Validating a Novel 3D Printed Depth Gauge With Mandible Models.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Eric M Smith, Rhorie P Kerr, Ashley E Kita
{"title":"Validating a Novel 3D Printed Depth Gauge With Mandible Models.","authors":"Eric M Smith, Rhorie P Kerr, Ashley E Kita","doi":"10.1177/15533506251334694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background/needTraditional bone depth gauges are notoriously inaccurate tools, often used in head and neck surgery, that estimate the screw length needed for fracture fixation after bicortical drilling. Complications related to inaccurately sized screws may include soft tissue irritation or weakness of the repair and subsequent refracture. To improve size selection accuracy, a prototype depth gauge was 3D printed and tested in mandibles.MethodsThe prototype was constructed with a rotating deployable hook and intra-operative disassembly feature to extract the device if it became stuck. Ten 3.2 mm holes were drilled in a synthetic mandible, and 12 medical students, 12 residents, and 6 fellows/attendings measured them with industry standard and prototype depth gauges. User measurements from the prototype were compared to the holes' true depths and accuracy for each device was based on a user's closeness to the true depths. Differences between devices and training levels were analyzed with paired t tests and two-way ANOVAs. The device was also tested by 2 attendings in 2 cadavers with 8 holes drilled in each mandible.ResultsIn the synthetic model, differences between true depths and measured depths for the 2 gauges were not significantly different. Total accuracy was greater with the prototype, along with increased medical student accuracy compared to the industry standard. Prototype malfunctions were noted in the cadaveric model with no significant differences in device accuracy.ConclusionA novel 3D-printed depth gauge was tested and found to improve first time user accuracy and perform non-inferiorly to an industry standard depth gauge.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506251334694"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251334694","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/needTraditional bone depth gauges are notoriously inaccurate tools, often used in head and neck surgery, that estimate the screw length needed for fracture fixation after bicortical drilling. Complications related to inaccurately sized screws may include soft tissue irritation or weakness of the repair and subsequent refracture. To improve size selection accuracy, a prototype depth gauge was 3D printed and tested in mandibles.MethodsThe prototype was constructed with a rotating deployable hook and intra-operative disassembly feature to extract the device if it became stuck. Ten 3.2 mm holes were drilled in a synthetic mandible, and 12 medical students, 12 residents, and 6 fellows/attendings measured them with industry standard and prototype depth gauges. User measurements from the prototype were compared to the holes' true depths and accuracy for each device was based on a user's closeness to the true depths. Differences between devices and training levels were analyzed with paired t tests and two-way ANOVAs. The device was also tested by 2 attendings in 2 cadavers with 8 holes drilled in each mandible.ResultsIn the synthetic model, differences between true depths and measured depths for the 2 gauges were not significantly different. Total accuracy was greater with the prototype, along with increased medical student accuracy compared to the industry standard. Prototype malfunctions were noted in the cadaveric model with no significant differences in device accuracy.ConclusionA novel 3D-printed depth gauge was tested and found to improve first time user accuracy and perform non-inferiorly to an industry standard depth gauge.

用下颌骨模型验证一种新型3D打印深度计。
背景/需求传统的骨深度计是出了名的不准确的工具,通常用于头颈部手术,用于估计双皮质钻孔后骨折固定所需的螺钉长度。与螺钉尺寸不准确相关的并发症可能包括软组织刺激或修复无力以及随后的再骨折。为了提高尺寸选择的准确性,3D打印了一个原型深度计,并在下颌骨上进行了测试。方法采用旋转可展开钩和术中可拆卸功能,在器械卡死时取出器械。在人造下颌骨上钻10个3.2 mm的孔,12名医学生、12名住院医师和6名研究员/主治医师使用工业标准和原型深度计进行测量。将用户的测量值与孔的真实深度进行比较,每个设备的精度基于用户与真实深度的接近程度。使用配对t检验和双向方差分析分析设备和训练水平之间的差异。该装置还由两名主治医生在两具尸体上进行了测试,在每个下颌骨上钻了8个孔。结果在综合模型中,两种测深仪的真实深度与实测深度的差异无显著性差异。与行业标准相比,原型的总体准确性更高,同时医科学生的准确性也有所提高。在尸体模型中发现了原型故障,但设备精度没有显著差异。结论对一种新型3d打印深度计进行了测试,发现它可以提高首次用户的精度,并且性能不低于行业标准深度计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信