Cost-Effectiveness of a Community First Responder System for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Poland.

IF 2.1 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-05-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S510907
Jerzy Jaskuła, Goran Medic, Sanjay Verma, Joachim Maurer, Tom A Kooy, Bianca de Greef
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of a Community First Responder System for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Poland.","authors":"Jerzy Jaskuła, Goran Medic, Sanjay Verma, Joachim Maurer, Tom A Kooy, Bianca de Greef","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S510907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) is a significant public health issue in Poland, with only an 8.4% survival rate to hospital discharge. Early initiation of Basic Life Support and defibrillation through a Community First Responder (CFR) system can markedly improve survival rates and neurological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A decision tree and Markov model compared the cost-effectiveness of three scenarios against standard care by estimating costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Scenario 1 involved raising public awareness and educating on the 30:2 CPR protocol. Scenario 2 added equipping blue-light service vehicles with Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) and training personnel. Scenario 3 implemented a full CFR system with integrated AEDs, dispatch centers, and trained citizen responders. The analysis included survival to hospital discharge, with sensitivity analyses assessing robustness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were €15,221 for Scenario 1, €30,659 for Scenario 2, and €16,205 for Scenario 3 per QALY gained-all below the threshold of €50,197. Improvements were observed in all stages, including survival to hospital discharge and neurologically intact survival. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing a CFR system in Poland is a cost-effective strategy that enhances survival rates after OHCA at an acceptable cost per QALY. The study emphasizes the importance of AED accessibility, trained CFRs, and streamlined emergency responses to improve survival and quality of life for OHCA patients. These findings support policy development and resource allocation to strengthen Poland's emergency medical response to OHCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"375-386"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12054549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S510907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) is a significant public health issue in Poland, with only an 8.4% survival rate to hospital discharge. Early initiation of Basic Life Support and defibrillation through a Community First Responder (CFR) system can markedly improve survival rates and neurological outcomes.

Methods: A decision tree and Markov model compared the cost-effectiveness of three scenarios against standard care by estimating costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Scenario 1 involved raising public awareness and educating on the 30:2 CPR protocol. Scenario 2 added equipping blue-light service vehicles with Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) and training personnel. Scenario 3 implemented a full CFR system with integrated AEDs, dispatch centers, and trained citizen responders. The analysis included survival to hospital discharge, with sensitivity analyses assessing robustness.

Results: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were €15,221 for Scenario 1, €30,659 for Scenario 2, and €16,205 for Scenario 3 per QALY gained-all below the threshold of €50,197. Improvements were observed in all stages, including survival to hospital discharge and neurologically intact survival. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results.

Conclusion: Implementing a CFR system in Poland is a cost-effective strategy that enhances survival rates after OHCA at an acceptable cost per QALY. The study emphasizes the importance of AED accessibility, trained CFRs, and streamlined emergency responses to improve survival and quality of life for OHCA patients. These findings support policy development and resource allocation to strengthen Poland's emergency medical response to OHCA.

波兰院外心脏骤停社区第一反应系统的成本效益
目的:院外心脏骤停(OHCA)在波兰是一个重要的公共卫生问题,只有8.4%的存活率出院。通过社区第一反应者(CFR)系统早期开始基本生命支持和除颤可以显着提高生存率和神经预后。方法:通过估算成本和质量调整生命年(QALYs),采用决策树和马尔可夫模型比较三种方案与标准治疗的成本-效果。方案一涉及提高公众意识,并对30:2心肺复苏术规程进行教育。方案2增加了为蓝光服务车辆配备自动体外除颤器(aed)和培训人员。场景3实现了一个完整的CFR系统,集成了aed、调度中心和训练有素的市民响应人员。分析包括存活至出院,用敏感性分析评估稳健性。结果:每个QALY的增量成本效益比(ICERs)在情景1中为15,221欧元,在情景2中为30,659欧元,在情景3中为16,205欧元,均低于50,197欧元的阈值。在所有阶段均观察到改善,包括存活至出院和神经完整存活。概率敏感性分析证实了结果的稳健性。结论:在波兰实施CFR系统是一种具有成本效益的策略,可以在每个QALY可接受的成本下提高OHCA后的生存率。该研究强调了AED可及性、训练有素的cfr和简化的应急反应对改善OHCA患者的生存和生活质量的重要性。这些调查结果支持制定政策和分配资源,以加强波兰对OHCA的紧急医疗反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信