Calcimimetic Prescriptions in Fee-for-Service Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Dialysis.

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jillian S Caldwell, Xingxing S Cheng, Eran Bendavid, Glenn M Chertow, Darius N Lakdawalla, Eugene Lin
{"title":"Calcimimetic Prescriptions in Fee-for-Service Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Dialysis.","authors":"Jillian S Caldwell, Xingxing S Cheng, Eran Bendavid, Glenn M Chertow, Darius N Lakdawalla, Eugene Lin","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Calcimimetics are a mainstay of treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT), a ubiquitous condition in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) associated with fractures, cardiovascular events, and mortality. In 2018, Medicare implemented the Transitional Drug Add-On Payment Adjustment (TDAPA), which shifted calcimimetic coverage from Part D prescription drug plans to Part B. Prior to TDAPA, Medicare beneficiaries with ESKD faced varying out-of-pocket costs for calcimimetics at the point of pharmacy depending on presence and magnitude of low-income subsidies (LISs). TDAPA differentially alleviated barriers to filling these costly medications.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether calcimimetic prescriptions increased post-TDAPA among patients subject to high out-of-pocket costs prior to the policy change (patients with Part D coverage without LIS and those lacking Part D coverage).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In this longitudinal cohort study, a difference-in-differences analysis was performed at the patient-quarter level. The sample included adult Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries undergoing maintenance dialysis between July 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020, at US outpatient dialysis facilities. The US Renal Data System, a national registry of patients with ESKD, was used to collect patient, facility, and claims data. The data analysis occurred between May 2023 and October 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>LIS extent for patients with Part D coverage (fully subsidized, partially subsidized, not subsidized); presence of Medicare Part D coverage; and whether the patient-quarter was before/after TDAPA implementation.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The main outcome was having 1 or more filled calcimimetic prescriptions per quarter of the study period. A linear regression model was estimated, adjusting for demographics, dialysis modality and access, comorbidities, and facility characteristics, with 2-way fixed effects at the patient and quarter level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 509 765 adult Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries were included in the analysis. The cohort had a mean (SD) age of 64 (14) years, was 57% male, 4% Asian, 38% Black, 15% Hispanic, 41% non-Hispanic White, and 3% other race and ethnicity. In adjusted difference-in-differences models, TDAPA's estimated effect was an absolute increase of 9.8 percentage points (pp) (95% CI, 9.3-10.2 pp) in calcimimetic prescriptions for patients with Part D but no subsidy and a 2.2 pp (95% CI, 1.8-2.6 pp) increase for patients with partial LIS compared to patients with full LIS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The results of this longitudinal cohort study showed that after transitioning calcimimetic coverage from Part D to Part B via TDAPA, calcimimetic prescriptions increased in a graded manner, with the largest increases experienced by patients previously subject to the highest out-of-pocket prescription drug costs. Medicare's TDAPA policy has the potential to expand access to medications for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 4","pages":"e250452"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12008760/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Calcimimetics are a mainstay of treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT), a ubiquitous condition in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) associated with fractures, cardiovascular events, and mortality. In 2018, Medicare implemented the Transitional Drug Add-On Payment Adjustment (TDAPA), which shifted calcimimetic coverage from Part D prescription drug plans to Part B. Prior to TDAPA, Medicare beneficiaries with ESKD faced varying out-of-pocket costs for calcimimetics at the point of pharmacy depending on presence and magnitude of low-income subsidies (LISs). TDAPA differentially alleviated barriers to filling these costly medications.

Objective: To assess whether calcimimetic prescriptions increased post-TDAPA among patients subject to high out-of-pocket costs prior to the policy change (patients with Part D coverage without LIS and those lacking Part D coverage).

Design, setting, and participants: In this longitudinal cohort study, a difference-in-differences analysis was performed at the patient-quarter level. The sample included adult Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries undergoing maintenance dialysis between July 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020, at US outpatient dialysis facilities. The US Renal Data System, a national registry of patients with ESKD, was used to collect patient, facility, and claims data. The data analysis occurred between May 2023 and October 2024.

Exposures: LIS extent for patients with Part D coverage (fully subsidized, partially subsidized, not subsidized); presence of Medicare Part D coverage; and whether the patient-quarter was before/after TDAPA implementation.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome was having 1 or more filled calcimimetic prescriptions per quarter of the study period. A linear regression model was estimated, adjusting for demographics, dialysis modality and access, comorbidities, and facility characteristics, with 2-way fixed effects at the patient and quarter level.

Results: A total of 509 765 adult Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries were included in the analysis. The cohort had a mean (SD) age of 64 (14) years, was 57% male, 4% Asian, 38% Black, 15% Hispanic, 41% non-Hispanic White, and 3% other race and ethnicity. In adjusted difference-in-differences models, TDAPA's estimated effect was an absolute increase of 9.8 percentage points (pp) (95% CI, 9.3-10.2 pp) in calcimimetic prescriptions for patients with Part D but no subsidy and a 2.2 pp (95% CI, 1.8-2.6 pp) increase for patients with partial LIS compared to patients with full LIS.

Conclusions and relevance: The results of this longitudinal cohort study showed that after transitioning calcimimetic coverage from Part D to Part B via TDAPA, calcimimetic prescriptions increased in a graded manner, with the largest increases experienced by patients previously subject to the highest out-of-pocket prescription drug costs. Medicare's TDAPA policy has the potential to expand access to medications for patients.

在接受透析的按服务收费的医疗保险受益人中的拟钙剂处方。
重要性:钙化剂是治疗继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进(sHPT)的主要药物,sHPT是终末期肾病(ESKD)中普遍存在的一种与骨折、心血管事件和死亡率相关的疾病。2018年,医疗保险实施了过渡性药物附加支付调整(TDAPA),将钙化剂的覆盖范围从D部分处方药计划转移到b部分。在TDAPA之前,ESKD的医疗保险受益人在药房处面临不同的自付费用,这取决于低收入补贴(LISs)的存在和规模。TDAPA以不同的方式减轻了填补这些昂贵药物的障碍。目的:评估拟钙化剂处方是否增加了政策变化前自费高的患者(没有LIS的D部分覆盖的患者和缺乏D部分覆盖的患者)的tdapa后。设计、环境和参与者:在这项纵向队列研究中,在患者- 1 / 4的水平上进行了差异中差异分析。样本包括2016年7月1日至2020年12月31日期间在美国门诊透析设施接受维持性透析的成年医疗保险服务收费受益人。美国肾脏数据系统是ESKD患者的国家登记系统,用于收集患者、设施和索赔数据。数据分析发生在2023年5月至2024年10月之间。暴露:D部分覆盖患者的LIS程度(全额补贴,部分补贴,未补贴);医疗保险D部分覆盖;以及患者季度是在TDAPA实施之前还是之后。主要结果和措施:主要结果是每四分之一的研究期间有1个或更多的补钙剂处方。估计了一个线性回归模型,调整了人口统计学、透析方式和途径、合并症和设施特征,在患者和季度水平上具有双向固定效应。结果:509 765名成人医疗保险按服务收费受益人被纳入分析。该队列的平均(SD)年龄为64(14)岁,男性占57%,亚洲人占4%,黑人占38%,西班牙裔占15%,非西班牙裔白人占41%,其他种族和民族占3%。在调整后的差中差模型中,TDAPA的估计效果是,与完全LIS患者相比,在D部分患者但没有补贴的拟钙化处方中,TDAPA的绝对效果增加了9.8个百分点(95% CI, 9.3-10.2 pp),部分LIS患者的效果增加了2.2个百分点(95% CI, 1.8-2.6 pp)。结论和相关性:这项纵向队列研究的结果显示,通过TDAPA将拟钙化剂覆盖范围从D部分过渡到B部分后,拟钙化剂处方呈分级增加,其中最大的增加是以前需要支付最高自付处方药费用的患者。医疗保险的TDAPA政策有可能扩大患者获得药物的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信