CoCare-CI: A Clinical Innovation to Address Behavioral Symptoms in Hospitalized Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment.

David H Lynch, Elizabeth R Houston, Anna L Andrews, Kimberly J Mournighan, Willow F Butler, John A Batsis, Joshua D Niznik, Jennifer Leeman, Laura C Hanson
{"title":"CoCare-CI: A Clinical Innovation to Address Behavioral Symptoms in Hospitalized Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment.","authors":"David H Lynch, Elizabeth R Houston, Anna L Andrews, Kimberly J Mournighan, Willow F Butler, John A Batsis, Joshua D Niznik, Jennifer Leeman, Laura C Hanson","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Behavioral symptoms in hospitalized older adults with cognitive impairment often lead to physical and chemical restraint use, despite associated harms. Patient-centered care models show promise in reducing restraint use but are rarely implemented in routine practice. This project implemented CoCare-CI, a clinical innovation to address behavioral symptoms in hospitalized older adults with cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CoCare-CI was implemented on a 24-bed ACE unit in a 128-bed community hospital from January 2023 to August 2024 by a multidisciplinary team led by a geriatric nurse practitioner (GNP). CoCare-CI emphasized (1) systematic screening and assessment of mentation, and (2) individualized management plans for delirium or dementia. Implementation followed a phased, cyclical approach with champions supporting process improvement. Baseline restraint data (January-August 2023) were compared to intervention data (September 2023-August 2024). Primary outcomes included physical and chemical restraint use; process measures included documentation rates of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), CAM-Severity (CAM-S), Six-Item Cognitive Impairment Test (6CIT), and 4Ms checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 949 patients (mean age 81.5 years, 59% female, 80.6% White), 34.1% had cognitive impairment at baseline, including 22.6% with dementia and 11.5% with a significant 6CIT score (≥ 8). Documentation rates improved for CAM (68%-86%), CAM-S (0%-79%), 6CIT (0%-89%), and 4Ms checklist (0%-96%). Physical restraint use decreased from 4.3% to 0.7%, and chemical restraint use dropped from 7.6% to 2.3%. Most restraint use (84.2%, 16/19) was deemed potentially avoidable, with root cause analysis revealing that 78.6% (11/14) of patients with restraint orders had moderate to severe dementia with behavioral symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CoCare-CI is associated with reductions in reduced physical and chemical restraint use, demonstrating potential for dissemination within routine clinical practice. Future research should assess sustainability, broader applicability, and integration of additional 4Ms components.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Behavioral symptoms in hospitalized older adults with cognitive impairment often lead to physical and chemical restraint use, despite associated harms. Patient-centered care models show promise in reducing restraint use but are rarely implemented in routine practice. This project implemented CoCare-CI, a clinical innovation to address behavioral symptoms in hospitalized older adults with cognitive impairment.

Methods: CoCare-CI was implemented on a 24-bed ACE unit in a 128-bed community hospital from January 2023 to August 2024 by a multidisciplinary team led by a geriatric nurse practitioner (GNP). CoCare-CI emphasized (1) systematic screening and assessment of mentation, and (2) individualized management plans for delirium or dementia. Implementation followed a phased, cyclical approach with champions supporting process improvement. Baseline restraint data (January-August 2023) were compared to intervention data (September 2023-August 2024). Primary outcomes included physical and chemical restraint use; process measures included documentation rates of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), CAM-Severity (CAM-S), Six-Item Cognitive Impairment Test (6CIT), and 4Ms checklist.

Results: Among 949 patients (mean age 81.5 years, 59% female, 80.6% White), 34.1% had cognitive impairment at baseline, including 22.6% with dementia and 11.5% with a significant 6CIT score (≥ 8). Documentation rates improved for CAM (68%-86%), CAM-S (0%-79%), 6CIT (0%-89%), and 4Ms checklist (0%-96%). Physical restraint use decreased from 4.3% to 0.7%, and chemical restraint use dropped from 7.6% to 2.3%. Most restraint use (84.2%, 16/19) was deemed potentially avoidable, with root cause analysis revealing that 78.6% (11/14) of patients with restraint orders had moderate to severe dementia with behavioral symptoms.

Conclusions: CoCare-CI is associated with reductions in reduced physical and chemical restraint use, demonstrating potential for dissemination within routine clinical practice. Future research should assess sustainability, broader applicability, and integration of additional 4Ms components.

CoCare-CI:治疗住院老年认知障碍患者行为症状的临床创新
导言:住院的认知障碍老年人的行为症状常常导致使用物理和化学约束,尽管存在相关危害。以患者为中心的护理模式显示出减少约束使用的希望,但很少在日常实践中实施。该项目实施了CoCare-CI,这是一项临床创新,旨在解决住院的认知障碍老年人的行为症状。方法:CoCare-CI于2023年1月至2024年8月在一家拥有128个床位的社区医院的24个床位的ACE单元实施,由一名老年执业护士(GNP)领导的多学科团队实施。CoCare-CI强调(1)系统筛查和评估精神状态,(2)谵妄或痴呆的个性化管理计划。实现遵循一个分阶段的、循环的方法,支持过程改进。将基线约束数据(2023年1月至8月)与干预数据(2023年9月至2024年8月)进行比较。主要结局包括物理和化学约束的使用;过程测量包括混淆评估法(CAM)、CAM-严重性(CAM- s)、六项认知障碍测试(6CIT)和4Ms检查表的记录率。结果:949例患者(平均年龄81.5岁,女性59%,白人80.6%)中,34.1%基线时存在认知障碍,其中22.6%为痴呆,11.5%为显著性6CIT评分(≥8)。CAM(68%-86%)、CAM- s(0%-79%)、6CIT(0%-89%)和4m检查表(0%-96%)的文档化率得到了提高。物理约束的使用从4.3%下降到0.7%,化学约束的使用从7.6%下降到2.3%。大多数约束使用(84.2%,16/19)被认为是可以避免的,根本原因分析显示78.6%(11/14)的约束令患者患有中度至重度痴呆并伴有行为症状。结论:CoCare-CI与减少物理和化学约束的使用有关,显示出在常规临床实践中推广的潜力。未来的研究应评估可持续性,更广泛的适用性,以及额外的4Ms组件的集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信