Informed Consent in Vulnerable Populations: The Case of Detained Persons with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

IF 1.7 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Stéphanie Baggio, Leonel da Cunha Gonçalves, Patrick Heller, Hans Wolff, Laurent Gétaz
{"title":"Informed Consent in Vulnerable Populations: The Case of Detained Persons with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.","authors":"Stéphanie Baggio, Leonel da Cunha Gonçalves, Patrick Heller, Hans Wolff, Laurent Gétaz","doi":"10.1177/15562646251340474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Informed consent (IC) is a critical component in research involving human participants, yet participants' understanding of consent information remains underexplored, particularly in vulnerable populations. This study aimed to assess whether attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was associated with understanding and willingness to sign the IC among detained individuals. This secondary analysis used data from a randomised trial conducted in a Swiss prison (n = 183). Statistical analyses included regression models. There was no significant difference in understanding of the IC between the groups with and without positive screening for ADHD (mean score = 5.2 vs. 4.9 respectively, <i>p</i> = .468). Acceptance of signing the IC was comparable between groups (83.3% ADHD vs. 84.9% non-ADHD, <i>p</i> = .814). Our findings suggest that ADHD did not significantly impair the understanding of the IC or the decision to participate in research among detained individuals. However, the level of understanding was overall low, highlighting the need for tailored approaches to improve understanding in vulnerable populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"15562646251340474"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646251340474","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Informed consent (IC) is a critical component in research involving human participants, yet participants' understanding of consent information remains underexplored, particularly in vulnerable populations. This study aimed to assess whether attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was associated with understanding and willingness to sign the IC among detained individuals. This secondary analysis used data from a randomised trial conducted in a Swiss prison (n = 183). Statistical analyses included regression models. There was no significant difference in understanding of the IC between the groups with and without positive screening for ADHD (mean score = 5.2 vs. 4.9 respectively, p = .468). Acceptance of signing the IC was comparable between groups (83.3% ADHD vs. 84.9% non-ADHD, p = .814). Our findings suggest that ADHD did not significantly impair the understanding of the IC or the decision to participate in research among detained individuals. However, the level of understanding was overall low, highlighting the need for tailored approaches to improve understanding in vulnerable populations.

弱势群体的知情同意:患有注意缺陷多动障碍的被拘留者的案例。
在涉及人类参与者的研究中,知情同意(IC)是一个关键组成部分,但参与者对同意信息的理解仍未得到充分探索,特别是在弱势群体中。本研究旨在评估被拘留者注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是否与理解和意愿签署IC相关。该二次分析使用了在瑞士监狱进行的随机试验的数据(n = 183)。统计分析包括回归模型。ADHD筛查阳性组和未筛查阳性组对IC的理解无显著差异(平均得分分别为5.2和4.9,p = .468)。在IC上签字的接受度在两组之间具有可比性(ADHD为83.3%,非ADHD为84.9%,p = .814)。我们的研究结果表明,ADHD并没有显著损害被拘留者对IC的理解或参与研究的决定。然而,总体上的理解水平较低,这突出表明需要有针对性的方法来提高弱势群体的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (JERHRE) is the only journal in the field of human research ethics dedicated exclusively to empirical research. Empirical knowledge translates ethical principles into procedures appropriate to specific cultures, contexts, and research topics. The journal''s distinguished editorial and advisory board brings a range of expertise and international perspective to provide high-quality double-blind peer-reviewed original articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信