A framework for establishing shared, task-oriented understanding in hybrid open multi-agent systems.

IF 3 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-04-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frai.2025.1440582
Nikolaos Kondylidis, Ilaria Tiddi, Annette Ten Teije
{"title":"A framework for establishing shared, task-oriented understanding in hybrid open multi-agent systems.","authors":"Nikolaos Kondylidis, Ilaria Tiddi, Annette Ten Teije","doi":"10.3389/frai.2025.1440582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Open Multi-Agent Systems (OMAS), the open nature of such systems precludes that all communication protocols are hardwired in advance. It is therefore essential that agents can incrementally learn to understand each other. Ideally, this is done with a minimal number of a priori assumptions, in order not to compromise the open nature of the system. This challenge becomes even harder for hybrid (human-artificial agent) populations. In such a hybrid setting, the challenge of learning to communicate is exacerbated by the requirement to do this in a minimal number of interactions with the humans involved. The difficulty arises from the conflict between making a minimal number of assumptions while also minimizing the number of interactions required. This study provides a fine-grained analysis of the process of establishing a shared task-oriented understanding for OMAS, with a particular focus on hybrid populations, i.e., containing both human and artificial agents. We present a framework that describes this process of reaching a shared task-oriented understanding. Our framework defines components that reflect decisions the agent designer needs to make, and we show how these components are affected when the agent population includes humans, i.e., when moving to a hybrid setting. The contribution of this paper is not to define yet another method for agents that learn to communicate. Instead, our goal is to provide a framework to assist researchers in designing agents that need to interact with humans in unforeseen scenarios. We validate our framework by showing that it provides a uniform way to analyze a diverse set of existing approaches from the literature for establishing shared understanding between agents. Our analysis reveals limitations of these existing approaches if they were to be applied in hybrid populations, and suggests how these can be resolved.</p>","PeriodicalId":33315,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","volume":"8 ","pages":"1440582"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12041212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1440582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Open Multi-Agent Systems (OMAS), the open nature of such systems precludes that all communication protocols are hardwired in advance. It is therefore essential that agents can incrementally learn to understand each other. Ideally, this is done with a minimal number of a priori assumptions, in order not to compromise the open nature of the system. This challenge becomes even harder for hybrid (human-artificial agent) populations. In such a hybrid setting, the challenge of learning to communicate is exacerbated by the requirement to do this in a minimal number of interactions with the humans involved. The difficulty arises from the conflict between making a minimal number of assumptions while also minimizing the number of interactions required. This study provides a fine-grained analysis of the process of establishing a shared task-oriented understanding for OMAS, with a particular focus on hybrid populations, i.e., containing both human and artificial agents. We present a framework that describes this process of reaching a shared task-oriented understanding. Our framework defines components that reflect decisions the agent designer needs to make, and we show how these components are affected when the agent population includes humans, i.e., when moving to a hybrid setting. The contribution of this paper is not to define yet another method for agents that learn to communicate. Instead, our goal is to provide a framework to assist researchers in designing agents that need to interact with humans in unforeseen scenarios. We validate our framework by showing that it provides a uniform way to analyze a diverse set of existing approaches from the literature for establishing shared understanding between agents. Our analysis reveals limitations of these existing approaches if they were to be applied in hybrid populations, and suggests how these can be resolved.

在混合开放多智能体系统中建立共享的、面向任务的理解的框架。
在开放多代理系统(OMAS)中,这种系统的开放性排除了所有通信协议预先硬连接的可能性。因此,智能体能够逐渐学会相互理解是至关重要的。理想情况下,这是用最少数量的先验假设来完成的,以便不损害系统的开放性。这一挑战对于混合种群(人类-人工代理)来说更加困难。在这样一个混合的环境中,学习沟通的挑战被要求在与所涉及的人进行最少的互动中完成这一任务而加剧。困难来自于做出最少数量的假设和最小化所需的交互数量之间的冲突。本研究提供了对建立面向共享任务的OMAS理解过程的细粒度分析,特别关注混合种群,即包含人类和人工代理。我们提出了一个框架,描述了达成面向任务的共享理解的过程。我们的框架定义了反映代理设计者需要做出的决策的组件,并且我们展示了当代理人口包括人类时,即当移动到混合设置时,这些组件是如何受到影响的。本文的贡献不是为学习通信的代理定义另一种方法。相反,我们的目标是提供一个框架,以帮助研究人员设计在不可预见的情况下需要与人类互动的代理。我们通过展示它提供了一种统一的方法来分析来自文献的各种现有方法,以在代理之间建立共享理解,从而验证了我们的框架。我们的分析揭示了这些现有方法的局限性,如果它们应用于杂交种群,并建议如何解决这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
272
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信