Tele-assessment of trunk control in children with cerebral palsy: Intra- and inter-rater reliability, and validity of the trunk control measurement scale.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sefa Üneş, Merve Tunçdemir, Cemil Özal, Kivanç Delioğlu, Kübra Seyhan Bıyık, Mintaze Kerem Günel
{"title":"Tele-assessment of trunk control in children with cerebral palsy: Intra- and inter-rater reliability, and validity of the trunk control measurement scale.","authors":"Sefa Üneş, Merve Tunçdemir, Cemil Özal, Kivanç Delioğlu, Kübra Seyhan Bıyık, Mintaze Kerem Günel","doi":"10.1177/1357633X251336009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThe aim of the study was to evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability, and validity of the Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS) for tele-assessment in children with cerebral palsy (CP).MethodA cross-sectional study was conducted with 36 children aged 4-18 years, diagnosed with hemiplegic CP. Participants underwent four TCMS assessments: in-person assessment, tele-assessment via videoconferencing, and two video-based tele-assessments scored by same rater and by a second rater. Reliability was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing TCMS tele-assessment scores between children with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I and II, while criterion validity was evaluated by examining the correlation between face-to-face and tele-assessment TCMS scores.ResultsExcellent reliability was observed between face-to-face and tele-assessment (ICC: 0.91; 95%CI: 0.83-0.95). TCMS tele-assessment also demonstrated excellent intra-rater reliability (ICC: 0.90, 95%CI: 0.80-0.94) and high inter-rater reliability (ICC: 0.82, 95%CI: 0.66-0.90). Criterion validity was confirmed by strong correlations between face-to-face and tele-assessment scores (<i>r</i> = 0.925, and <i>r</i> = 0.892, <i>p</i> < 0.001 for rater-1 and rater-2, respectively). The TCMS successfully discriminated children by functional levels, demonstrating discriminative validity (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Bland-Altman analysis revealed minimal systematic error, with internal consistency remaining high across all assessments (>0.88).DiscussionTCMS is a valid and reliable tool for teleassessing trunk control in children with hemiplegic CP. These results may pave the way for developing child-specific, targeted telerehabilitation programs, bringing telerehabilitation closer to its primary aim of ensuring equal opportunities.This study was registered as a clinical trial (NCT06707831). https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06707831.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"1357633X251336009"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X251336009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionThe aim of the study was to evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability, and validity of the Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS) for tele-assessment in children with cerebral palsy (CP).MethodA cross-sectional study was conducted with 36 children aged 4-18 years, diagnosed with hemiplegic CP. Participants underwent four TCMS assessments: in-person assessment, tele-assessment via videoconferencing, and two video-based tele-assessments scored by same rater and by a second rater. Reliability was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing TCMS tele-assessment scores between children with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I and II, while criterion validity was evaluated by examining the correlation between face-to-face and tele-assessment TCMS scores.ResultsExcellent reliability was observed between face-to-face and tele-assessment (ICC: 0.91; 95%CI: 0.83-0.95). TCMS tele-assessment also demonstrated excellent intra-rater reliability (ICC: 0.90, 95%CI: 0.80-0.94) and high inter-rater reliability (ICC: 0.82, 95%CI: 0.66-0.90). Criterion validity was confirmed by strong correlations between face-to-face and tele-assessment scores (r = 0.925, and r = 0.892, p < 0.001 for rater-1 and rater-2, respectively). The TCMS successfully discriminated children by functional levels, demonstrating discriminative validity (p = 0.002). Bland-Altman analysis revealed minimal systematic error, with internal consistency remaining high across all assessments (>0.88).DiscussionTCMS is a valid and reliable tool for teleassessing trunk control in children with hemiplegic CP. These results may pave the way for developing child-specific, targeted telerehabilitation programs, bringing telerehabilitation closer to its primary aim of ensuring equal opportunities.This study was registered as a clinical trial (NCT06707831). https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06707831.

脑瘫患儿躯干控制的远程评估:躯干控制量表的信度和效度。
摘要本研究旨在评估主干控制量表(TCMS)用于脑瘫儿童远程评估的信度和效度。方法对36例4-18岁的偏瘫CP患儿进行横断面研究,接受四项TCMS评估:面对面评估、视频会议远程评估和两项基于视频的远程评估,分别由同一评分者和第二评分者评分。采用类内相关系数(ICC)分析信度。通过比较大运动功能分类系统(GMFCS) I级和II级儿童的TCMS远程评估得分来评估判别效度,通过检测面对面与远程评估TCMS得分之间的相关性来评估标准效度。结果面对面评估与远程评估具有良好的信度(ICC: 0.91;95%置信区间:0.83—-0.95)。TCMS远程评估也表现出优异的评估内信度(ICC: 0.90, 95%CI: 0.80-0.94)和高评估间信度(ICC: 0.82, 95%CI: 0.66-0.90)。面对面和远程评估得分之间的强相关性证实了标准效度(r = 0.925, r = 0.892, p = 0.002)。Bland-Altman分析显示最小的系统误差,所有评估的内部一致性仍然很高(>0.88)。tcms是远程评估偏瘫CP儿童躯干控制的有效和可靠的工具。这些结果可能为开发针对儿童的、有针对性的远程康复计划铺平道路,使远程康复更接近其确保机会均等的主要目标。本研究注册为临床试验(NCT06707831)。https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06707831。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信