Target-Controlled Infusion of Propofol: A Systematic Review of Recent Results.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Pavla Šafránková, Jan Bruthans
{"title":"Target-Controlled Infusion of Propofol: A Systematic Review of Recent Results.","authors":"Pavla Šafránková, Jan Bruthans","doi":"10.1007/s10916-025-02187-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study presents a systematic review conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, evaluating pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) models for target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol. A structured search was performed across PubMed, Summon, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus, identifying 427 sources, of which 17 met the inclusion criteria. The analysis revealed that nine studies compared existing models, six focused on the development of new PK-PD models, and two explored broader implications of TCI in anesthesia. Comparative studies indicate that while the Eleveld model generally offers superior predictive accuracy, it does not consistently outperform the Marsh and Schnider models across all populations. The Schnider model demonstrated better bias control in elderly patients, while the Eleveld model improved drug clearance estimation in obese patients. However, inconsistencies remain in predicting brain concentrations of propofol. Newly proposed models introduce adaptive dosing strategies, incorporating allometric scaling, lean body weight, and machine learning techniques, yet require further external validation. The results highlight ongoing challenges in achieving universal applicability of TCI models, underscoring the need for future research in refining precision dosing and personalized anesthesia management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Systems","volume":"49 1","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12034585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-025-02187-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a systematic review conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, evaluating pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) models for target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol. A structured search was performed across PubMed, Summon, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus, identifying 427 sources, of which 17 met the inclusion criteria. The analysis revealed that nine studies compared existing models, six focused on the development of new PK-PD models, and two explored broader implications of TCI in anesthesia. Comparative studies indicate that while the Eleveld model generally offers superior predictive accuracy, it does not consistently outperform the Marsh and Schnider models across all populations. The Schnider model demonstrated better bias control in elderly patients, while the Eleveld model improved drug clearance estimation in obese patients. However, inconsistencies remain in predicting brain concentrations of propofol. Newly proposed models introduce adaptive dosing strategies, incorporating allometric scaling, lean body weight, and machine learning techniques, yet require further external validation. The results highlight ongoing challenges in achieving universal applicability of TCI models, underscoring the need for future research in refining precision dosing and personalized anesthesia management.

靶控输注异丙酚:近期研究结果的系统回顾。
本研究根据PRISMA 2020指南进行了系统综述,评估了异丙酚靶控输注(TCI)的药代动力学-药效学(PK-PD)模型。通过PubMed、Summon、b谷歌Scholar、Web of Science和Scopus进行结构化搜索,确定了427个来源,其中17个符合纳入标准。分析显示,9项研究比较了现有模型,6项研究侧重于开发新的PK-PD模型,2项研究探讨了TCI在麻醉中的更广泛意义。比较研究表明,虽然Eleveld模型通常具有更高的预测准确性,但在所有人群中,它的表现并不总是优于Marsh和schneider模型。施耐德模型在老年患者中显示出更好的偏倚控制,而Eleveld模型改善了肥胖患者的药物清除率估计。然而,在预测异丙酚的大脑浓度方面仍然存在不一致性。新提出的模型引入了自适应给药策略,结合异速缩放、瘦体重和机器学习技术,但需要进一步的外部验证。研究结果强调了在实现TCI模型的普遍适用性方面面临的挑战,强调了在改进精确给药和个性化麻醉管理方面的未来研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Systems
Journal of Medical Systems 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
83
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Systems provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of the increasingly extensive applications of new systems techniques and methods in hospital clinic and physician''s office administration; pathology radiology and pharmaceutical delivery systems; medical records storage and retrieval; and ancillary patient-support systems. The journal publishes informative articles essays and studies across the entire scale of medical systems from large hospital programs to novel small-scale medical services. Education is an integral part of this amalgamation of sciences and selected articles are published in this area. Since existing medical systems are constantly being modified to fit particular circumstances and to solve specific problems the journal includes a special section devoted to status reports on current installations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信