Small-field output factor dependence on the field size definition in MR-Linac.

Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-05-07 DOI:10.1002/mp.17857
Indra J Das, Ahtesham U Khan, Poonam Yadav
{"title":"Small-field output factor dependence on the field size definition in MR-Linac.","authors":"Indra J Das, Ahtesham U Khan, Poonam Yadav","doi":"10.1002/mp.17857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiation beam characteristics are primarily evaluated based on field size. However, in small fields, especially with magnetic fields used in new technology (MR-Linac), the field size definition is altered. Typically, field size is defined by two methods: geometric and dosimetric, which are evaluated in this study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Small field size definitions are distorted due to lateral electron disequilibrium and the presence of magnetic fields. MR-Linac systems, which combine an MR imaging system and a linear accelerator on a single gantry, require precise evaluations of field size definitions and beam parameters, particularly for small fields. which is investigated in this study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 0.35 T MRIdian Viewray system was evaluated using beam profiles and field output factors (FOF) with various MR-compatible microdetectors, such as ion chamber, microDiamond, microSilicon, and plastic scintillators. Validity of geometric field size (S) and dosimetric field size (S<sub>clin</sub>) is investigated with measurements performed with MR compatible scanning water phantom at 85 cm source-to-surface distance (SSD) at a depth of 5 cm. Measured FOF data was compared with treatment planning systems (TPS) and independent Monte Carlo simulations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The measured S<sub>clin</sub> data is detector and machine-dependent, while S is machine-dependent only. The FOF was found to be a smooth function of S within experimental uncertainties, showing higher reproducibility compared to S<sub>clin</sub> which exhibited erratic behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is concluded that geometric field size (S) provides accurate beam characterization data, whereas S<sub>clin</sub> may not be a reliable parameter in MR-Linac systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":94136,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radiation beam characteristics are primarily evaluated based on field size. However, in small fields, especially with magnetic fields used in new technology (MR-Linac), the field size definition is altered. Typically, field size is defined by two methods: geometric and dosimetric, which are evaluated in this study.

Purpose: Small field size definitions are distorted due to lateral electron disequilibrium and the presence of magnetic fields. MR-Linac systems, which combine an MR imaging system and a linear accelerator on a single gantry, require precise evaluations of field size definitions and beam parameters, particularly for small fields. which is investigated in this study.

Methods: A 0.35 T MRIdian Viewray system was evaluated using beam profiles and field output factors (FOF) with various MR-compatible microdetectors, such as ion chamber, microDiamond, microSilicon, and plastic scintillators. Validity of geometric field size (S) and dosimetric field size (Sclin) is investigated with measurements performed with MR compatible scanning water phantom at 85 cm source-to-surface distance (SSD) at a depth of 5 cm. Measured FOF data was compared with treatment planning systems (TPS) and independent Monte Carlo simulations.

Results: The measured Sclin data is detector and machine-dependent, while S is machine-dependent only. The FOF was found to be a smooth function of S within experimental uncertainties, showing higher reproducibility compared to Sclin which exhibited erratic behavior.

Conclusions: It is concluded that geometric field size (S) provides accurate beam characterization data, whereas Sclin may not be a reliable parameter in MR-Linac systems.

小场输出因子依赖于MR-Linac中场大小的定义。
背景:辐射束的特性主要是根据场的大小来评估的。然而,在小磁场中,特别是在新技术(MR-Linac)中使用的磁场中,磁场大小的定义被改变了。通常,场大小由两种方法确定:几何和剂量学,在本研究中进行了评估。目的:由于横向电子不平衡和磁场的存在,小场尺寸的定义是扭曲的。MR- linac系统将MR成像系统和直线加速器结合在一个单一的龙门架上,需要对场尺寸定义和光束参数进行精确评估,特别是对于小场。这是在这项研究中调查的。方法:采用离子室、微金刚石、微硅和塑料闪烁体等多种磁共振兼容微探测器,利用光束轮廓和场输出因子(FOF)对0.35 T mrridian view系统进行评价。几何场尺寸(S)和剂量场尺寸(Sclin)的有效性通过MR兼容扫描水模在5cm深度的85 cm源到表面距离(SSD)进行测量。测量的FOF数据与治疗计划系统(TPS)和独立的蒙特卡罗模拟进行了比较。结果:测定的Sclin数据与检测器和机器相关,而S仅与机器相关。FOF在实验不确定度范围内是S的平滑函数,与slin的不稳定行为相比,FOF具有更高的再现性。结论:几何场尺寸(S)提供了准确的光束表征数据,而Sclin可能不是MR-Linac系统的可靠参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信