Serum Biomarkers as Adjuncts to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Head Injury Guidelines (NG232, 2023) When Selecting Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury for Computed Tomography: A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury Study.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Daniel Whitehouse, Ana Mikolić, Endre Czeiter, Sophie Richter, Andras Buki, Kevin K Wang, Ewout Steyerberg, Andrew Maas, David Menon, Fiona Lecky, Virginia Newcombe
{"title":"Serum Biomarkers as Adjuncts to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Head Injury Guidelines (NG232, 2023) When Selecting Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury for Computed Tomography: A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury Study.","authors":"Daniel Whitehouse, Ana Mikolić, Endre Czeiter, Sophie Richter, Andras Buki, Kevin K Wang, Ewout Steyerberg, Andrew Maas, David Menon, Fiona Lecky, Virginia Newcombe","doi":"10.1089/neu.2024.0276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explores the diagnostic performance of a panel of six biomarkers (glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], neurofilament light [NFL], neuron-specific enolase [NSE], S100 calcium-binding protein B [S100B], total tau [t-tau], and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 [UCH-L1]) in the context of the \"2023 UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Head Injury: Assessment and early management (NG232)\" guideline. Emphasis is placed on subjects where clinical equipoise remains concerning the decision for head computed tomography (CT), medium-risk subjects. All adult subjects from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) dataset with a complete biomarker profile and interpretable CT scan within 24 h of injury were classified as high, medium, and low-risk according to the NICE NG232 Clinical Decision Rule (CDR) for CT head imaging following head injury. In subjects classified as medium-risk, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the diagnostic performance of biomarkers to identify those with (1) CT abnormality or (2) potential neurosurgical lesion, with CT considered the gold standard diagnosis. A time-to-biomarker sub-analysis was performed in subjects with a time from injury to sampling within 6 h, in keeping with current clinical usage of biomarkers. Among 1979 CENTER-TBI participants with sufficient clinical information to facilitate classification, 385 subjects were classified as medium-risk. Biomarker concentrations were significantly higher in those with traumatic CT abnormalities as compared with those without for all biomarkers aside from NSE (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). When sampled within 24 h of injury, GFAP demonstrated the best diagnostic performance for CT abnormality (AUC 0.81 [0.77-0.86]), with NFL, t-tau, and UCH-L1 showing moderate performance. At a threshold to provide a 95% sensitivity, GFAP, NFL, t-tau, and UCH-L1 demonstrated specificities ranging from 18% to 33% corresponding to a potential reduction of total CT images performed in these subjects by 14-23%. S100B and UCH-L1 showed improved performance when biomarker sampling time was limited to 6 h following injury. In intoxicated subjects with a persistent Glasgow Coma Score of 13-14, biomarker levels were significantly higher in subjects with CT abnormality as compared with those without. In conclusion, serum biomarkers demonstrate potential for the reduction in CT scan requirements in those classified as medium-risk in reference to the NG232 CDR criteria. These results highlight a need for further prospective studies on the use of diagnostic TBI biomarkers in current emergency medicine practice, with future consideration given to the integration of biomarkers in the NICE NG232 head injury guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2024.0276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the diagnostic performance of a panel of six biomarkers (glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], neurofilament light [NFL], neuron-specific enolase [NSE], S100 calcium-binding protein B [S100B], total tau [t-tau], and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 [UCH-L1]) in the context of the "2023 UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Head Injury: Assessment and early management (NG232)" guideline. Emphasis is placed on subjects where clinical equipoise remains concerning the decision for head computed tomography (CT), medium-risk subjects. All adult subjects from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) dataset with a complete biomarker profile and interpretable CT scan within 24 h of injury were classified as high, medium, and low-risk according to the NICE NG232 Clinical Decision Rule (CDR) for CT head imaging following head injury. In subjects classified as medium-risk, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the diagnostic performance of biomarkers to identify those with (1) CT abnormality or (2) potential neurosurgical lesion, with CT considered the gold standard diagnosis. A time-to-biomarker sub-analysis was performed in subjects with a time from injury to sampling within 6 h, in keeping with current clinical usage of biomarkers. Among 1979 CENTER-TBI participants with sufficient clinical information to facilitate classification, 385 subjects were classified as medium-risk. Biomarker concentrations were significantly higher in those with traumatic CT abnormalities as compared with those without for all biomarkers aside from NSE (all p < 0.05). When sampled within 24 h of injury, GFAP demonstrated the best diagnostic performance for CT abnormality (AUC 0.81 [0.77-0.86]), with NFL, t-tau, and UCH-L1 showing moderate performance. At a threshold to provide a 95% sensitivity, GFAP, NFL, t-tau, and UCH-L1 demonstrated specificities ranging from 18% to 33% corresponding to a potential reduction of total CT images performed in these subjects by 14-23%. S100B and UCH-L1 showed improved performance when biomarker sampling time was limited to 6 h following injury. In intoxicated subjects with a persistent Glasgow Coma Score of 13-14, biomarker levels were significantly higher in subjects with CT abnormality as compared with those without. In conclusion, serum biomarkers demonstrate potential for the reduction in CT scan requirements in those classified as medium-risk in reference to the NG232 CDR criteria. These results highlight a need for further prospective studies on the use of diagnostic TBI biomarkers in current emergency medicine practice, with future consideration given to the integration of biomarkers in the NICE NG232 head injury guidelines.

在选择外伤性脑损伤患者进行计算机断层扫描时,血清生物标志物作为国家健康与护理研究所卓越头部损伤指南(NG232, 2023)的辅助手段:外伤性脑损伤研究中的欧洲神经创伤有效性合作研究。
本文在“2023年英国国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)头部损伤:评估和早期管理(NG232)”指南的背景下,探讨了一组六种生物标志物(胶质纤维酸性蛋白[GFAP],神经丝光[NFL],神经元特异性烯醇化酶[NSE], S100钙结合蛋白B [S100B],总tau [t-tau]和泛素c端水解酶L1 [UCH-L1])的诊断性能。重点放在临床平衡仍然涉及头部计算机断层扫描(CT)的决定,中等风险的受试者。所有来自欧洲创伤性脑损伤协同神经创伤有效性研究(CENTER-TBI)数据集的成人受试者,具有完整的生物标志物特征和损伤后24小时内可解释的CT扫描,根据NICE NG232脑损伤后CT头部成像临床决策规则(CDR),被分为高、中、低风险。在中等风险的受试者中,使用受试者工作特征曲线下的面积(AUC)来评估生物标志物的诊断性能,以识别(1)CT异常或(2)潜在的神经外科病变,CT被认为是金标准诊断。根据目前生物标志物的临床使用情况,对受试者从受伤到采样的时间在6小时内进行了时间到生物标志物的亚分析。在1979名有足够临床信息便于分类的CENTER-TBI参与者中,385名受试者被分类为中危。除NSE外,创伤性CT异常组的生物标志物浓度均显著高于非创伤性CT异常组(p < 0.05)。在损伤后24小时内取样时,GFAP对CT异常的诊断效果最好(AUC为0.81 [0.77-0.86]),NFL、t-tau和UCH-L1的诊断效果中等。在提供95%灵敏度的阈值下,GFAP、NFL、t-tau和UCH-L1显示的特异性范围为18%至33%,对应于在这些受试者中执行的总CT图像的潜在减少14-23%。当生物标志物采样时间限制在损伤后6小时时,S100B和UCH-L1表现出更好的性能。在格拉斯哥昏迷评分为13-14的醉酒受试者中,有CT异常的受试者的生物标志物水平明显高于没有CT异常的受试者。总之,血清生物标志物显示了根据NG232 CDR标准分类为中等风险的患者CT扫描需求减少的潜力。这些结果强调了在当前急诊医学实践中使用诊断性脑损伤生物标志物的进一步前瞻性研究的必要性,未来应考虑将生物标志物纳入NICE NG232脑损伤指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurotrauma
Journal of neurotrauma 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurotrauma is the flagship, peer-reviewed publication for reporting on the latest advances in both the clinical and laboratory investigation of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. The Journal focuses on the basic pathobiology of injury to the central nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving both the early management and long-term care and recovery of traumatically injured patients. This is the essential journal publishing cutting-edge basic and translational research in traumatically injured human and animal studies, with emphasis on neurodegenerative disease research linked to CNS trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信