Psycometric Validation of an Instrument to Measure Person-Centred Teamwork in Hospital Settings.

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING
Nursing Research and Practice Pub Date : 2025-04-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/nrp/2185757
Alida Viljoen, Ronell Leech, Paul Slater, Andries Masenge, Tanya Heyns
{"title":"Psycometric Validation of an Instrument to Measure Person-Centred Teamwork in Hospital Settings.","authors":"Alida Viljoen, Ronell Leech, Paul Slater, Andries Masenge, Tanya Heyns","doi":"10.1155/nrp/2185757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To validate an instrument for measuring healthcare workers' perceptions of person-centred teamwork in hospital units. <b>Design:</b> Quantitative cross-sectional descriptive design. This approach collected numerical data to explore and describe the characteristics of the instrument items, with the goal of generating insights as to the validity and reliability of the items. <b>Methods:</b> The target population included healthcare workers who worked in hospital settings. Total sampling was used to identify healthcare workers. Convenience sampling was used to select the participants. The participants completed the instrument. The data were captured and analysed using the software IBM SPSS Statistics Version 28 and RStudio 2023.06. <b>Results:</b> A 38-item instrument measuring the perceptions of healthcare workers of person-centred teamwork was tested psychometrically. A total of 388 healthcare workers working in private (<i>n</i> = 160) and public (<i>n</i> = 228) hospitals completed the instrument. Confirmatory factor analysis was used, indicating that the items were significant and that the constructs were well measured. Factor loading was present, and bifactor analysis confirmed the multidimensionality of each construct. The Cronbach's <i>α</i> confirmed the reliability of each of the 38 items. <b>Conclusion:</b> The person-centred teamwork instrument was reliable and validated as a multidimensional scale comprising 38 items. The instrument is psychometrically suitable for measuring person-centred teamwork in hospital settings. <b>Implications:</b> The person-centred teamwork instrument provides the ability to measure person-centred teamwork efforts to improve practice. As a measurable concept, person-centred teamwork can be improved by distinguishing areas for improvement. <b>Link to Practice:</b> The 38 item person-centred teamwork instrument indicated good fit for measuring the constructs, and the instrument was validated. Each of the items was reliable for measuring person-centred teamwork. The instrument can be applied internationally to assist in the measurement of person-centred teamwork practices to improve clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46917,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research and Practice","volume":"2025 ","pages":"2185757"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009176/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/nrp/2185757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To validate an instrument for measuring healthcare workers' perceptions of person-centred teamwork in hospital units. Design: Quantitative cross-sectional descriptive design. This approach collected numerical data to explore and describe the characteristics of the instrument items, with the goal of generating insights as to the validity and reliability of the items. Methods: The target population included healthcare workers who worked in hospital settings. Total sampling was used to identify healthcare workers. Convenience sampling was used to select the participants. The participants completed the instrument. The data were captured and analysed using the software IBM SPSS Statistics Version 28 and RStudio 2023.06. Results: A 38-item instrument measuring the perceptions of healthcare workers of person-centred teamwork was tested psychometrically. A total of 388 healthcare workers working in private (n = 160) and public (n = 228) hospitals completed the instrument. Confirmatory factor analysis was used, indicating that the items were significant and that the constructs were well measured. Factor loading was present, and bifactor analysis confirmed the multidimensionality of each construct. The Cronbach's α confirmed the reliability of each of the 38 items. Conclusion: The person-centred teamwork instrument was reliable and validated as a multidimensional scale comprising 38 items. The instrument is psychometrically suitable for measuring person-centred teamwork in hospital settings. Implications: The person-centred teamwork instrument provides the ability to measure person-centred teamwork efforts to improve practice. As a measurable concept, person-centred teamwork can be improved by distinguishing areas for improvement. Link to Practice: The 38 item person-centred teamwork instrument indicated good fit for measuring the constructs, and the instrument was validated. Each of the items was reliable for measuring person-centred teamwork. The instrument can be applied internationally to assist in the measurement of person-centred teamwork practices to improve clinical outcomes.

一种在医院环境中测量以人为中心的团队合作的工具的心理计量学验证。
目的:验证一种测量医疗工作者对医院单位以人为本的团队合作的看法的工具。设计:定量横断面描述性设计。这种方法收集数值数据来探索和描述仪器项目的特征,目的是产生对项目的有效性和可靠性的见解。方法:目标人群包括在医院工作的医护人员。采用总抽样来确定卫生保健工作者。采用方便抽样的方法选择研究对象。参与者完成了仪器。使用IBM SPSS Statistics Version 28和RStudio 2023.06软件对数据进行捕获和分析。结果:采用心理计量学方法对38个项目的医疗工作者对以人为本的团队合作的看法进行了测试。共有388名在私立医院(n = 160)和公立医院(n = 228)工作的医护人员完成了该工具。使用验证性因子分析,表明项目是显著的,结构是很好的测量。因子负载存在,双因子分析证实了每个结构的多维性。Cronbach’s α验证了38个条目的可靠性。结论:以人为本的团队合作量表具有较强的可靠性,是一个包含38个项目的多维度量表。该仪器在心理测量学上适用于测量医院环境中以人为中心的团队合作。含义:以人为本的团队合作工具提供了衡量以人为本的团队合作努力的能力,以改善实践。作为一个可测量的概念,以人为本的团队合作可以通过区分需要改进的领域来改进。与实践的联系:38项以人为本的团队合作工具表明很适合测量构念,并且该工具得到了验证。每一个项目都是可靠的衡量以人为本的团队合作。该仪器可以在国际上应用,以协助测量以人为本的团队合作实践,以改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信