Evaluating fracture volume loss during production process by comparative analysis of initial and second flowback data.

IF 6.9 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Chong Cao, Tamer Moussa, Hassan Dehghanpour
{"title":"Evaluating fracture volume loss during production process by comparative analysis of initial and second flowback data.","authors":"Chong Cao, Tamer Moussa, Hassan Dehghanpour","doi":"10.1007/s40789-025-00754-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The fracture volume is gradually changed with the depletion of fracture pressure during the production process. However, there are few flowback models available so far that can estimate the fracture volume loss using pressure transient and rate transient data. The initial flowback involves producing back the fracturing fluid after hydraulic fracturing, while the second flowback involves producing back the preloading fluid injected into the parent wells before fracturing of child wells. The main objective of this research is to compare the initial and second flowback data to capture the changes in fracture volume after production and preload processes. Such a comparison is useful for evaluating well performance and optimizing fracturing operations. We construct rate-normalized pressure (RNP) versus material balance time (MBT) diagnostic plots using both initial and second flowback data (FB<sub>i</sub> and FB<sub>s</sub>, respectively) of six multi-fractured horizontal wells completed in Niobrara and Codell formations in DJ Basin. In general, the slope of RNP plot during the FB<sub>s</sub> period is higher than that during the FB<sub>i</sub> period, indicating a potential loss of fracture volume from the FB<sub>i</sub> to the FB<sub>s</sub> period. We estimate the changes in effective fracture volume (<i>V</i> <sub>ef</sub>) by analyzing the changes in the RNP slope and total compressibility between these two flowback periods. <i>V</i> <sub>ef</sub> during FB<sub>s</sub> is in general 3%-45% lower than that during FB<sub>i</sub>. We also compare the drive mechanisms for the two flowback periods by calculating the compaction-drive index (CDI), hydrocarbon-drive index (HDI), and water-drive index (WDI). The dominant drive mechanism during both flowback periods is CDI, but its contribution is reduced by 16% in the FB<sub>s</sub> period. This drop is generally compensated by a relatively higher HDI during this period. The loss of effective fracture volume might be attributed to the pressure depletion in fractures, which occurs during the production period and can extend 800 days.</p>","PeriodicalId":53469,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Coal Science & Technology","volume":"12 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12041020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Coal Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-025-00754-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fracture volume is gradually changed with the depletion of fracture pressure during the production process. However, there are few flowback models available so far that can estimate the fracture volume loss using pressure transient and rate transient data. The initial flowback involves producing back the fracturing fluid after hydraulic fracturing, while the second flowback involves producing back the preloading fluid injected into the parent wells before fracturing of child wells. The main objective of this research is to compare the initial and second flowback data to capture the changes in fracture volume after production and preload processes. Such a comparison is useful for evaluating well performance and optimizing fracturing operations. We construct rate-normalized pressure (RNP) versus material balance time (MBT) diagnostic plots using both initial and second flowback data (FBi and FBs, respectively) of six multi-fractured horizontal wells completed in Niobrara and Codell formations in DJ Basin. In general, the slope of RNP plot during the FBs period is higher than that during the FBi period, indicating a potential loss of fracture volume from the FBi to the FBs period. We estimate the changes in effective fracture volume (V ef) by analyzing the changes in the RNP slope and total compressibility between these two flowback periods. V ef during FBs is in general 3%-45% lower than that during FBi. We also compare the drive mechanisms for the two flowback periods by calculating the compaction-drive index (CDI), hydrocarbon-drive index (HDI), and water-drive index (WDI). The dominant drive mechanism during both flowback periods is CDI, but its contribution is reduced by 16% in the FBs period. This drop is generally compensated by a relatively higher HDI during this period. The loss of effective fracture volume might be attributed to the pressure depletion in fractures, which occurs during the production period and can extend 800 days.

通过对比分析第一次和第二次返排数据,评价生产过程中裂缝体积损失。
在生产过程中,裂缝体积随着裂缝压力的减小而逐渐变化。然而,到目前为止,很少有可用的反排模型可以利用压力瞬态和速率瞬态数据来估计裂缝体积损失。第一次返排是在水力压裂后将压裂液排回,而第二次返排是在子井压裂前将注入母井的预压液排回。本研究的主要目的是比较第一次和第二次反排数据,以捕获生产和预压过程后裂缝体积的变化。这样的对比对于评价井的性能和优化压裂作业非常有用。利用在DJ盆地Niobrara和Codell地层完成的6口多裂缝水平井的初始和二次返排数据(分别为FBi和FBs),构建了速率归一化压力(RNP)与物质平衡时间(MBT)诊断图。总的来说,RNP图在FBs期间的斜率大于FBi期间的斜率,表明从FBi到FBs期间可能会损失裂缝体积。我们通过分析两段反排期间RNP斜率和总压缩性的变化来估计有效裂缝体积(V ef)的变化。FBs期间的V值一般比FBi期间低3%-45%。通过计算压实驱力指数(CDI)、油气驱力指数(HDI)和水驱力指数(WDI),对两个反排周期的驱力机制进行了比较。两个反排阶段的主要驱动机制都是CDI,但在FBs阶段,CDI的贡献减少了16%。在此期间,这种下降通常由相对较高的HDI来补偿。有效裂缝体积的损失可能是由于裂缝中的压力耗尽,这种情况发生在生产期间,并且可以持续800天。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
8.40%
发文量
678
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is a peer-reviewed open access journal that focuses on key topics of coal scientific research and mining development. It serves as a forum for scientists to present research findings and discuss challenging issues in the field. The journal covers a range of topics including coal geology, geochemistry, geophysics, mineralogy, and petrology. It also covers coal mining theory, technology, and engineering, as well as coal processing, utilization, and conversion. Additionally, the journal explores coal mining environment and reclamation, along with related aspects. The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is published with China Coal Society, who also cover the publication costs. This means that authors do not need to pay an article-processing charge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信