Master protocol for a series of cohort-based randomized controlled trials to test tools to communicate research results to study participants and others with relevant lived experience: the SPIN-CLEAR Trials.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2025-05-08 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-08846-2
Brett D Thombs, Claire Adams, Elsa-Lynn Nassar, Marie-Eve Carrier, Meira Golberg, Kanika Bharthi, Amanda Wurz, Annabelle South, Linda Kwakkenbos, Sabrina Hoa, Danielle B Rice, Geneviève Guillot, Amanda Lawrie-Jones, Maureen Sauvé, Susan J Bartlett, Catherine Fortune, Amy Gietzen, Karen Gottesman, Marie Hudson, Laura K Hummers, Vanessa L Malcarne, Maureen D Mayes, Michelle Richard, James Stempel, Robyn K Wojeck, Kathleen Blagrave, Jill T Boruff, Vanessa Cook, Nicole Culos-Reed, Ole Fröbert, Katie Gillies, Vera Granikov, Lars G Hemkens, Elizabeth Yakes Jimenez, Agnes Kocher, Catarina Leite, Mathew A W T Lim, Nancy Maltez, John Michalski, Tracy Mieszczak, Mwidimi Ndosi, Janet Pope, François Rannou, Ken Rozee, Sharon E Straus, Matthew R Sydes, Lehana Thabane, John Varga, Tami Yap, Merrick Zwarenstein, Luc Mouthon, Andrea Benedetti
{"title":"Master protocol for a series of cohort-based randomized controlled trials to test tools to communicate research results to study participants and others with relevant lived experience: the SPIN-CLEAR Trials.","authors":"Brett D Thombs, Claire Adams, Elsa-Lynn Nassar, Marie-Eve Carrier, Meira Golberg, Kanika Bharthi, Amanda Wurz, Annabelle South, Linda Kwakkenbos, Sabrina Hoa, Danielle B Rice, Geneviève Guillot, Amanda Lawrie-Jones, Maureen Sauvé, Susan J Bartlett, Catherine Fortune, Amy Gietzen, Karen Gottesman, Marie Hudson, Laura K Hummers, Vanessa L Malcarne, Maureen D Mayes, Michelle Richard, James Stempel, Robyn K Wojeck, Kathleen Blagrave, Jill T Boruff, Vanessa Cook, Nicole Culos-Reed, Ole Fröbert, Katie Gillies, Vera Granikov, Lars G Hemkens, Elizabeth Yakes Jimenez, Agnes Kocher, Catarina Leite, Mathew A W T Lim, Nancy Maltez, John Michalski, Tracy Mieszczak, Mwidimi Ndosi, Janet Pope, François Rannou, Ken Rozee, Sharon E Straus, Matthew R Sydes, Lehana Thabane, John Varga, Tami Yap, Merrick Zwarenstein, Luc Mouthon, Andrea Benedetti","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-08846-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research results are often not communicated to study participants or others with relevant lived experience. Effective communication of research results would help study participants understand their contribution to research and could improve trust in research and likelihood of research participation. Few randomized controlled trials (RCTs), however, have compared the effectiveness of research communication tools, and it is not known which tools work best for different people. We will conduct the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network-Communicating Latest Evidence and Results (SPIN-CLEAR) trial series via the multi-national SPIN Cohort to compare tool effectiveness. Primary objectives of each RCT will be to compare tools based on (1) information completeness, (2) understandability, and (3) ease of use. We will additionally evaluate comprehension of key aspects of disseminated research; likelihood that participants would enroll in a similar future study; and, for all primary and secondary outcomes, outcomes by participant characteristics (gender, age, race or ethnicity, country, language, education level, health literacy).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An advisory team of people with systemic sclerosis (SSc, also known as scleroderma) participated in developing research questions, selecting outcomes, and designing the series of parallel-arm RCTs that will each compare two or more tools or tool variations to a plain-language summary comparator; the common comparator will facilitate across-trial comparisons. In each RCT, people with SSc and researchers will select a recent SSc research study to disseminate. Tools will be developed by experienced tool developers and people with SSc. SPIN Cohort participants (current N eligible = 1522 from 50 SPIN sites in Australia, Canada, France, UK, USA) and additional participants recruited via social media and patient organization partners who consent to participate will be randomized to a dissemination tool or plain-language summary comparator and complete outcomes. Analyses will be intent-to-treat and use linear regression models.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Each trial in the planned series of trials will build upon knowledge from previous trials. Results will contribute to the evidence base on how to best disseminate results to study participants and others with relevant lived experience.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06373263. Registered on April 17, 2024 (first trial in series).</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12060389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08846-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research results are often not communicated to study participants or others with relevant lived experience. Effective communication of research results would help study participants understand their contribution to research and could improve trust in research and likelihood of research participation. Few randomized controlled trials (RCTs), however, have compared the effectiveness of research communication tools, and it is not known which tools work best for different people. We will conduct the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network-Communicating Latest Evidence and Results (SPIN-CLEAR) trial series via the multi-national SPIN Cohort to compare tool effectiveness. Primary objectives of each RCT will be to compare tools based on (1) information completeness, (2) understandability, and (3) ease of use. We will additionally evaluate comprehension of key aspects of disseminated research; likelihood that participants would enroll in a similar future study; and, for all primary and secondary outcomes, outcomes by participant characteristics (gender, age, race or ethnicity, country, language, education level, health literacy).

Methods: An advisory team of people with systemic sclerosis (SSc, also known as scleroderma) participated in developing research questions, selecting outcomes, and designing the series of parallel-arm RCTs that will each compare two or more tools or tool variations to a plain-language summary comparator; the common comparator will facilitate across-trial comparisons. In each RCT, people with SSc and researchers will select a recent SSc research study to disseminate. Tools will be developed by experienced tool developers and people with SSc. SPIN Cohort participants (current N eligible = 1522 from 50 SPIN sites in Australia, Canada, France, UK, USA) and additional participants recruited via social media and patient organization partners who consent to participate will be randomized to a dissemination tool or plain-language summary comparator and complete outcomes. Analyses will be intent-to-treat and use linear regression models.

Discussion: Each trial in the planned series of trials will build upon knowledge from previous trials. Results will contribute to the evidence base on how to best disseminate results to study participants and others with relevant lived experience.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06373263. Registered on April 17, 2024 (first trial in series).

一系列基于队列的随机对照试验的主协议,以测试向研究参与者和其他具有相关生活经验的人传达研究结果的工具:SPIN-CLEAR试验。
背景:研究结果往往没有传达给研究参与者或其他相关的生活经验。研究结果的有效沟通将有助于研究参与者了解他们对研究的贡献,并可以提高对研究的信任和参与研究的可能性。然而,很少有随机对照试验(RCTs)比较了研究交流工具的有效性,也不知道哪种工具对不同的人最有效。我们将通过多国SPIN队列进行以硬皮病患者为中心的干预网络-交流最新证据和结果(SPIN- clear)试验系列,以比较工具的有效性。每个RCT的主要目标是基于(1)信息完整性、(2)可理解性和(3)易用性来比较工具。我们还将评估对传播研究关键方面的理解;参与者将来参加类似研究的可能性;对于所有主要和次要结果,按参与者特征(性别、年龄、种族或民族、国家、语言、教育水平、卫生素养)划分的结果。方法:由系统性硬化症(SSc,也称为硬皮病)患者组成的咨询团队参与制定研究问题、选择结果和设计一系列平行对照试验,每个对照试验将两种或多种工具或工具变体与简单语言总结比较器进行比较;共同比较器将有助于跨试验比较。在每个随机对照试验中,SSc患者和研究人员将选择最近的SSc研究研究进行传播。工具将由经验丰富的工具开发人员和SSc人员开发。SPIN队列参与者(目前N名符合条件= 1522人,来自澳大利亚、加拿大、法国、英国和美国的50个SPIN站点)以及通过社交媒体和同意参与的患者组织合作伙伴招募的其他参与者将随机分配到传播工具或简单语言总结比较器和完整结果。分析将有意处理和使用线性回归模型。讨论:计划系列试验中的每个试验将建立在以前试验的知识基础上。研究结果将为如何最好地向研究参与者和其他有相关生活经验的人传播结果提供证据基础。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06373263。2024年4月17日注册(系列首次试验)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信