Patient safety attitude among intensive care unit physicians and nurses: a multi-center study in Egypt.

Q1 Nursing
Taghareed A Elhoseny, Mohamed A Kandil, Rasha A Mosallam
{"title":"Patient safety attitude among intensive care unit physicians and nurses: a multi-center study in Egypt.","authors":"Taghareed A Elhoseny, Mohamed A Kandil, Rasha A Mosallam","doi":"10.1186/s42506-025-00190-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous safety culture assessment, especially in high-risk areas as the intensive care unit (ICU) is one of the requirements for patient safety. This study aimed to assess patient safety attitude in the intensive care units of four public hospitals in Egypt, compare it with benchmarking data, and identify opportunities for improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional design was used. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) was distributed in March 2024 to a total of 543 physicians and nurses involved in direct patient care in eight ICU of four public hospitals. A response rate of 85% was achieved (65.12% for physicians and 89.28% for nurses). Safety culture score (ranges from 0 to 100) and percent-positive scores (percentage of respondents with a mean score of > 75 where 100 is best) were calculated according to the tool scoring key. The scores were also compared with the benchmarking scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall mean scale score was 63.7 ± 13.4 and the percentage of positive responses was 58.1%. Job satisfaction was the dimension with the highest total mean and percentage of positive responses (70.0 and 65.1%, respectively). On the other hand, stress recognition was the dimension with the lowest mean score and percentage of positive responses (59.4 ± 23.8 and 53.6%, respectively). Physicians attained a significantly higher total mean scale score for the teamwork climate, job satisfaction, perceptions of management and work conditions dimensions compared to nurses (73.8 ± 10.4, 81.7 ± 14.6, 72.5 ± 19.4, 70.6 ± 18.1 for physicians compared to 61.0 ± 15.4, 68.4 ± 23.0, 60.8 ± 22.4, 61.8 ± 22.3 for nurses, respectively) (p < 0.05) while \"stress recognition'' was significantly higher among nurses (mean scale score for nurses was 60.4 ± 23.6, p < 0.05 compared to 52.0 ± 24.0, p < 0.05 for physicians). The dimensions \"teamwork climate'', \"safety climate'' and \"stress recognition'' attained lower scores in the current study compared to the benchmark data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dimensions \"teamwork climate'', \"safety climate'', and \"stress recognition'' attained relatively low scores which calls for interventions such as team trainings, limitation of work hours and senior executive safety rounds. Physicians had significantly higher scores than nurses in four out of six domains which needs further research to identify the reasons and plan the appropriate improvement strategies. Future studies should track changes over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":22819,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association","volume":"100 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42506-025-00190-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Continuous safety culture assessment, especially in high-risk areas as the intensive care unit (ICU) is one of the requirements for patient safety. This study aimed to assess patient safety attitude in the intensive care units of four public hospitals in Egypt, compare it with benchmarking data, and identify opportunities for improvement.

Methods: A cross-sectional design was used. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) was distributed in March 2024 to a total of 543 physicians and nurses involved in direct patient care in eight ICU of four public hospitals. A response rate of 85% was achieved (65.12% for physicians and 89.28% for nurses). Safety culture score (ranges from 0 to 100) and percent-positive scores (percentage of respondents with a mean score of > 75 where 100 is best) were calculated according to the tool scoring key. The scores were also compared with the benchmarking scores.

Results: The overall mean scale score was 63.7 ± 13.4 and the percentage of positive responses was 58.1%. Job satisfaction was the dimension with the highest total mean and percentage of positive responses (70.0 and 65.1%, respectively). On the other hand, stress recognition was the dimension with the lowest mean score and percentage of positive responses (59.4 ± 23.8 and 53.6%, respectively). Physicians attained a significantly higher total mean scale score for the teamwork climate, job satisfaction, perceptions of management and work conditions dimensions compared to nurses (73.8 ± 10.4, 81.7 ± 14.6, 72.5 ± 19.4, 70.6 ± 18.1 for physicians compared to 61.0 ± 15.4, 68.4 ± 23.0, 60.8 ± 22.4, 61.8 ± 22.3 for nurses, respectively) (p < 0.05) while "stress recognition'' was significantly higher among nurses (mean scale score for nurses was 60.4 ± 23.6, p < 0.05 compared to 52.0 ± 24.0, p < 0.05 for physicians). The dimensions "teamwork climate'', "safety climate'' and "stress recognition'' attained lower scores in the current study compared to the benchmark data.

Conclusion: The dimensions "teamwork climate'', "safety climate'', and "stress recognition'' attained relatively low scores which calls for interventions such as team trainings, limitation of work hours and senior executive safety rounds. Physicians had significantly higher scores than nurses in four out of six domains which needs further research to identify the reasons and plan the appropriate improvement strategies. Future studies should track changes over time.

重症监护病房医生和护士的患者安全态度:埃及的一项多中心研究。
背景:持续的安全文化评估,特别是在高危地区的重症监护病房(ICU)是患者安全的要求之一。本研究旨在评估埃及四家公立医院重症监护病房的患者安全态度,将其与基准数据进行比较,并确定改进的机会。方法:采用横断面设计。安全态度问卷(SAQ)于2024年3月发放给4家公立医院8家ICU共543名直接护理患者的医生和护士。有效率为85%(医生65.12%,护士89.28%)。根据工具评分键计算安全文化得分(范围从0到100)和百分比阳性得分(平均得分为bbb75的受访者百分比,其中100是最好的)。这些分数也与基准分数进行了比较。结果:量表总平均得分为63.7±13.4分,阳性应答率为58.1%。工作满意度是总平均值和积极回应百分比最高的维度(分别为70.0和65.1%)。应激识别是平均得分最低的维度,阳性反应率分别为59.4±23.8和53.6%。医师在团队合作氛围、工作满意度、管理感知和工作条件维度的总平均得分显著高于护士(73.8±10.4、81.7±14.6、72.5±19.4、70.6±18.1,分别高于护士(61.0±15.4、68.4±23.0、60.8±22.4、61.8±22.3)(p)。“团队氛围”、“安全氛围”和“压力认知”维度得分相对较低,需要进行团队培训、限制工作时间和高管安全轮询等干预措施。医生在6个领域中有4个领域的得分明显高于护士,这需要进一步研究以确定原因并制定适当的改进策略。未来的研究应该追踪随着时间的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal accepts papers of original research which are not being considered for publication elsewhere and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge of Public Health at large
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信