Knowledge and comfort predict teaching about sexism in school teachers.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Social Psychology of Education Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-29 DOI:10.1007/s11218-025-10049-1
Aífe Hopkins-Doyle, Lindsey Cameron, Lauren Spinner, Bridget Dibb, Andrea Kočiš, Rose Brett, Harriet R Tenenbaum
{"title":"Knowledge and comfort predict teaching about sexism in school teachers.","authors":"Aífe Hopkins-Doyle, Lindsey Cameron, Lauren Spinner, Bridget Dibb, Andrea Kočiš, Rose Brett, Harriet R Tenenbaum","doi":"10.1007/s11218-025-10049-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although lessons about sexism can increase gender egalitarianism in children, teachers often shy away from discussing sensitive topics, such as sexism, in classrooms. We conducted two studies to examine why teachers may not discuss sexism. In a qualitative study with 20 primary school teachers, teachers reported not discussing sexism because of the belief that sexism was not an issue, low comfort, and low knowledge levels in teaching sexism, that sexism was less important than other topics, and not enough support from parents and schools. Teachers taught about sexism to balance out other perspectives, when they had support from authorities, and when sexism was related to a lesson. Using the themes found in Study 1, Study 2 developed quantitative measures to examine the predictors of intentions to teach about sexism among 233 primary and secondary school teachers. The full model found that teachers had higher intentions to teach about sexism when they felt more comfortable and knowledgeable about teaching sexism and when teachers were younger. We discuss findings from both studies in terms of theoretical and practical implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":"28 1","pages":"102"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12041106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychology of Education","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10049-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although lessons about sexism can increase gender egalitarianism in children, teachers often shy away from discussing sensitive topics, such as sexism, in classrooms. We conducted two studies to examine why teachers may not discuss sexism. In a qualitative study with 20 primary school teachers, teachers reported not discussing sexism because of the belief that sexism was not an issue, low comfort, and low knowledge levels in teaching sexism, that sexism was less important than other topics, and not enough support from parents and schools. Teachers taught about sexism to balance out other perspectives, when they had support from authorities, and when sexism was related to a lesson. Using the themes found in Study 1, Study 2 developed quantitative measures to examine the predictors of intentions to teach about sexism among 233 primary and secondary school teachers. The full model found that teachers had higher intentions to teach about sexism when they felt more comfortable and knowledgeable about teaching sexism and when teachers were younger. We discuss findings from both studies in terms of theoretical and practical implications.

知识和舒适度预测了学校教师的性别歧视教学。
虽然关于性别歧视的课程可以增强孩子们的性别平等意识,但老师们往往羞于在课堂上讨论敏感话题,比如性别歧视。我们进行了两项研究,以调查为什么教师可能不讨论性别歧视。在一项针对20名小学教师的定性研究中,教师表示不讨论性别歧视的原因是他们认为性别歧视不是一个问题,对性别歧视的满意度不高,对性别歧视的教学知识水平不高,认为性别歧视的重要性低于其他话题,并且没有得到家长和学校的足够支持。教师讲授性别歧视是为了平衡其他观点,当他们得到权威机构的支持时,当性别歧视与一节课有关时。利用研究1中的主题,研究2开发了定量测量方法,以检验233名中小学教师关于性别歧视的教学意图的预测因素。完整的模型发现,当教师对教授性别歧视感到更舒服、更了解时,以及教师更年轻时,他们教授性别歧视的意愿更高。我们将从理论和实践意义上讨论这两项研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Psychology of Education
Social Psychology of Education PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The field of social psychology spans the boundary between the disciplines of psychology and sociology and has traditionally been associated with empirical research. Many studies of human behaviour in education are conducted by persons who identify with social psychology or whose work falls into the social psychological ambit. Several textbooks have been published and a variety of courses are being offered on the `social psychology of education'', but no journal has hitherto appeared to cover the field. Social Psychology of Education fills this gap, covering a wide variety of content concerns, theoretical interests and research methods, among which are: Content concerns: classroom instruction decision making in education educational innovation concerns for gender, race, ethnicity and social class knowledge creation, transmission and effects leadership in schools and school systems long-term effects of instructional processes micropolitics of schools student cultures and interactions teacher recruitment and careers teacher- student relations Theoretical interests: achievement motivation attitude theory attribution theory conflict management and the learning of pro-social behaviour cultural and social capital discourse analysis group dynamics role theory social exchange theory social transition social learning theory status attainment symbolic interaction the study of organisations Research methods: comparative research experiments formal observations historical studies literature reviews panel studies qualitative methods sample surveys For social psychologists with a special interest in educational matters, educational researchers with a social psychological approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信