Effect of telerehabilitation on post-COVID-19 individuals with long-term dyspnea: A randomized controlled study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Canan Demir, Cihan Caner Aksoy, Gulhan Yilmaz Gokmen, Dilber Durmaz
{"title":"Effect of telerehabilitation on post-COVID-19 individuals with long-term dyspnea: A randomized controlled study.","authors":"Canan Demir, Cihan Caner Aksoy, Gulhan Yilmaz Gokmen, Dilber Durmaz","doi":"10.1177/1357633X251333903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine the effectiveness of telerehabilitation in managing ongoing dyspnea and associated issues following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and observe changes over time.DesignThe study included 36 participants who previously had COVID-19 but continued to experience dyspnea (mean age, 42.44 ± 15.51 years). The participants were randomly allocated into three groups: telerehabilitation (TRG), home exercise (HEG), and control (CG). Dyspnea level, exercise capacity, muscle oxygenation, respiratory function, and fatigue were evaluated at baseline, at 6th, and at 12th weeks. Telerehabilitation was performed supervised and synchronously via video-calls.ResultsAt the 6-week assessment, TRG showed significant improvements in dyspnea, fatigue (p < 0.001), exercise capacity (p = 0.001), and respiratory muscle strength (p < 0.001). By the 12th week, these gains were maintained, with no further changes from week 6. In HEG, dyspnea and fatigue improved at weeks 6 and 12 (p < 0.001), with no additional changes between these time points. In CG, only dyspnea improved at both assessments (p < 0.001); other parameters remained unchanged. TRG achieved greater benefits compared to CG in reducing dyspnea and fatigue at week 6 (p = 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively), but no group differences were found at week 12 (p > 0.05). No changes in muscle oxygenation were observed in any groups or evaluation points (p > 0.05).ConclusionsTelerehabilitation effectively improved and sustained dyspnea, fatigue, respiratory muscle strength, and exercise capacity in patients with post-COVID, while home-based exercises only reduced dyspnea and fatigue. Supervised and structured telerehabilitation may be a viable approach to managing post-COVID-19 symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"1357633X251333903"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X251333903","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine the effectiveness of telerehabilitation in managing ongoing dyspnea and associated issues following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and observe changes over time.DesignThe study included 36 participants who previously had COVID-19 but continued to experience dyspnea (mean age, 42.44 ± 15.51 years). The participants were randomly allocated into three groups: telerehabilitation (TRG), home exercise (HEG), and control (CG). Dyspnea level, exercise capacity, muscle oxygenation, respiratory function, and fatigue were evaluated at baseline, at 6th, and at 12th weeks. Telerehabilitation was performed supervised and synchronously via video-calls.ResultsAt the 6-week assessment, TRG showed significant improvements in dyspnea, fatigue (p < 0.001), exercise capacity (p = 0.001), and respiratory muscle strength (p < 0.001). By the 12th week, these gains were maintained, with no further changes from week 6. In HEG, dyspnea and fatigue improved at weeks 6 and 12 (p < 0.001), with no additional changes between these time points. In CG, only dyspnea improved at both assessments (p < 0.001); other parameters remained unchanged. TRG achieved greater benefits compared to CG in reducing dyspnea and fatigue at week 6 (p = 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively), but no group differences were found at week 12 (p > 0.05). No changes in muscle oxygenation were observed in any groups or evaluation points (p > 0.05).ConclusionsTelerehabilitation effectively improved and sustained dyspnea, fatigue, respiratory muscle strength, and exercise capacity in patients with post-COVID, while home-based exercises only reduced dyspnea and fatigue. Supervised and structured telerehabilitation may be a viable approach to managing post-COVID-19 symptoms.

远程康复对covid -19后长期呼吸困难患者的影响:一项随机对照研究
目的本研究旨在确定远程康复治疗冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)后持续呼吸困难及相关问题的有效性,并观察随时间的变化。该研究包括36名先前患有COVID-19但仍经历呼吸困难的参与者(平均年龄42.44±15.51岁)。参与者被随机分为三组:远程康复组(TRG)、家庭锻炼组(HEG)和对照组(CG)。在基线、第6周和第12周时评估呼吸困难水平、运动能力、肌肉氧合、呼吸功能和疲劳。远程康复是通过视频通话进行监督和同步的。结果在6周的评估中,TRG在呼吸困难、疲劳方面有显著改善(p < 0.05)。各组及各评价点肌肉氧合无明显变化(p < 0.05)。结论康复治疗可有效改善和维持新冠肺炎后患者的呼吸困难、疲劳、呼吸肌力量和运动能力,而居家锻炼仅能减轻呼吸困难和疲劳。有监督和有组织的远程康复可能是治疗covid -19后症状的可行方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信