Survey of Health Care Providers on Social Determinants of Health and Treatment Decision-Making for Patients With HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer.

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Oncology and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1007/s40487-025-00337-3
Monique Gary, Editha Krueger, Molly Kisiel, Kimberly Demirhan, Alexandra Guarin Barajas, Joanne C Ryan
{"title":"Survey of Health Care Providers on Social Determinants of Health and Treatment Decision-Making for Patients With HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer.","authors":"Monique Gary, Editha Krueger, Molly Kisiel, Kimberly Demirhan, Alexandra Guarin Barajas, Joanne C Ryan","doi":"10.1007/s40487-025-00337-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Social determinants of health (SDOH) are a range of nonmedical factors that contribute to outcome disparities among certain groups of patients; however, little is known about how SDOH affect treatment decision-making for patients with cancer, particularly those with metastatic breast cancer (mBC). This study sought to gain insights from physicians and advanced practice providers on the impact of SDOH on practice- and patient-level cancer care decision-making with a nationwide online survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Social Determinants of Health in Metastatic Breast Cancer Survey was developed by the Association of Cancer Care Centers (ACCC) in partnership with Pfizer Inc, and in consultation with SDOH specialists. The 23-question survey captured experiences with SDOH-informed treatment decision-making for patients with cancer via multiple choice, Likert-scale, and free-response questions. ACCC-member physicians and advanced practice providers in the USA completed the survey between 23 January and 8 February 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents (n = 145), a majority of whom were medical oncologists (60%), represented clinics from diverse geographic regions of the USA; approximately 65% of respondents' clinics served patient populations with ≥ 10% Black, Indigenous, or People of Color. Common comprehensive cancer care services were provided by at least 59% of clinics, and SDOH factors were assessed by approximately 75% of clinics at diagnosis. Navigation services were available for patients with mBC at approximately 75% of respondents' clinics. Financial considerations (51%) and the presence of a caregiver (35%) were the most frequently cited SDOH-related factors that impacted mBC treatment decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The surveyed ACCC-member care providers displayed a high degree of awareness regarding SDOH impacts on their practice and patients, but resource limitations were identified as barriers to comprehensive, SDOH-informed cancer care. Harnessing existing resources from local and national advocacy groups, especially navigator training programs, is an actionable, real-world solution for improving mBC care for patients facing SDOH barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":44205,"journal":{"name":"Oncology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"429-446"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40487-025-00337-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Social determinants of health (SDOH) are a range of nonmedical factors that contribute to outcome disparities among certain groups of patients; however, little is known about how SDOH affect treatment decision-making for patients with cancer, particularly those with metastatic breast cancer (mBC). This study sought to gain insights from physicians and advanced practice providers on the impact of SDOH on practice- and patient-level cancer care decision-making with a nationwide online survey.

Methods: The Social Determinants of Health in Metastatic Breast Cancer Survey was developed by the Association of Cancer Care Centers (ACCC) in partnership with Pfizer Inc, and in consultation with SDOH specialists. The 23-question survey captured experiences with SDOH-informed treatment decision-making for patients with cancer via multiple choice, Likert-scale, and free-response questions. ACCC-member physicians and advanced practice providers in the USA completed the survey between 23 January and 8 February 2024.

Results: Respondents (n = 145), a majority of whom were medical oncologists (60%), represented clinics from diverse geographic regions of the USA; approximately 65% of respondents' clinics served patient populations with ≥ 10% Black, Indigenous, or People of Color. Common comprehensive cancer care services were provided by at least 59% of clinics, and SDOH factors were assessed by approximately 75% of clinics at diagnosis. Navigation services were available for patients with mBC at approximately 75% of respondents' clinics. Financial considerations (51%) and the presence of a caregiver (35%) were the most frequently cited SDOH-related factors that impacted mBC treatment decision-making.

Conclusion: The surveyed ACCC-member care providers displayed a high degree of awareness regarding SDOH impacts on their practice and patients, but resource limitations were identified as barriers to comprehensive, SDOH-informed cancer care. Harnessing existing resources from local and national advocacy groups, especially navigator training programs, is an actionable, real-world solution for improving mBC care for patients facing SDOH barriers.

HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌患者健康和治疗决策的社会决定因素的卫生保健提供者调查
健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)是一系列非医学因素,导致某些患者群体的结果差异;然而,对于SDOH如何影响癌症患者的治疗决策,特别是那些转移性乳腺癌(mBC)患者,我们知之甚少。本研究旨在通过一项全国性的在线调查,从医生和高级实践提供者那里获得关于SDOH对实践和患者层面癌症护理决策的影响的见解。方法:转移性乳腺癌健康的社会决定因素调查由癌症护理中心协会(ACCC)与辉瑞公司合作开发,并咨询了SDOH专家。这项23个问题的调查通过多项选择、李克特量表和自由回答问题,收集了癌症患者在sdoh知情的治疗决策方面的经验。美国accc成员医师和高级执业医师在2024年1月23日至2月8日之间完成了调查。结果:受访者(n = 145),其中大多数是医学肿瘤学家(60%),代表了来自美国不同地理区域的诊所;大约65%的应答者诊所服务的患者人群中黑人、土著或有色人种的比例≥10%。至少59%的诊所提供常见的综合癌症护理服务,约75%的诊所在诊断时评估了SDOH因素。大约75%的应答者诊所为mBC患者提供导航服务。财务考虑(51%)和护理人员的存在(35%)是影响mBC治疗决策的最常见的sdoh相关因素。结论:接受调查的accc成员护理提供者对SDOH对他们的实践和患者的影响表现出高度的认识,但资源限制被认为是全面的、SDOH知情的癌症护理的障碍。利用地方和国家宣传团体的现有资源,特别是导航员培训项目,是改善面向SDOH障碍患者的mBC护理的可行的现实解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now indexed in PubMed Aims and Scope Oncology and Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality pre-clinical, clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Oncology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research. Rapid Publication The journal’s rapid publication timelines aim for a peer review decision within 2 weeks of submission. If an article is accepted it will be published online 3-4 weeks from acceptance. These rapid timelines are achieved through the combination of a dedicated in-house editorial team, who closely manage article workflow, and an extensive Editorial and Advisory Board who assist with rapid peer review. This allows the journal to support the rapid dissemination of research, whilst still providing robust peer review. Combined with the journal’s open access model this allows for the rapid and efficient communication of the latest research and reviews, allowing the advancement of clinical therapies. Personal Service The journal’s dedicated in-house editorial team offer a personal “concierge service” meaning that authors will always have a personal point of contact able to update them on the status of their manuscript. The editorial team check all manuscripts to ensure that articles conform to the most recent COPE, GPP and ICMJE publishing guidelines. This supports the publication of ethically sound and transparent research. We also encourage pre-submission enquiries and are always happy to provide a confidential assessment of manuscripts. Digital features and plain language summaries Oncology and Therapy offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by key summary points, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article. The journal also provides the option to include various types of digital features including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations. All additional features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. If you consider that your paper would benefit from the inclusion of a digital feature, please let us know. Our editorial team are able to create high-quality slide decks and infographics in-house, and video abstracts through our partner Research Square, and would be happy to assist in any way we can. For further information about digital features, please contact the journal editor (see ‘Contact the Journal’ for email address), and see the ‘Guidelines for digital features and plain language summaries’ document under ‘Submission guidelines’. Preprints We encourage posting of preprints of primary research manuscripts on preprint servers, authors'' or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration in our journals. Please see here for further information on preprint sharing: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/journal-author-helpdesk/submission/1302#c16721550 Peer Review Process Upon submission, manuscripts are assessed by the editorial team to ensure they fit within the aims and scope of the journal and are also checked for plagiarism. All suitable submissions are then subject to a comprehensive single-blind peer review. Reviewers are selected based on their relevant expertise and publication history in the subject area. The journal has an extensive pool of editorial and advisory board members who have been selected to assist with peer review based on the afore-mentioned criteria. At least two extensive reviews are required to make the editorial decision, with the exception of some article types such as Commentaries, Editorials and Letters which are generally reviewed by one member of the Editorial Board. Where reviewer recommendations are conflicted, the editorial board will be contacted for further advice and a presiding decision. Manuscripts are then either accepted, rejected or authors are required to make major or minor revisions (both reviewer comments and editorial comments may need to be addressed). Once a revised manuscript is re-submitted, it is assessed along with the responses to reviewer comments and if it has been adequately revised it will be accepted for publication. Accepted manuscripts are then copyedited and typeset by the production team before online publication. Appeals against decisions following peer review are considered on a case by case basis and should be sent to the journal editor. Copyright Oncology and Therapy''s content is published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, which allows users to read, copy, distribute, and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited. The author assigns the exclusive right to any commercial use of the article to Springer. For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, click here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 Publication Fees Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be required to pay the mandatory Rapid Service Fee of £3650/€4500/$5100. The journal will consider fee discounts for developing countries and this is decided on a case by case basis. Open Access All articles published by Oncology and Therapy are published open access Contact For more information about the journal, including pre-submission enquiries, please contact managing editor Lydia Alborn at lydia.alborn@springer.com.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信