The clinical decision-making of Vietnamese nursing students and related factors: A cross-sectional survey.

IF 1.1 Q3 NURSING
Belitung Nursing Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.33546/bnj.3686
Tran Binh Yen Quach, Thi Phuong Lan Nguyen, Thuy Phuong Hong Huynh
{"title":"The clinical decision-making of Vietnamese nursing students and related factors: A cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Tran Binh Yen Quach, Thi Phuong Lan Nguyen, Thuy Phuong Hong Huynh","doi":"10.33546/bnj.3686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical decision-making is a critical competency in nursing, influencing patient safety and career satisfaction. However, the factors shaping clinical decision-making remain underexplored, particularly in Vietnam, where research on this topic is limited. Understanding these factors is essential for enhancing nursing education and clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess clinical decision-making skills among nursing students, examining their relationship with students' characteristics, perceptions of the clinical environment, and grade point average (GPA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study surveyed 189 nursing students in the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City using an online questionnaire in June 2021. Clinical decision-making styles were assessed using the Nurses Decision-Making Instrument Revised - 2014 (NDMI-R14), and the clinical learning environment (CLE) was evaluated with the Vietnamese-CLEI. To assess differences between variables, Chi-square tests were applied, or Fisher's exact tests where appropriate. Correlation between variables was examined using Pearson's correlation coefficient for parametric data or Spearman's rank correlation for non-parametric data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average clinical decision-making score was 68.6, with 67.7% of students demonstrating a quasi-rational decision-making style and 32.3% relying solely on analysis. Notably, no students reported exclusively intuitive decision-making. Significant negative correlations were identified between clinical decision-making scores and extracurricular activities (<i>r</i> = -0.20, <i>p</i> = 0.005), clinical learning environment (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i> (187) = -0.16, <i>p</i> = 0.027), and GPA (<i>r</i> = -0.18, <i>p</i> = 0.011). These findings suggest that students with higher academic performance and greater extracurricular involvement were less likely to rely on intuitive decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vietnamese nursing students predominantly exhibited a quasi-rational decision-making style, combining intuition and analysis. However, students with higher GPA and extracurricular engagement showed reduced intuitive reasoning, highlighting a potential gap in their decision-making development. Nursing education programs in Vietnam should focus on fostering analytical and intuitive reasoning skills to prepare students for complex clinical environments. Further research is needed to explore the cultural, educational, and contextual factors influencing these patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":42002,"journal":{"name":"Belitung Nursing Journal","volume":"11 2","pages":"126-132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12006804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belitung Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.3686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical decision-making is a critical competency in nursing, influencing patient safety and career satisfaction. However, the factors shaping clinical decision-making remain underexplored, particularly in Vietnam, where research on this topic is limited. Understanding these factors is essential for enhancing nursing education and clinical practice.

Objective: To assess clinical decision-making skills among nursing students, examining their relationship with students' characteristics, perceptions of the clinical environment, and grade point average (GPA).

Methods: This cross-sectional study surveyed 189 nursing students in the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City using an online questionnaire in June 2021. Clinical decision-making styles were assessed using the Nurses Decision-Making Instrument Revised - 2014 (NDMI-R14), and the clinical learning environment (CLE) was evaluated with the Vietnamese-CLEI. To assess differences between variables, Chi-square tests were applied, or Fisher's exact tests where appropriate. Correlation between variables was examined using Pearson's correlation coefficient for parametric data or Spearman's rank correlation for non-parametric data.

Results: The average clinical decision-making score was 68.6, with 67.7% of students demonstrating a quasi-rational decision-making style and 32.3% relying solely on analysis. Notably, no students reported exclusively intuitive decision-making. Significant negative correlations were identified between clinical decision-making scores and extracurricular activities (r = -0.20, p = 0.005), clinical learning environment (rs (187) = -0.16, p = 0.027), and GPA (r = -0.18, p = 0.011). These findings suggest that students with higher academic performance and greater extracurricular involvement were less likely to rely on intuitive decision-making.

Conclusion: Vietnamese nursing students predominantly exhibited a quasi-rational decision-making style, combining intuition and analysis. However, students with higher GPA and extracurricular engagement showed reduced intuitive reasoning, highlighting a potential gap in their decision-making development. Nursing education programs in Vietnam should focus on fostering analytical and intuitive reasoning skills to prepare students for complex clinical environments. Further research is needed to explore the cultural, educational, and contextual factors influencing these patterns.

越南护生临床决策及相关因素的横断面调查。
研究背景:临床决策能力是护理中的一项重要能力,影响患者安全和职业满意度。然而,影响临床决策的因素仍未得到充分探讨,特别是在越南,对这一主题的研究有限。了解这些因素对加强护理教育和临床实践至关重要。目的:评估护生的临床决策能力,探讨其与学生特征、临床环境感知和平均绩点(GPA)的关系。方法:本横断面研究于2021年6月对胡志明市医药大学189名护理专业学生进行了在线问卷调查。临床决策风格采用护士决策量表(NDMI-R14)进行评估,临床学习环境(CLE)采用越南语- clei进行评估。为了评估变量之间的差异,应用卡方检验,或适当的Fisher精确检验。变量之间的相关性采用参数数据的Pearson相关系数或非参数数据的Spearman秩相关来检验。结果:临床决策平均得分为68.6分,67.7%的学生表现出准理性决策风格,32.3%的学生完全依靠分析。值得注意的是,没有学生报告完全凭直觉做出决策。临床决策得分与课外活动(r = -0.20, p = 0.005)、临床学习环境(rs (187) = -0.16, p = 0.027)、GPA (r = -0.18, p = 0.011)呈显著负相关。这些发现表明,学习成绩高、课外活动多的学生不太可能依赖直觉决策。结论:越南护生主要表现为准理性、直觉与分析相结合的决策风格。然而,GPA较高、课外参与度较高的学生的直觉推理能力较差,这凸显了他们在决策发展方面的潜在差距。越南的护理教育项目应注重培养学生的分析和直觉推理能力,使他们为复杂的临床环境做好准备。需要进一步的研究来探索影响这些模式的文化、教育和背景因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
42.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信