Concurrent pathological scar: independent risk factor for esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Yue-Yi Zhang, Zhi-Yu Yan, Qing-Wei Jiang, Yun-Lu Feng, Ying-Yun Yang, Sheng-Yu Zhang, Dong-Sheng Wu, Tao Guo, Xi Wu, Qiang Wang, Ai-Ming Yang
{"title":"Concurrent pathological scar: independent risk factor for esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection.","authors":"Yue-Yi Zhang, Zhi-Yu Yan, Qing-Wei Jiang, Yun-Lu Feng, Ying-Yun Yang, Sheng-Yu Zhang, Dong-Sheng Wu, Tao Guo, Xi Wu, Qiang Wang, Ai-Ming Yang","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11762-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Esophageal stricture is a common complication after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Pathological scars may predict stricture development, but clinical studies exploring their relationship are limited. This study aimed to investigate the link between concurrent pathological scarring and post-ESD esophageal stricture and develop a predictive risk model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included patients who underwent ESD for superficial esophageal lesions (SELs) over the past decade. Data on demographics, endoscopy, pathology, and concurrent scarring were collected. Multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors, followed by validation using subgroup analysis and propensity score matching. A nomogram was developed and internally validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 255 patients, 28 (11.0%) developed esophageal stricture. Multivariate logistic regression identified concurrent pathological scarring as an independent risk factor for stricture development (OR 96.520 [10.641-875.536], p < 0.001). Additional risk factors included lesions in the upper esophagus, lesions longer than 4 cm, circumferential involvement over 50%, infiltration depth beyond the epithelium, and muscular layer injury during the procedure. A predictive model incorporating these factors was developed, demonstrating high discriminative ability (AUC 0.943 [0.902-0.984]) with an optimal cutoff of 135.6, sensitivity of 82.4%, and specificity of 94.3%. The calibration curve showed good accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Concurrent pathological scarring is an independent risk factor for post-ESD esophageal stricture.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"3848-3859"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11762-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Esophageal stricture is a common complication after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Pathological scars may predict stricture development, but clinical studies exploring their relationship are limited. This study aimed to investigate the link between concurrent pathological scarring and post-ESD esophageal stricture and develop a predictive risk model.

Methods: This retrospective single-center study included patients who underwent ESD for superficial esophageal lesions (SELs) over the past decade. Data on demographics, endoscopy, pathology, and concurrent scarring were collected. Multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors, followed by validation using subgroup analysis and propensity score matching. A nomogram was developed and internally validated.

Results: Of 255 patients, 28 (11.0%) developed esophageal stricture. Multivariate logistic regression identified concurrent pathological scarring as an independent risk factor for stricture development (OR 96.520 [10.641-875.536], p < 0.001). Additional risk factors included lesions in the upper esophagus, lesions longer than 4 cm, circumferential involvement over 50%, infiltration depth beyond the epithelium, and muscular layer injury during the procedure. A predictive model incorporating these factors was developed, demonstrating high discriminative ability (AUC 0.943 [0.902-0.984]) with an optimal cutoff of 135.6, sensitivity of 82.4%, and specificity of 94.3%. The calibration curve showed good accuracy.

Conclusions: Concurrent pathological scarring is an independent risk factor for post-ESD esophageal stricture.

并发病理性瘢痕:内镜下粘膜剥离后食管狭窄的独立危险因素。
背景与目的:食管狭窄是食管内镜下粘膜下剥离(ESD)术后常见的并发症。病理性疤痕可以预测狭窄的发展,但临床研究探索其关系是有限的。本研究旨在探讨并发病理性瘢痕形成与esd后食管狭窄的关系,并建立预测风险模型。方法:本回顾性单中心研究纳入了过去十年中因浅表性食管病变(sel)接受ESD治疗的患者。收集了人口统计学、内窥镜检查、病理和并发疤痕的数据。多变量逻辑回归确定了危险因素,随后使用亚组分析和倾向评分匹配进行验证。开发并内部验证了nomogram。结果:255例患者中,28例(11.0%)发生食管狭窄。多因素logistic回归发现并发病理性瘢痕形成是食管狭窄发生的独立危险因素(OR 96.520 [10.641-875.536], p结论:并发病理性瘢痕形成是esd后食管狭窄发生的独立危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信