Readmission and unplanned healthcare use after radical cystectomy are independent of discharge destination.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Maxwell Sandberg, Emily Ye, Gavin Underwood, Claudia Marie-Costa, Emily Roebuck, Sean Catley, Jorge Seoane, Nicholas Deebel, Wyatt Whitman, Dylan Wolff, Mark Xu, Mary Namugosa, Megan Escott, Rory Ritts, Stephen Tranchina, Connor Policastro, Ryan Terlecki
{"title":"Readmission and unplanned healthcare use after radical cystectomy are independent of discharge destination.","authors":"Maxwell Sandberg, Emily Ye, Gavin Underwood, Claudia Marie-Costa, Emily Roebuck, Sean Catley, Jorge Seoane, Nicholas Deebel, Wyatt Whitman, Dylan Wolff, Mark Xu, Mary Namugosa, Megan Escott, Rory Ritts, Stephen Tranchina, Connor Policastro, Ryan Terlecki","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Our primary purpose was studying utilization rates of home nursing assistance (HNA) and skilled nursing facility (SNF) placement after radical cystectomy (RC) and evaluating if their use was associated with emergency department (ED) visits, hospital readmissions, or mortality. Secondarily, we evaluated if patient socioeconomic status was associated with these factors following RC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent RC for bladder cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Discharge destination was labeled as home, HNA, or SNF. The incidence of ED visits was recorded at 30 and 90 days after discharge from surgical admission. Readmissions were tracked similarly. Area deprivation index (ADI) was collected on each patient and organized in quartiles (ADIQ), with worsening socioeconomic status as ADIQ increased.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 215 patients were discharged home, 148 to HNA and 25 to SNF. ED visits and readmissions after RC at the 30- and 90-day marks did not differ based on discharge destination (p>0.05). Home patients had a lower incidence of death after RC compared to HNA and SNF (p=0.037), but not overall survival (OS) time (p=0.572). Readmission to the hospital after 30 days of discharge was more likely as ADIQ increased (p=0.017). Discharge destination, ED visits, and readmission after 90 days of discharge from RC were not different based on patient ADIQ (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Discharge to home after RC is associated with lower mortality rates. Rates of readmission and use of ED resources appear independent of discharge destination. A greater ADIQ may interact with the likelihood of admission post-RC. Future efforts remain warranted to address disparities in postoperative management in the pursuit of health equity in urology.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":"E172-E178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12091046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8989","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Our primary purpose was studying utilization rates of home nursing assistance (HNA) and skilled nursing facility (SNF) placement after radical cystectomy (RC) and evaluating if their use was associated with emergency department (ED) visits, hospital readmissions, or mortality. Secondarily, we evaluated if patient socioeconomic status was associated with these factors following RC.

Methods: Patients who underwent RC for bladder cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Discharge destination was labeled as home, HNA, or SNF. The incidence of ED visits was recorded at 30 and 90 days after discharge from surgical admission. Readmissions were tracked similarly. Area deprivation index (ADI) was collected on each patient and organized in quartiles (ADIQ), with worsening socioeconomic status as ADIQ increased.

Results: A total of 215 patients were discharged home, 148 to HNA and 25 to SNF. ED visits and readmissions after RC at the 30- and 90-day marks did not differ based on discharge destination (p>0.05). Home patients had a lower incidence of death after RC compared to HNA and SNF (p=0.037), but not overall survival (OS) time (p=0.572). Readmission to the hospital after 30 days of discharge was more likely as ADIQ increased (p=0.017). Discharge destination, ED visits, and readmission after 90 days of discharge from RC were not different based on patient ADIQ (p>0.05).

Conclusions: Discharge to home after RC is associated with lower mortality rates. Rates of readmission and use of ED resources appear independent of discharge destination. A greater ADIQ may interact with the likelihood of admission post-RC. Future efforts remain warranted to address disparities in postoperative management in the pursuit of health equity in urology.

根治性膀胱切除术后的再入院和计划外医疗使用与出院目的地无关。
本研究的主要目的是研究根治性膀胱切除术(RC)后家庭护理辅助(HNA)和熟练护理设施(SNF)的使用率,并评估它们的使用是否与急诊科(ED)就诊、再入院或死亡率相关。其次,我们评估患者的社会经济地位是否与RC后的这些因素相关。方法:回顾性分析膀胱癌患者行膀胱切除术的临床资料。出院目的地被标记为家、海航或SNF。在手术出院后30天和90天记录急诊科就诊的发生率。再入院人数也进行了类似的追踪。收集每位患者的区域剥夺指数(ADI)并按四分位数(ADIQ)组织,随着ADIQ的增加,社会经济状况恶化。结果:215例患者出院回家,148例到海航,25例到SNF。在出院目的地不同的情况下,30天和90天的急诊科就诊和再入院率没有差异(p>0.05)。与HNA和SNF相比,居家患者RC后的死亡率较低(p=0.037),但总生存时间较低(p=0.572)。出院后30天再入院的可能性随着ADIQ的增加而增加(p=0.017)。出院目的地、急诊科就诊和出院90天后再入院的患者ADIQ差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:术后出院与较低的死亡率相关。再入院率和急诊室资源的使用似乎与出院目的地无关。较高的ADIQ可能与rc后入院的可能性相互作用。在追求泌尿外科健康公平的过程中,未来的努力仍有必要解决术后管理方面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信