化疗准备的平均增值时间为42分钟,任何患者的等待时间超过该时间为缺陷。平均干预前等待时间为65.5±27.20 min,缺陷基线sigma水平为0.78 sigma。补救措施包括分配两名药剂师,安排药房设置以满足化疗准备步骤,调整患者/小时数,规范患者文件到达时间,按件而不是批量将文件送到药房,以及固定打印机和固定电话。干预后患者平均等待时间显著缩短至58.7±23.44 min (p值= 0.05),缺陷sigma水平提高至0.91 sigma。研究局限性/启示:本研究提请注意优先处理流程改进补救措施在复杂的护理设置与长队列。社会启示:本研究提升服务提供与顾客满意度。原创性/价值:本研究是为数不多的研究患者排队行为作为医疗保健项目中LSS改进的一部分的出版物之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: ■Successful quality/continuous improvement projects ■The use of quality tools and models in leadership management development such as the EFQM Excellence Model, Balanced Scorecard, Quality Standards, Managed Care ■Issues relating to process control such as Six Sigma, Leadership, Managing Change and Process Mapping ■Improving patient care through quality related programmes and/or research Articles that use quantitative and qualitative methods are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信