Isabel Cohen, Raven Relerford, Charles Olvera, Vanessa Ramirez-Zohfeld, Amber Miller-Winder, Lee A Lindquist
{"title":"What Changed Your Mind? Influencers of Older Adults Changing Decisions About Aging-In-Place Versus Long-Term Care.","authors":"Isabel Cohen, Raven Relerford, Charles Olvera, Vanessa Ramirez-Zohfeld, Amber Miller-Winder, Lee A Lindquist","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As individuals experience age-related changes, such as cognitive decline or hospitalizations, their ability to live independently at home may be impacted. Decision-making and planning are essential in order to support successful aging-in-place (AIP), which is defined as continuing to live in one's home and community. Despite making plans at one single time-point, prior research has demonstrated that decision-making among older adults is not stagnant.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The objective of this qualitative study was to understand what influences older adults to change their plans about AIP versus living in long-term care (LTC) settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed a subset of the PlanYourLifespan study subjects (a longitudinal cohort study of community dwelling older adults) who have shown a fluctuation in their AIP/LTC decisions over a 6-month period and surveyed what influenced their decisions to change. Decisions related to support needed in the case of a hospitalization and Alzheimer's disease/memory loss (rehabilitation preferences, caregiver support, living preferences, and LTC facilities) were assessed. Three investigators individually coded open-ended survey responses to identify emerging themes using constant comparative analysis with triangulation of themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 293 PYL study subjects, 134 expressed a change to at least one of their decisions. Through a qualitative analysis of survey responses, five overarching themes emerged that influenced fluctuating decision-making: (1) personal health experience, (2) health experience of a loved one, (3) increased contemplation, (4) social support network influences, and (5) denying change.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study was the first to examine the factors that influence fluctuating AIP/LTC decision-making among older adults. The key influencers identified highlight the importance of ongoing discussions to revisit AIP/LTC planning in the case of changing or unexpected life events. Having a strong understanding of what influences seniors in their AIP/LTC decision-making processes will enable us to include these factors and people in decision-making discussions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: As individuals experience age-related changes, such as cognitive decline or hospitalizations, their ability to live independently at home may be impacted. Decision-making and planning are essential in order to support successful aging-in-place (AIP), which is defined as continuing to live in one's home and community. Despite making plans at one single time-point, prior research has demonstrated that decision-making among older adults is not stagnant.
Aims: The objective of this qualitative study was to understand what influences older adults to change their plans about AIP versus living in long-term care (LTC) settings.
Methods: We analyzed a subset of the PlanYourLifespan study subjects (a longitudinal cohort study of community dwelling older adults) who have shown a fluctuation in their AIP/LTC decisions over a 6-month period and surveyed what influenced their decisions to change. Decisions related to support needed in the case of a hospitalization and Alzheimer's disease/memory loss (rehabilitation preferences, caregiver support, living preferences, and LTC facilities) were assessed. Three investigators individually coded open-ended survey responses to identify emerging themes using constant comparative analysis with triangulation of themes.
Results: Of the 293 PYL study subjects, 134 expressed a change to at least one of their decisions. Through a qualitative analysis of survey responses, five overarching themes emerged that influenced fluctuating decision-making: (1) personal health experience, (2) health experience of a loved one, (3) increased contemplation, (4) social support network influences, and (5) denying change.
Discussion: This study was the first to examine the factors that influence fluctuating AIP/LTC decision-making among older adults. The key influencers identified highlight the importance of ongoing discussions to revisit AIP/LTC planning in the case of changing or unexpected life events. Having a strong understanding of what influences seniors in their AIP/LTC decision-making processes will enable us to include these factors and people in decision-making discussions.